9 x 2 + 1 2 x + 4 = x 3 + 3 x 2 ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) + 3 x ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 + ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3
Find an integer solution of x to the equation above.
Notation: ∣ ⋅ ∣ denotes the absolute value function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Log in to reply
@Zakir Husain - Maybe after some sleep, k, bye! (Check the US time right now! also I slept at midnight coz of Mathathon!)
Uniqueness | 5 | a bit unique, not entirely unique though |
Latex | 10 | Nice coloring! |
No Mistakes | 10 | The solution has no mistakes |
Clarity | 10 | The solution is clear |
Time | 7 | 4th solution |
@Zakir Husain 's Total | 42 | Great! |
Log in to reply
@Abhinandan Shrimal ???, this was my solution, right @Percy Jackson ?
thanks to edit!
There were too many solutions for my puny brain to comprehend, so it got mixed up, sorry 'bout that, its edited now!
The given equation can be as:
9 x 2 + 1 2 x + 4 9 ( x 2 − 2 x + 1 ) + 3 0 x − 5 9 ( x − 1 ) 2 + 3 0 ( x − 1 ) + 2 5 2 5 = ( x + 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 = ( ( x − 1 ) + 3 2 5 ) 3 = ( x − 1 ) 3 + 3 3 2 5 ( x − 1 ) 2 + 3 ( 3 2 5 ) 2 ( x − 1 ) + 2 5 = 2 5 Putting x = 1
Therefore, x = 1 is a root and ∣ x ∣ = 1 .
@Chew-Seong Cheong - Sir, do you know if someone else can change my question, like a moderator or staff, because they just made it better by giving the link to the absolute value function, as I hadn't written that.
Log in to reply
Hi Percy, there are a few moderators and staffs that proofread the problems written by the community. Chew-Seong Cheong is one of the moderators. He is in fact, the best and the most active one.
Log in to reply
Oh! Thanks @Brilliant Mathematics , and @Chew-Seong Cheong sir!
The given equation can be divided into two functions.
f ( x ) = 9 x 2 + 1 2 x + 4 g ( x ) = x 3 + 3 x 2 ⋅ ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) + 3 x ⋅ ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 + ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 z = 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3
Notice: 4 < 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3
f ′ ( x ) = 1 8 x + 1 2 g ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 + 6 x z + 3 z 2
As z>4 and one of our functions has an uneven degree, the other one an even, we can deduce that our graphs will have intersected at least twice until the x-value that is the solution of f’(x)<g’(x).
f ′ ( x ) ≤ g ′ ( x )
1 8 x + 1 2 ≤ 3 x 2 + 1 1 , 4 + 1 0 . 8 3 2 2 , 8 3 ≤ − 1 8 x + 3 x 2 − 1 1 . 4 x 0 ≤ 3 x 2 − 1 1 , 4 x − 2 2 . 8 3 x 1 ≈ 1 . 4 4 ; x 2 ≈ − 5 . 2 4
Of course the solution may be outside the interval [-infinity; 1.44], but it may be worth taking a shot as we have a chance of 0.33 that we find our solution in that interval.
Luckily we can make that interval even smaller as x^3 is known to have a lot of negative y-values and f(x) can not have negative values for y.
To be exact, we search for a value of x where g(x) is switching signs.
0 = x 3 + 3 x 2 ⋅ ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) + 3 x ⋅ ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 + ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 x ≈ − 1 . 9 2 4
Now that we know that atleast one solution must be inside the interval [-1.924; -1.44]. Knowing that, we can make a chart with all values of g(x) inside the interval. We will only compute integer values of x as the problem solution is stated to be an integer.
x | g(x) |
-1 | 0.7889 |
0 | 7.122 |
1 | 25 |
25 is the only integer solution g(x). As f(x) must always have integer solutions we can now check if the point A(1,25) is a point of f(x).
f ( x ) = 9 x 2 + 1 2 x + 4 f ( 1 ) = 9 ⋅ 1 + 1 2 ⋅ 1 + 4 f ( 1 ) = 2 5
Answer: x=1 is the integer solution to the equation.
Uniqueness | 5 | Good job deriving functions and stuff |
Latex | 10 | Good Latex |
No Mistakes | 10 | The solution has no mistakes |
Clarity | 10 | The solution is clear |
Time | 6 | 5th solution |
@Lorenz W. 's Total | 41 | Great! |
L o g i c w a y :
If you try a decimal in the answer box, then you'll see it only accepts integers.
