Misshapen Brownie

Geometry Level 1

I came back from letting my brownies cool to find that some crazy individual had cut themselves a huge rectangular piece out of the middle of my brownie. The piece does not even align with the tray. Is it still possible to use a single straight cut, that is perpendicular to this surface of the brownie, to cut the remaining brownie area into two pieces of equal area?

If not, prove why not. If it's possible, how can you do it?

Nope, at least two cuts that aren't on the same line will be required. Yes, it's possible.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Chung Kevin
Oct 16, 2015

If two people want equal shares of the remaining brownie, then the line that goes through the middle of the original brownie rectangle and the middle of the hole rectangle will cut the remaining brownie area in half.

Proof: Any line through the middle of a rectangle cuts that rectangle in half, due to rotational symmetry. Therefore, the line through both the middle of the brownie rectangle and the middle of the hole rectangle will result in each person getting half of the original brownie area and half of the hole area. Therefore, each person will get equal amounts of the misshapen brownie area.

Or you could take the whole thing out of the pan and cut it in half so one person gets the top half and one person gets the bottom half. That way they would have identical pieces :)

Mike Pearce - 5 years, 7 months ago

I thought that 'equal' means same shape......

展豪 張 - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Ah... Sorry about that. I've edited the problem.

Chung Kevin - 5 years, 7 months ago

brilliant solution

rajdeep das - 4 years, 11 months ago

It would be a brilliant solution, but the problem says "vertical cut". This solution does not apply. You can have the general solution, with Ville Karlsson's one, or the practical and simple (but smart) solution from Alexey.

Diego Valenzuela - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh, let me clarify what "vertical cut" means. I was thinking of cutting vertically through the brownies (as opposed of down the image), while not allowing a horizontal cut through the brownies which would allow for a top and bottom half.

The Intermediate Value Theorem approach is really nice :)

Chung Kevin - 3 years, 4 months ago
Ville Karlsson
Feb 8, 2016

It can also be shown by continuity. Informally: integrate area from left (x=0) to right (x=a) . This is clearly continuous, and has values from 0 to whole area, so by the intermediate value theorem the result follows

Following the expression in the question, "vertical cut", I think it implies to divide the remaining part of brownie vertically. It should be possible, and thanks to Ville Karlssons (https://brilliant.org/profile/ville-ndy6hy) for the idea of intermediate value theorem, it was on my mind too, when I arrived at my solution. Measure the length and width of cut part and whole brownie, work out the areas. Subtract smaller area from the larger area. Half the difference. Divide the result by the width of tray (actual brownie) and get the length, which you need to measure from the left edge, to cut off. In result left part (full rectangle) will have the same area as right part with cut hole in it. Square of ratio of lengths of final two parts should be the same as ratio of areas of these parts.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...