Minimum Road Width

A road is m m meters wide( m m is an integer),there are lampposts at both sides of the road.

The lampposts are equally spaced(space = n =n meters, n n is an integer) on each side of the road.

I am standing on the east side of the road,under a lamppost P 0 P_0 .

There is another lamppost P P' on the west side across from me ( P 0 P = m \overline{P_0P'}=m ).

I walked north to the next lamppost P 1 P_1 ,and discovered that the distance P 1 P \overline{P_1P'} is an integer.

I keep walking north to one of the lamppost P x P_x ,and discovered that the distance P x P \overline{P_xP'} is an integer,too.

What is the minimum width m m of the road(in meters)?

Note that I keep walking on the east side of the road.

Picture Source:From Jeremy Galvagni.


Try my set here


The answer is 12.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

David Vreken
Aug 7, 2018

Both P P 0 P 1 \triangle P'P_0P_1 and P P 0 P x \triangle P'P_0P_x are right triangles with integer sides, so we need two sets of Pythagorean triples with the same leg P 0 P = m P_0P' = m and the other leg ( P 0 P x P_0P_x ) that is a multiple of the first ( P 0 P 1 = n P_0P_1 = n ).

The Pythagorean triples ( 5 , 12 , 13 ) (5, 12, 13) and ( 12 , 35 , 37 ) (12, 35, 37) meet the criteria with m = 12 m = 12 , n = 5 n = 5 , and P 0 P x = 5 7 = 35 P_0P_x = 5 \cdot 7 = 35 .

This is also the smallest possible value for m m by looking at a complete list of Pythagorean triples found here . Pythagorean triples with legs of 1 1 and 2 2 do not exist, and the Pythagorean triples with legs 3 3 , 4 4 , 5 5 , 6 6 , 7 7 , 10 10 , and 11 11 only appear once. A leg of 8 8 appears twice ( ( 6 , 8 , 10 ) (6, 8, 10) and ( 8 , 15 , 17 ) (8, 15, 17) ) but 15 15 is not a multiple of 6 6 , and a leg of 9 9 appears twice ( ( 9 , 12 , 15 ) (9, 12, 15) and ( 9 , 40 , 41 ) (9, 40, 41) ) but 40 40 is not a multiple of 12 12 . By elimination this means that the smallest possible value of m m is m = 12 m = \boxed{12} .

Why not m=0 a solution? It's not told in the problem that m>0

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

When describing a measurement of a physical object (such as the width of the road), it's typically assumed to be positive.

David Vreken - 2 years, 3 months ago
Jeremy Galvagni
Aug 8, 2018

I can't do better than @David Vreken's solution, and I'm not a moderator, but here's a nice picture you can copy and insert in your problem.

Thank you very much!!

X X - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

No troubles. Now if you edit the problem you can change the link slightly. Change the word center to either left or right and it will shift the picture and place the text to the side.

Jeremy Galvagni - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the imformation!I didn't know this before.

X X - 2 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...