One of the most lethal NERF guns is the Strongarm, a 6 shooter revolver known for its rapid fire. The firing mechanism is straightforward, a spring is used to drive air through a cylinder which then forces the dart out of the barrel.
Its popularity is due in part to the ease with which it can be modified to shoot faster and farther. One easy modification is to insert a secondary spring inside the main spring, as shown below:
If the strength (spring constant) of the first spring is k , and the strength of the second spring is 2 1 k , what is the strength of the two springs together?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Harianto Wibowo How do you arrive at the formula k = k 1 + k 2 ?
Log in to reply
If two springs are connected in parallel and the arrangement is pulled by a net force F,then both the springs have the same displacement (say x). If the spring constants of the 2 springs are k1 and k2 respectively then F=k1x +k2x Also if the effective spring constant is k, F=kx Equating kx = k1x + k2x Hence k= k1+ k2
If two springs are connected at a time to an object or an obeject placed in between two springs, then F = k¹x + k²x = Kx => K = k¹+ k² and If two springs are connected to one another and then to object, then
X (total displacement on stretching the combined springs) = x¹ + x² (F/K) = (F/k¹)+(F/k²) as the force on the two springs are same Hence, (1/K) = (1/K¹) + (1/K²)
Why is it easy to load using 2 springs? Why not use one spring of 3/2k instead?
The reason why we can add the springs strength together, can be easily explained when we consider what the strength means. The force the spring employs when compressed or stretched a certain distance from its equilibrium is
f = k ⋅ x
Therefore, the force employed by the two springs together is
f = k ⋅ x + 2 k ⋅ x
Which then is equivalent to
f = 2 3 k ⋅ x
And now we see that we can consider the two springs, when employed in parallel, as one spring with the strength the sum of their strengths.
The forces due to both the springs would add up for any displacement. k1+k2=K
This problem is really easy to overthink, but it is actually quite simple.
k
= 1
k
1/2
k
= .5
k
Now if we add these two “conversions” together you get 1.5
k
!
But one more switch-a-roo is necessary to complete the job.
1.5
k
= 3/2
k
Therefore the answer is:
3/2
k
!
Why not just add 1 + 1/2 to get 1 1/2 = 3/2?
The words " the ease with which it can be modified to shoot faster and farther. " give the solution without any calculus. The only solution that increase significantly the strength of the shoot is the first one ;-) Do you really think that people will notice a 1.22 difference ? :-P
So in order to get the total strength of the springs, we add the individual strengths together. See below :
k + 1/2 k
= k/1+ k/2 (LCM is 2)
= (2k+k)/2
= 3k/2 or 3/2 k
k = 1 k , so 2 1 k + 1 k = 1 2 1 k which would be * 2 3 k *
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As you can see, the two springs are connected parallel.
If two springs are connected parallel, then the formula for their stiffnesses is:
k = k 1 + k 2
k = k + 2 1 k
k = 2 3 k