Messing around in higher dimensions 2

Geometry Level 5

2D: The 3 3 lengths 3 , 4 , 5 3,4,5 can be arranged to form a triangle with integer area.

3D: The 6 6 lengths 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 6,7,8,9,10,11 can be arranged to form a tetrahedron with integer volume (note the arrangement matters - not every tetrahedron with these edge-lengths has integer volume)

4D: Can the 10 10 lengths 12 , 13 , , 21 12,13,\cdots,21 be arranged to form a pentachoron with integer hypervolume?

If they can, then enter this hypervolume as your answer. If not, find the smallest achievable hypervolume with these edge-lengths, and enter the nearest integer to this minimum hypervolume.

Hint: one approach is to use this formula


The answer is 7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Yuriy Kazakov
Mar 14, 2020

I used combinatorial enumeration of options with Python.
P.S. Fine same problem exist for the 10 lengths 10 , 11 , . . . , 19 10,11,...,19 . Try this.

You're right, Kazakov, for 10 lengths 10 , 11 , . . . , 19 10,11,...,19 there does exist an unique integer volume. For hot rod fans, it's the same number as one particular Ford V-8 engine block series.

Michael Mendrin - 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Probably a coincidence...

Are those the shortest consecutive integer edge-lengths that give an integer hypervolume?

Chris Lewis - 1 year, 2 months ago

I went about this the same way (brute-force permutations using the Cayley-Menger determinant). The range of possible hypervolumes is quite surprising (from around 7 7 to around 1454 1454 ).

I wonder if there's a number-theoretical approach to showing no integer hypervolumes exist?

Chris Lewis - 1 year, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...