Maybe binary numeral system could help...

Let n n be a positive integer.

Denote by a ( n ) a(n) the number of ways n n can be written in the form of n = x 1 + x 2 + , n=x_1+x_2+\cdots, where for every i , i, we have x i x i + 1 x_i \leq x_{i+1} (except the last term) and x i = 2 k i 1 x_i=2^{k_i}-1 for some positive integer k i . k_i.

Denote by b ( n ) b(n) the number of ways n n can be written in the form of n = y 1 + y 2 + , n=y_1+y_2+\cdots, where for every i , i, y i y_i is a positive integer and 2 y i y i + 1 2y_i \leq y_{i+1} (except the last term).

Which of the following statemens is true?

a ( n ) > b ( n ) a(n)>b(n) a ( n ) = b ( n ) a(n)=b(n) a ( n ) < b ( n ) a(n)<b(n) There isn't any determinable connection between a ( n ) a(n) and b ( n ) b(n)

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Sándor Daróczi
Sep 26, 2017

We are going to prove the answer by showing that a bijection exists between the possible arrangements in a ( n ) a(n) and b ( n ) b(n) . For this, let us encode every construction in a ( n ) a(n) in the following way:

Firstly, convert every x i x_i to its binary form and write them into i i rows (the i i th row containing x i x_i ) such that their first digits are below each other. Since all x i x_i 's are in the form of 2 k i 1 2^{k_i}-1 for positive integers k i k_i , their binary form consists only of 1's. Moreover, from the condition x i x i + 1 x_i \leq x_{i+1} it is evident that the i + 1 i+1 th row must contain at least as much digits as the i i th. Finally, let us assign a unique value to every digit which represents the amount it contributes to the value of its corresponding x i x_i ; this can be achieved by defining the value of a certain digit to be 2 l 2^l if the number of digits in the same row which are on the right hand side of the digit appears to be l l . A clear consequence of this assigment is the fact that x i x_i is equal to the sum of the values of digits in the i i th row.

Now we seek to show that if we add together the digit's values in every column instead of row, we obtain a proper construction in b ( n ) b(n) . Indeed, denoting the sum of the values in the i i th row from the right by y i y_i it is apparent that the condition y i + 1 2 y i y_{i+1} \geq 2y_i is met, since every digit corresponding to y i y_i has a neighbouring digit from the left with twice as much value that is contained in y i + 1 y_{i+1} . Moreover, as the sums n = x 1 + x 2 + n=x_1+x_2+\ldots and y 1 + y 2 + y_1+y_2+\ldots both can be calculated by summing up the values of every digit in the construction, it follows that n = y 1 + y 2 + n=y_1+y_2+\ldots . Henceforth, we have found an injection from a ( n ) a(n) to b ( n ) b(n) .

It suffices to show that this injection is a one-to-one mapping. We'll prove it by correlating every n = y 1 + y 2 + n=y_1+y_2+\ldots arrangement to a unique n = x 1 + x 2 + n=x_1+x_2+\ldots arrangement such that the latter is corresponding to the former according to our injective reasoning. We proceed by the following:

Place y 1 y_1 number of 1's in a column. If i i number of columns have already been constructed, we add the ( i + 1 ) (i+1) st by writing 1's on the left side of every digit in the i i th column, and y i + 1 2 y i y_{i+1}-2y_i number of 1's over them in addition (note that this can always be accomplished in view of y i + 1 2 y i y_{i+1} \geq 2y_i ). After completing the construction, let all of the digits be given the same defined value as formerly. Finally, observe that the sum of values of 1's in the i i th column from the right equals to y i y_i for every i i , and if the values are summed up in every row we end up with a proper n = x 1 + x 2 + n=x_1+x_2+\ldots arrangement which corresponds to the b ( n ) b(n) construction we started with. That's exactly what we wanted to show.

Hence, our proof is complete.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...