Love thy neighbor, and everyone else too

Suppose, as before , a 1d lattice of N N particles, each with a spin σ i { 1 , + 1 } \sigma_i\in\{-1,+1\} .

In that problem, particles could interact with their nearest neighbors, but no further. As a result, no long-range order is possible above a temperature of absolute zero.

Here, consider the case where particles can interact with particles infinitely far down the lattice with the energy

E ( σ i , σ j ) = σ i σ j i j γ r E(\sigma_i, \sigma_j) = -\frac{\sigma_i\cdot\sigma_j}{\left| i-j\right| ^{\gamma_r}}

What is the largest value of the exponent γ r \gamma_r for which the lattice will prefer an ordered state at some non-zero temperature, T c T_c , in the limit N N\rightarrow \infty ?


The answer is 2.0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Josh Silverman Staff
May 17, 2014

Once again, the ground state is given by the arrangement

\ldots \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \ldots

which has the energy

N + N d i N + N d j i j γ r 2 N i = 1 N i 1 \int\limits_{-N}^{+N}di\int\limits_{-N}^{+N} \frac{dj}{\lvert i - j \rvert^{\gamma_r}} \approx 2N\sum\limits_{i=1}^N i^{-1}

and the entropy

S = k B log 2 S = k_B \log 2

The lowest excitation from the ground state is the formation of a single domain wall, which is a hard boundary between up and down spins:

\ldots \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \downarrow \downarrow \downarrow \downarrow \ldots

This state has entropy S = k B log N S = k_B \log N because the domain wall can be placed at any of the N N positions in the 1d line.

The energy of this state, relative to the ground state, is found by summing the spin interactions between each pair of unlike spin states. For convenience, we place the boundary at between i = n i=n and i = n + 1 i=n+1 .

First, we integrate over each interaction of a given up spin, then we integrate over all up spins. In a bit more detail, the steps are

  • Integrate over all interactions of "up" spin n n to get an expression for the energy due to a given spin variable n n
  • Take the limit N N\rightarrow\infty , to get kill off terms that die in the infinite limit.
  • Integrate over all of the "up" spins to get an expression for the energy of all up-down interactions as a function of the number of particles in the system N N
  • Consider the behavior of E ( domain wall ) E(\text{domain wall}) in the infinite limit for different value of s i g m a sigma

The integral we face is given by

E ( domain wall ) = lim N 1 n d i n + 1 N d j Δ E i j γ r E(\text{domain wall})=\lim\limits_{N\rightarrow\infty}\int\limits_1^n di \int\limits_{n+1}^N dj \frac{\Delta E}{\lvert i-j \rvert^{\gamma_r}}

To ease calculation, let's make the change of variables

l = i j d l = d j \begin{aligned} l&=i-j \\ dl&=-dj \end{aligned}

so that l l goes from n 1 n-1 to N i N-i , and i i goes from 1 1 to N N .

Proceeding with the integral over l l

E ( domain wall ) = Δ E 1 n d i n i N i d l l γ r = Δ E γ r 1 1 n d i [ 1 ( N i ) γ r 1 1 ( n i ) γ r 1 ] \begin{aligned} E(\textrm{domain wall}) &= \Delta E \int\limits_1^n di \int\limits_{n-i}^{N-i} \frac{dl}{l^{\gamma_r}} \\ &= \frac{- \Delta E}{\gamma_r-1}\int\limits_1^n di \left[\frac{1}{\left(N-i\right)^{{\gamma_r}-1}} - \frac{1}{\left(n-i\right)^{\gamma_r-1}}\right] \\ \end{aligned}

which becomes

E ( domain wall ) Δ E γ r 1 1 n d i 1 ( n i ) γ r 1 E(\text{domain wall}) \approx \frac{\Delta E}{{\gamma_r}-1}\int\limits_1^n di\frac{1}{\left(n-i\right)^{{\gamma_r}-1}}

in the limit N N\rightarrow\infty . Performing the integral over i i , we have

E ( domain wall ) Δ E ( n + 1 ) 2 γ r ( γ r 1 ) ( γ r 2 ) E(\textrm{domain wall}) \approx \Delta E \frac{ (n+1)^{2-\gamma_r}}{\left(\gamma_r-1\right)\left(\gamma_r-2\right)}

which goes as N 2 γ r \sim N^{2-{\gamma_r}} .

Recall, the entropy of the domain wall is given by k B log N \sim k_B\log N since we can place the wall at any of the N N spin variables. N 2 γ r N^{2-{\gamma_r}} clearly outpaces log N \log N for all σ < 2 \sigma < 2 and so, entropy will always win for low enough temperatures.

In other words, there will always be a finite T T below which N 2 γ r > k B T log N N^{2-{\gamma_r}} > k_B T\log N , i.e. in which the ground state is favored over the domain wall, in the infinite limit. This implies that for γ r < 2 \gamma_r<2 , the infinite 1d spin lattice will find long range order at finite temperatures and, so, the upper bound for γ r \gamma_r is 2.

This is actually a very hard problem. I guessed the inverse-square law because odd powers won't make any sense, and the inverse square law is everywhere in physics.

By the way, do you make these problems yourself? Most of my physics problems were either not original or derived from some known result. I find it hard to think of something novel in physics because the physics should be experimentally verified.

Steven Zheng - 6 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I was reading a chapter about phase transitions and it was pointed out that "the idea that 1d systems can't have phase transitions" is wrong, because long-range interactions in 1d systems can lead to ordering. I got this result from thinking about that. Freeman Dyson solved the problem in 1968 in the following paper Existence of a phase-transition in a one-dimensional Ising ferromagnet in a much more rigorous way than I do here.

Most of my problems I make up, some I repurpose from the classics.

Josh Silverman Staff - 6 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...