Suppose you have 1000 meters of fencing material. You set out to build a closed circular fence and a closed square fence, as shown above. The circular fence is partitioned into 4 quadrants by two perpendicular diameter sections.
If all of the fencing material must be used, what is the minimum possible combined area enclosed by the two fences (in square meters, to the nearest square meter)?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
For completeness, I've added in the "second derivative test" line in your solution.
x = length of wire bent into a circle
1000 - x = length of wire bent into a square
x = π d + 2 d
d = π + 2 x
A = 4 π ( π + 1 2 x ) 2 + ( 4 1 0 0 0 − x ) 2
A = 0 . 0 2 9 7 0 9 x 2 + 1 6 ( 1 0 0 0 − x ) 2
d x d A = 0 . 0 5 9 4 1 8 x − 8 1 0 0 0 − x = 0
x = 6 7 7 . 8 0 4 7 4 7 1
d = 1 3 1 . 8 2 7 7 8 0 4
A = 1 3 6 4 9 . 0 9 1 9 9 + 6 4 8 8 . 1 1 1 3 1 2 = 2 0 1 3 7 . 2 0 3 3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Optimization
Let r be the radius of the circle and a be the side length of the square.
Recall the perimeter of a circle and a square can be expressed as 2 π r and 4 a , respectively.
Then we can set up the following equation regarding the fence used:
( 2 π r + 4 r ) + 4 a = 1 0 0 0
Changing the subject to a gives a = 2 5 0 − ( 1 + 2 π ) r .
The combined area:
A = r 2 π + a 2 = r 2 π + ( 2 5 0 − ( 1 + 0 . 5 π ) r ) 2
An easy way to find the minimal area is by differentiating (using the chain rule):
d R d A = 2 r π − 2 ( 2 5 0 − ( 1 + 0 . 5 π ) r ) ( 1 + 0 . 5 π )
2 r π − 2 ( 2 5 0 − ( 1 + 0 . 5 π ) r ) ( 1 + 0 . 5 π π ) = 0
r = 2 π + 2 ( 1 + 0 . 5 π ) 2 5 0 0 ( 1 + 0 . 5 π ) ≈ 6 5 . 9 1 3 8 9 m
Substituting this value back into our formulae regarding a and A, we get:
a ≈ 8 0 . 5 4 8 8 1 m
and
A min = 2 0 1 3 7 . 2 0 3 3 1 m 2 = 2 0 1 3 7 m 2 (0 d. p.) .
By the second derivative test , we can show that d R 2 d 2 A ∣ ∣ ∣ r ≈ 6 5 . 9 1 3 8 9 > 0 , so the extremal point that we have found is indeed the minimum value.