Lyttelton-Bondi Model for the Expansion of the Universe


In 1959 Lyttelton and Bondi suggested that the expansion of the Universe could be explained on the basis of Newtonian mechanics if matter carried a net electric charge.Imagine a spherical volume of astronomical size and radius R R and containing un-ionized atomic hydrogen gas of uniform density n n = 1 0 26 k g . m 3 10^{-26} kg.m^{-3} and assume that the proton charge e = ( 1 + y ) e e'=-(1+y)*e where e e is the electron charge.


A A : Obtain the least value of y y for which the electrostatic repulsion is larger than the gravitational attraction and the gas expands.Let y y = 1 0 z 10^z (approximately).


B B : Obtain an expression for the force of repulsion on an atom which is at a distance R R from the centre of the spherical volume.Then say the radial velocity is proportional to R p R^p .Let us label the proportionality constant as H H .Assume that the density is maintained constant by the creation of matter in space.Assume also that the value of y y is larger than the equilibrium value calculated in part A A above and hence ignore gravity.


C C : Calculate the numerical value of H H .Take the value of y y to be one order of magnitude larger than the equilibrium value calculated in part A A above.Say the value is equal to b 1 0 c b*10^c /sec (where 0 < b < 2 0<b<2 and evaluate b b upto 1 place of decimal).


D D : Given that at time t = 0 t=0 ,the volume of the Universe was V V ,then at time t t the volume will be V e a H t V*e^{a*H*t} .


Evaluate a + z + p + b + c a+z+p+b+c .


Finally you can think of why Lyttelton-Bondi model has been largely discarded by the scientific community.



The answer is -29.2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Rajdeep Brahma
Jun 15, 2018

A A :Equate Energies or Pressure or Force.Note that total charge Q Q = N q = N ( e y ) Nq=N(-e*y) ,u will easily get the value of y = 0.9 1 0 18 = ( a p p r o x ) 1 0 18 y=0.9*10^{-18}=(approx)10^{-18} .So z = 18 z=-18 .

B B :The force on the atom at a distance r is F say, and from coulombs law F= k Q R 2 \frac{k*Q}{R^2} .F=m d v d t \frac{dv}{dt} =mv d v d r \frac{dv}{dr} and Q = Q= n m \frac{n}{m'} 4 3 \frac{4}{3} π \pi r 3 r^3 q q where m' is mass of proton and q = e y q=-e*y so v is proportional to r.Hence p=1.

C C :Now H can be easily determined from the previous equation and is equal to e y m \frac{e*y}{m'} * ( 3 2 ( ϵ ) ) 0.5 (\frac{3}{2*(\epsilon)})^{0.5} .Plug in values where y = 1 0 17 y=10^{-17} and you will get H = 1.8 1 0 17 H=1.8*10^{-17} ..so b=1.8 and c=(-17)

D D : d V d t \frac{dV}{dt} =3 V H or d V V \frac{dV}{V} =3Hdt,so a=3,Hence answer = z + p + b + c + a z+p+b+c+a =-29.2

Finally constant H obtained is physically similar to Hubble's constant.Observed value of Hubble's constant is 2.3X 1 0 18 10^{-18} /s where as obtained H= 1.8X 1 0 17 10^{-17} /s.Further,experiments do not indicate a difference in the magnitudes of the electron and proton charge.Some theories regarding the nature of the fundamental forces and elementary particles also do not point to a difference.

This is the 2006 INPHO 8th Subjective Question.No claim of originality is made.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...