Minimum perimeter

Geometry Level 5

As shown, A B C ABC is an equilateral triangle of side length 10. The points D , E D, E and F F on B C , A B BC, AB and A C AC respectively with D B = 2 DB=2 . Let s = D E + E F + F D s= DE+EF+FD . Find the minimum value of 100 s \lfloor 100s\rfloor .


The answer is 1587.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Chan Lye Lee
May 19, 2016

Relevant wiki: Reflection

Reflect the triangle A B C ABC and the point D D along the side A B AB . The reflection of D D marked as D D' . Note that D E = D E DE=D'E .

Reflect the triangle A B C ABC and the point D D along the side A C AC . The reflection of D D marked as D 1 D'_1 . Note that F D = F D 1 FD=FD'_1 .

Now D E + E F + F D = D E + E F + F D 1 DE+EF+FD=D'E+EF+FD'_1 , which the minimum length is clearly the same as D D 1 D'D'_1 .

It is not difficult to calculate that G D = 8 + 5 2 cos 6 0 = 12 GD'=8+5-2\cos 60^{\circ} = 12 and that G D 1 = 12 sin 6 0 = 6 3 GD'_1=12\sin 60 ^{\circ}=6\sqrt{3} . Hence s = D D 1 = 6 7 s=D'D'_1=6\sqrt{7} and thus 100 s = 600 7 = 1587 \lfloor 100s\rfloor =\lfloor 600\sqrt{7}\rfloor =1587

Rahul Dewani
May 21, 2016

The only point pivoted for triangle DEF is D. Think of the triangle as being composed of a single thread curled across bars AB and AC. As you pull the thread harder, the perimeter reduces. As a consequence something else happens as well. The angle of incidence of thread on the bar will be equal to the angle of reflection, when the perimeter is minimum. The angles have been labled as θ \theta and ϕ \phi .

Now using the property that sum of all angles of a triangle is 18 0 o 180^o , we have, θ + ϕ = 12 0 o \theta + \phi = 120^o . The remining angles are then found in terms of θ \theta and ϕ \phi as shown in figure.

It can be seen that there are 3 similar triangles in the picture, in the following order,

CDF ~ BED ~ AEF

The sides of a normalised triangle, also similar to these triangles are assumed to be in the ratio 1 : a : b.

All sides in the figure can be found in terms of the assumed ratios as demonstrated,

we also have, A F / A E = a AF/AE = a from the properties of similar triangles. Substituting values of AF and AE from figure and solving, we get,

a = 2/3

To find b, cosine law is used,

b 2 = 1 2 + ( 2 / 3 ) 2 2. ( 2 / 3 ) . 1. c o s ( 6 0 o ) b^2 = 1^2 + (2/3)^2-2.(2/3).1.cos(60^o)

on solving,

b = 7 / 3 b = \sqrt7 / 3

The three sides of the triangle are found to be, 3 7 / 3 , 7 7 / 3 , 8 7 / 3 3*\sqrt7 / 3, 7*\sqrt7 / 3, 8*\sqrt7 / 3 .

Thus, perimeter = 6. 7 6. \sqrt7

Moderator note:

Good intuition, but you should still explain why these must hold. For example, you should say "When D and E are fixed, then to minimize the distance DF+FE, we can use the reflection principle to show that the 2 angles are equal".

The reason is that you haven't fully explained why there can't be multiple local minima where the "pulled string" cannot be tightened further. For example, if the edge was a curvy line instead, then the "pulled string" analogy no longer applies.

An interesting 'physical' approach! (+1)

展豪 張 - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

Thank you! :)

Rahul Dewani - 5 years ago
Ahmad Saad
May 20, 2016

I did the same way.

Niranjan Khanderia - 5 years ago
Huân Lê Quang
May 25, 2016

I used the coordinate system, despite it is quite brutal and a lot of "tough" equations! Assume that the coordinate of A A is ( 0 , 0 ) \left( 0,0 \right) , then the corresponding coordinates of B B and C C are ( 10 , 0 ) \left( 10,0 \right) and ( 5 , 5 3 ) \left( 5,5\sqrt { 3 } \right) , respectively.

