Evaluate 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 m o d 2 0 1 6 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The given expression may be very intimidating when it comes to terms not relatively prime, but if you observe their prime factorizations carefully, this problem becomes the nice breeze. :)
Let a denote the given value to be evaluated. Notice that 2 0 1 6 = 2 5 × 3 2 × 7 and 1 2 = 2 2 × 3 . Since g cd ( a , 2 0 1 6 ) = 1 , the first step is to evaluate m o d 2 5 , m o d 3 2 and m o d 7 separately. Then, apply Chinese Remainder Theorem to determine the answer.
Since a contains 2 5 = 3 2 and 3 2 = 9 as its divisors, a ≡ 0 m o d ( 2 5 ⋅ 3 2 )
Note: You can also split into two factors for ( 2 5 ⋅ 3 2 ) . However, that wouldn't be necessary since it suffices that a ≡ 0 for both of these factors.
Since g cd ( a , 7 ) = 1 , we can use Euler's Theorem to evaluate a m o d 7 , which shows that if b 6 ≡ 1 m o d 7 where ( b , 7 ) = 1 , for exponents 2 5 2 0 1 6 ≡ ( 6 ⋅ 4 + 1 ) 2 0 1 6 ≡ 1 m o d 6 so a ≡ 1 2 ≡ 5 m o d 7
Since we already know that for m o d 2 5 and m o d 3 2 , a ≡ 0 , apply Chinese Remainder Theorem to obtain a ≡ 0 m o d ( 2 5 ⋅ 3 2 ) . Evaluating the following a a ≡ 0 m o d ( 2 5 ⋅ 3 2 ) ≡ 5 m o d 7 gives a = 1 4 4 0 . You can simply verify this by Euclidean algorithm to see that a works for both congruences.
This is a very standard approach. Hope you don't mind my feedback, but I would like to mention that there's a few leeways/shortcuts to simplify your work. (see below)
There isn't a need to break up 2016 into 3 pairwise coprime integers ( 2 5 × 3 2 × 7 ) . Yes, you're essentially applying Chinese Remainder Theorem , but you just need to break it up into 2 coprime positive integers, namely = 2 5 × 3 2 2 8 8 × 7 .
It's easy to show that for integer N ≥ 3 , 288 divides 1 2 N , hence 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 is divisible by 288. And by Fermat's little theorem ,
1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 m o d 7 = 1 2 ( 2 5 2 0 1 6 m o d 6 ) m o d 7 = 1 2 1 2 0 1 6 m o d 7 = 5 .
Hence, we're down to solving the 2 (not 3) linear congruences:
{ X ≡ 0 ( m o d 2 8 8 ) X ≡ 5 ( m o d 7 ) .
A trial and error (by listing the first few multiples of 288) and comparing with modulo 7 shows that X ≡ 1 4 4 0 ( m o d 2 0 1 6 ) .
Log in to reply
Yes. Could have done that. Chose to edit my solution a little bit. :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since 2 0 1 6 = 2 5 3 2 7 , and g cd ( 1 2 , 2 ) = 1 and g cd ( 1 2 , 3 ) = 1 , let us consider the three prime factors separately.
1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 ≡ ( 2 2 3 ) 2 5 2 0 1 6 ≡ 0 (mod 2 5 ) ≡ ( 2 2 3 ) 2 5 2 0 1 6 ≡ 0 (mod 3 2 ) ≡ 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 mod ϕ ( 7 ) (mod 7) ≡ 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 mod 6 (mod 7) ≡ 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 mod ϕ ( 6 ) mod 6 (mod 7) ≡ 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 mod 2 mod 6 (mod 7) ≡ 1 2 2 5 0 mod 6 (mod 7) ≡ 1 2 1 ≡ 5 (mod 7) Since g cd ( 1 2 , 7 ) = 1 , Euler’s theorem applies. Euler’s totient function ϕ ( 7 ) = 6 Since g cd ( 2 5 , 6 ) = 1 , Euler’s theorem applies. Euler’s totient function ϕ ( 6 ) = 2
Since 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 ≡ { 0 (mod 2 5 ) 0 (mod 3 2 ) ⟹ 2 5 3 2 n ≡ 2 8 8 n (mod 2016) , where n is an integer.
Now, we have:
1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 2 8 8 n n ⟹ n ⟹ 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 6 ≡ 5 (mod 7) ≡ 5 (mod 7) ≡ 5 (mod 7) = 5 ≡ 2 8 8 n (mod 2016) ≡ 1 4 4 0 (mod 2016) Note that 2 8 8 ≡ 1 (mod 7)