Midpoint of a midpoint, then what?

Geometry Level 2

A B AB is 60 units long. C C is the midpoint of A B AB . D D is the midpoint of C B CB . E E is twice as far from B B as it is from D D such that it is between D B DB . F F is four times as far from C C as it is from A A . Find F C + D E FC + DE .

Note: This problem is taken from the Mathizen Question of the Day.


The answer is 29.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Michael Mendrin
May 21, 2014

This does 't have an unique solution. E could be at C, so that EB = 2ED, since CB = 15, CD = 30. The other "correct answer" would be 39.

Thank you for the comment. I have already edited the problem. :D

Leonblum Iznotded
Jul 25, 2018

Everything is on the same (infinite) line, isn't it ? So...

Let us create algebraic landmark. A(0,0) is the origin ; B(60;0) (on the right, in alphabetic order, not very original i am...)

By construction C(30;0). (Every notice that A C = C B = 30 \overline{AC} = \overline{CB} = 30 )

By construction C D = 15 = D B \overline{CD}=15=\overline{DB}

Instead of your "E is twice as far from B as it is from D such that it is between DB." i would have proposed "E is on segment [DB] so that EB=2ED." Reader has the work to interprete " E B = E D \overrightarrow{EB}=-\overrightarrow{ED} "

Till on quick scheme (i do not scan, but imagine everybody draw the same scheme or sketch, a "plan coté" = "Bemassung" = "quotatura") we note E on a segment with D E = 5 a n d E B = 10 \overline{DE}=5 and \overline{EB}=10 .

"[Still on the same segment [AC],] F is four times as far from C as it is from A" (it would be lighter and simpler in algebraic notation : F C = 4 F A \overline{FC}=-4\overline{FA} ). We conclude A F = 6 \overline{AF}=6 and F C = 24 \overline{FC}=24 . (If we are rigorous, it can be proven by Chasles relation : F C = 4 F A = > F A + A C = 4 F A = > A C = 5 F A \overline{FC}=-4\overline{FA} => \overline{FA}+\overline{AC}=-4\overline{FA} => \overline{AC}=-5\overline{FA} . So A F \overline{AF} is one fifth of A C \overline{AC} : +30/5=6 ; F is on the right of A, at 6 units from A, 24 from C.)

This exercise is not tricky : we read FC + DE = F C + D E \overline{FC}+\overline{DE} (all these one-dimension vectors disguised in algebraic measures are turned to the right) = 24+5 = 29. The reading of the scheme, the sketch *replaces * the one-D vectors - like on a good building plan.

It would have been more difficult if there was a trap (philosophical or geometrical...)

PS i have not the courage to read the final version after all this Latexification... Please tell me if i caused a 'typist mistake' i will correct as i can in possible...

Leonblum Iznotded - 2 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...