It is obvious that D H = 3 DH=\sqrt { 3 } and A H = 9 AH=9 (because A B = 10 AB=10 and B H = 1 BH=1 , therefore, the coordinate of D D is ( 9 , 3 ) (9,\sqrt { 3 } ) . Next, because F F lies on side A C AC of equilateral triangle A B C ABC , so F F have a coordinate of ( m , 3 m ) (m,\sqrt { 3 } m) , for real number m m satisfies 0 < m < 5 0<m<5 . Beside that, the coordinate of E E is ( n , 0 ) (n,0) for real number n n satisfies 0 < n < 10 0<n<10 .

By the distance formula:

D E = ( 9 n ) 2 + ( 3 0 ) 2 DE=\sqrt { (9-n)^{ 2 }+(\sqrt { 3 } -0)^{ 2 } }

D F = ( 9 m ) 2 + ( 3 3 m ) 2 DF=\sqrt { (9-m)^{ 2 }+(\sqrt { 3 } -\sqrt { 3 } m)^{ 2 } }

E F = ( n m ) 2 + ( 0 3 m ) 2 EF=\sqrt { (n-m)^{ 2 }+(0-\sqrt { 3 } m)^{ 2 } }

So

s = D E + D F + E F = ( 9 n ) 2 + ( 3 0 ) 2 + ( 9 m ) 2 + ( 3 3 m ) 2 + ( n m ) 2 + ( 0 3 m ) 2 s\quad =\quad DE+DF+EF\quad =\quad \sqrt { (9-n)^{ 2 }+(\sqrt { 3 } -0)^{ 2 } } +\sqrt { (9-m)^{ 2 }+(\sqrt { 3 } -\sqrt { 3 } m)^{ 2 } } +\sqrt { (n-m)^{ 2 }+(0-\sqrt { 3 } m)^{ 2 } }

We use caluclus here: Define the function f ( m , n ) = ( 9 n ) 2 + ( 3 0 ) 2 + ( 9 m ) 2 + ( 3 3 m ) 2 + ( n m ) 2 + ( 0 3 m ) 2 f(m,n)=\sqrt { (9-n)^{ 2 }+(\sqrt { 3 } -0)^{ 2 } } +\sqrt { (9-m)^{ 2 }+(\sqrt { 3 } -\sqrt { 3 } m)^{ 2 } } +\sqrt { (n-m)^{ 2 }+(0-\sqrt { 3 } m)^{ 2 } } .

In order to minimize the value of the function, then the partial derivatives of the function must equal zero, simultaneously:

f m ( m , n ) = 4 m n 4 m 2 2 m n + n 2 + 2 m 6 m 2 6 m + 21 = 0 f_{ m }(m,n)=\quad \frac { 4m-n }{ \sqrt { 4{ m }^{ 2 }-2mn+n^{ 2 } } } +\frac { 2m-6 }{ \sqrt { { m }^{ 2 }-6m+21 } }=0

f n ( m , n ) = n m 4 m 2 2 m n + n 2 + n 9 n 2 18 n + 84 = 0 f_{ n }(m,n)=\quad \frac { n-m }{ \sqrt { 4{ m }^{ 2 }-2mn+{ n }^{ 2 } } } +\frac { n-9 }{ \sqrt { { n }^{ 2 }-18n+84 } }=0

Solving the above system of equations yields m = 7 3 m=\frac { 7 }{ 3 } , n = 7 n=7 , satisfy the conditions above.

Plus the recently-found values into the formula for s s , then s = 6 7 s=6\sqrt { 7 } . Therefore 100 s = 600 7 = 1587.450787... = 1587 \left\lfloor 100s \right\rfloor =\left\lfloor 600\sqrt { 7 } \right\rfloor =\left\lfloor 1587.450787... \right\rfloor =1587 .

Moderator note:

Do you see how to go from your equation of s s , to the reflection approach used by Chan Lye Lee? Taking the geometric interpretation of these expressions often provides a more intuitive understanding.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...