0 + 0 + 4 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 2 4
4 and 24 are apart by 20 units
we get 25 and 61
they are apart by 36 units.
This distance is more than before, which means we are going the wrong way.
we get − 1 = − 1
∣ − 1 ∣ = 1
YAY!
Putting x = − 1 does not gives solution
Log in to reply
Oh, Thanks @Zakir Husain ! I'll correct it
Uniqueness | 0 | Common approach |
Latex | 10 | Latex = good |
No Mistakes | 5 | Last two paragraph thingy-s are wrong |
Clarity | 10 | everything is clear |
Time | 8 | Third solution |
@Abhinandan Shrimal 's Total | 33 | Nice! |
After some rearrangement, the equation reduces to the form :
x 3 + 3 ( 3 2 5 − 4 ) x 2 + 3 ( ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 − 4 ) x + ( ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 − 4 ) = 0 .
This is an equation of degree 3 , and hence has 3 roots . So something specific must be mentioned about the nature of the root wanted as the answer.
It seems from the answer box that an integer root is wanted.
That root of the equation is 1 .
Uniqueness | 10 | Rearranging to find its roots is unique |
Latex | 10 | Bold text and box |
No Mistakes | 10 | The solution has no mistakes |
Clarity | 5 | The solution isn't very clear, like how the rearrangement was done, or how 1 is the only integer root |
Time | 9 | 2nd solution |
@Alak Bhattacharya 's Total | 44 | Cool! |
So first we factor the RHS. Study the
coefficients closely
. This is the
3
r
d
row of the
Pascal’s triangle
. So
9
x
2
+
1
2
x
+
4
=
(
x
+
(
3
2
5
−
1
)
)
3
.
Then the LHS. It has one zero(root):
3
2
. The coefficient of
x
2
is 9. So
9
(
x
+
3
2
)
2
=
(
x
+
(
3
2
5
−
1
)
)
3
⇒
(
x
+
(
3
2
5
−
1
)
)
3
9
(
x
+
3
2
)
2
.
We want to take the -1 from the
3
2
5
−
1
away to make
2
5
after cubing. So we test
x
=
1
.
Bingo! It matches!
So the answer is
1
.
Uniqueness | 5 | Common approach, and brute force method, as you tested the value of x as 1, but you used Pascal Triangle |
Latex | 8 | Latex the text, otherwise it looks a bit boring |
No Mistakes | 10 | Correct answer and no mistakes |
Clarity | 2 | Most things haven't been explained clearly, like the second equation |
Time | 10 | First solution |
@Jeff Giff 's Total | 35 | Nice! |
Log in to reply
@Percy Jackson , if you wouldn't mind, could you L A T E X up the x in the last line?
Thanks in advance
Wait Percy, just realised that my solution used the Pascal’s triangle to factorise so it’s unique, but yeah, the brute force wasn’t the best approach.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
9 x 2 + 1 2 x + 4 = x 3 + 3 x 2 ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) + 3 x ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 + ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 ( 3 x ) 2 + 2 ( 3 x ) ( 2 ) + 2 2 = x 3 + 3 x 2 ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) + 3 x ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 + ( 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 ( 3 x + 2 ) 2 = ( x + 3 2 5 − 1 ) 3 ∵ a 2 + 2 a b + b 2 = ( a + b ) 2 ; a 3 + 3 a b + 3 a b 2 + b 3 = ( a + b ) 3 3 x + 2 = ( x + 3 2 5 − 1 ) 2 3 . . . . . . . . [ 1 ] Let α = x + 3 2 5 − 1 ⇒ x = α − 3 2 5 + 1 . . . . . . . . . . [ 2 ] ⇒ 3 x + 2 = 3 α − 3 3 2 5 + 3 + 2 = 3 α − 3 3 2 5 + 5 Putting this in [ 1 ] 3 α − 3 3 2 5 + 5 = α 2 3 3 α − 3 3 2 5 + 5 = α α 3 α − α α = 3 3 2 5 − 5
α ( 3 − α ) = 3 2 5 ( 3 − 3 2 5 5 )
α ( 3 − α ) = 3 2 5 ( 3 − 3 2 5 ) ∵ 3 2 5 5 = 5 3 2 5 = 5 1 − 3 2 = 5 3 1 = ( ( 5 3 1 ) 2 ) 2 1 = − + 5 3 2 = 3 5 2 = 3 2 5 Comparing both the sides of the above equation we get α = 3 2 5 From [ 2 ] x = 3 2 5 − 3 2 5 + 1 = 1