Given that x > y and x y = 1 , the minimum value of x − y x 2 + y 2 can be expressed as a . Find a .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Who is Temulen? Great question :)
You should ensure that equality can be achieved. Otherwise, you only have a lower bound, and it might not be the greatest lower bound (IE Minimum).
Exactly same, i was thinking of posting the solution but you.......
Nice problem, Alan! I have a challenge for you guys too. Like Alan, which wants you to now solve for x and y from x − y = 2 , x y = 1 Since we now know the solution, try starting from scratch and doing the problem in reverse starting with the answer. See if you can solve for x and y from the initial x − y x 2 + y 2 Make sure to show your work!
Given: x y = 1 and x > y
We need to first realize that any number
x
, where
x
>
0
, will satisfy the above where
y
=
x
1
If
x
is negative,
y
would also need to be negative, but since
x
>
y
, there is no
y
which would support a negative value for
x
.
How do we approach this? We can start off by plugging in different values for x and y , to get a sense of what our answer will look like. Remembering y = x 1 , we can write our equation like this:
Let
b
=
a
f
(
x
)
=
m
i
n
{
x
−
x
−
1
x
2
+
x
−
2
}
=
b
f ( 2 ) = ( 2 ) − ( 2 1 ) ( 2 ) 2 + ( 2 1 ) 2 = 6 1 7 = 2 . 8 3
Ok, now let's try to get a lower result:
f ( 3 ) = ( 3 ) − ( 3 1 ) ( 3 ) 2 + ( 3 1 ) 2 = 1 2 4 1 = 3 . 4 1 6
Oops, wrong direction, let's return to our f ( 2 ) and go lower. Since we know x cannot be 1, let's try going to the midpoint between 1 and 2 which is 1 2 1 .
f ( 1 2 1 ) = ( 2 3 ) − ( 3 2 ) ( 2 3 ) 2 + ( 3 2 ) 2 = 3 0 9 7 = 3 . 2 3
Closer than f ( 3 ) but our f ( 2 ) was closer. Our 2 value seems to be about spot-on. And after fiddling with this problem for a while, since I'm not willing to throw in the towel when I solve problems like this all the time with my programmer skills, I decided since I've been brute forcing it already, let me brute force it with JavaScript's help, because I'm a programmer for crying out loud.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
|
In chrome this yields:
x≈1.932
a≈8.000000141498505
And close enough to get the answer right, so I punched in 8 and got it right.
If you want to know the value where
x
is exactly 8, the answer is
2
3
+
1
.
How did I get this answer? I solved Alan Yan's equation in the answers. I won't show my work for that though so you can test your knowledge. But you can validate it in JavaScript like so:
1 2 3 |
|
Call it cheating if you will, I didn't give up and got it right. And to make up for it, not seeing an easy approach in the answers already, I posted this answer. Hope others find it useful.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x − y x 2 + y 2 = x − y + x − y 2 ≥ 2 2 = 8 (AM - GM)
Equality holds when x − y = 2 , x y = 1 These two equations are solvable. Here is some extra algebra practice, find the equality case!