m and n be positive integers such that
Let1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1
Find the least value of n .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
HOW DID YOU CAME TO KNOW THE MIN VALUE IS 7 . I AM ACTUALLY CONFUSED. CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN IT IN A BIT EASIER WAY !!!!
Log in to reply
He narrowed it down so that he don't have to check so many possible cases. So he starts with n= 2, then n= 3, n = 4, ... n = 6 which all yield no solution. Then with n = 7 VoILA!
For n = 1
0 < 1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1 < 1
For n = 2
2 1 = 1 0 5 < 1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1 < 2 2
For n = 3
3 2 < 1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1 < 3 3
For n = 4
4 2 < 1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1 < 4 3
For n = 5
5 3 < 1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1 < 5 4
For n = 6
6 4 < 1 0 7 < n m < 1 5 1 1 < 6 5
Finally, for n = 7
7 0 4 9 < 7 0 5 0 and 7 0 5 0 = 1 0 5 7 5 < 1 0 5 7 7
The minimum value for n is n = 7
The range of the interval [ 1 0 7 ; 1 5 1 1 ] is 3 0 1 . So 3 1 is necessarily an upper bound for n . But to guess what happens to lower values for n the only idea I get right now is to check one by one....
Nice solution! I found it in the exact way. Yet I guess there must be some other shorter way, though. Where did you find this problem?
Log in to reply
I have not found a shorter way to solve it (I will try to find it). I found this problem in my notes.
i LIKE YOUR ANSWER . EVEN I ALSO DID LIKE THIS . BUT THIS METHOD IS A LENGHIER ONE AND WILL KILL OUR TIME IN COMPRTITIVE EXAMS . SO CAN YOU SUGGEST AN EASY METHOD . PLEASE !!!!
Multiply all expressions by 30n . The inequality remains valid as 30n is positive. It now becomes: 2 1 n < 3 0 m < 2 2 n ∴ 2 1 n < 3 0 m < 2 1 n + n This simply means that we have to find the first multiple of 30 that occurs between 21n and 21n+n , for some smallest integer n . For that, we just have to analyze the table of 21 : 2 1 ↔ 2 2 4 2 ↔ 4 4 6 3 ↔ 6 6 8 4 ↔ 8 8 1 0 5 ↔ 1 1 0 1 2 6 ↔ 1 3 2 1 4 7 ↔ 1 5 4 1 5 0 = 5 × 3 0 There! 150 , a multiple of 30 lies between the 7th multiples of 21 and 22 . Thus, we have m=5 and n=7 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
You could use the fact that if you have a fraction less than 1 then: n m < n + 1 m + 1 (which can be seen by croos multiplying to obtain m < n ). Now appling this to both sides: 1 1 8 ≤ n m ≤ 7 5 However, this step cannot be repeated otherwise we obtain 4 3 ≤ n m ≤ 3 2 ∴ m i n ( n ) = 7