Given that A = ∫ − 1 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x
Find ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 A ⌋
Note: m o d ( a , b ) = c where 0 ≤ c < a and a − c = k b for some integer k .
Try my Other Problems
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Did you mean ζ rather than ξ in your appendix?
Log in to reply
Yeah..... I could not find the latex for it, thanks!
This is what we need to find -
A = ∫ − 1 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x
Now, as it is obvious that m o d ( a , b ) = c → a − c = k b → c = a − k b
where k = ⌊ b a ⌋
Hence, m o d ( x , x 2 ) = x − ⌊ x 2 x ⌋ x 2 = x − ⌊ x 1 ⌋ x 2
A = ∫ − 1 1 x − ⌊ x 1 ⌋ x 2 d x
A = 0 − ∫ − 1 1 ⌊ x 1 ⌋ x 2 d x
Substituting u = x 1
A = ∫ − 1 1 ⌊ u ⌋ u 4 1 d u
A = 0 ∫ 0 1 u 4 1 d u + ( − 1 ) ∫ − 1 0 u 4 1 d u = 3 1
@Julian Poon Will you count this in as a correct solution?
how you said that k =[a/b]
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First of all, the graph y = m o d ( f ( x ) , g ( x ) ) would be the graph y = f ( x ) + n g ( x ) , bounded by the x-axis and the function g ( x ) where n ranges over all the integers, positive and negative and 0 , and that there will not be more than 1 value for y for a value of x . here is a simulation showing what I mean.
You can try proving that ^ yourself.
So, for the graph of m o d ( x , x 2 ) , it would be the graph y = x + n x 2 . bounded by the x-axis and the function x 2 .
Lets focus on ∫ 0 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x
The points at which y = x − n x 2 touch the x-axis can be easily derived to be x = n 1 , for all positive integer n more than 0 . Note that for now it is y = x − n x 2 instead of y = x + n x 2 because I am using positive values of n .
Therefore, ∫ 0 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ n + 1 1 n 1 x − n x 2 d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 6 n 2 ( n + 1 ) 3 3 n + 1
We would leave that mess for later.
Now lets focus on ∫ − 1 0 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x .
The points at which y = x + n x 2 touch the x-axis can be easily derived to be − n 1 , for all positive integers n more than 1 . However, we will be leaving out the graph for when n = 1 || x + x 2 because it does not interfere in the of x = − 1 to x = 1 in the graph y = m o d ( f ( x ) , g ( x ) ) .
Therefore, ∫ − 1 0 m o d ( x , x 2 ) = n = 2 ∑ ∞ ∫ − n − 1 1 − n 1 x + n x 2 d x = n = 2 ∑ ∞ 6 n 2 ( n − 1 ) 3 3 n − 1
Summing them together:
∫ − 1 0 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x + ∫ 0 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x = ∫ − 1 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 6 n 2 ( n + 1 ) 3 3 n + 1 + n = 2 ∑ ∞ 6 n 2 ( n − 1 ) 3 3 n − 1 = n = 2 ∑ ∞ 6 n 2 ( n − 1 ) 3 3 n − 1 + n = 2 ∑ ∞ 6 ( n − 1 ) 2 ( n ) 3 3 ( n − 1 ) + 1 = n = 2 ∑ ∞ ( 3 ( n − 1 ) 3 1 − 3 n 3 1 )
And look! A telescoping series!
Evaluating that gives ∫ − 1 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x = 3 1
Additional:
∫ − 1 0 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x = 6 1 n = 2 ∑ ∞ ( n 2 1 ) − 6 1 n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 2 1 ) + 3 1 n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 3 1 ) = 6 1 ( 6 π 2 − 1 ) − 3 6 π 2 + 3 ζ ( 3 ) = 3 ζ ( 3 ) − 6 1
∫ 0 1 m o d ( x , x 2 ) d x = 6 1 n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( n 2 1 ) − 6 1 n = 2 ∑ ∞ ( n 2 1 ) − 3 1 n = 2 ∑ ∞ ( n 3 1 ) = − 6 1 ( 6 π 2 − 1 ) + 3 6 π 2 − 3 ζ ( 3 ) + 3 1 = 2 1 − 3 ζ ( 3 )