More fun in 2015, Part 14

Algebra Level 5

1 m < n 2015 ( w m + w n ) \left|\prod_{1\leq{m}<n\leq{2015}}(w_m+w_n)\right| If w 1 , . . . , w 2015 w_1,...,w_{2015} are the 2015-th roots of unity, find the value of the expression above.

Extra Credit Question: Find m < n ( w m + w n ) \prod_{m<n}(w_m+w_n) , not just the absolute value.


The answer is 1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Paul Sherman
Jun 2, 2015

We'll need to use the identities m w m = 1 \prod\limits_m w_m = 1 and m ( 1 + w m ) = 2 \prod\limits_m (1 + w_m) = 2 which can be verified by evaluating the polynomial m ( x w m ) = x 2015 1 \prod\limits_m (x - w_m)= x^{2015} - 1 at x = 0 x = 0 and at x = 1 x = -1 . For ease of notation I mean here for the indices of any products to run from 1 1 to 2015 2015 , inclusive, unless otherwise specified.

Letting X = m < n ( w m + w n ) X = \prod\limits_{m<n} (w_m+w_n) note that m n ( w m + w n ) = m = n ( w m + w n ) m < n ( w m + w n ) m > n ( w m + w n ) = 2 2015 X 2 . \prod_m \prod_n (w_m + w_n) = \prod_{m=n} (w_m+w_n) \prod_{m < n} (w_m + w_n) \prod_{m>n}(w_m+w_n) = 2^{2015} X^2.

On the other hand, m n ( w m + w n ) = m w m n ( 1 + w n w m 1 ) = m w m k ( 1 + w k ) = m 2 w m = 2 2015 . \prod_m \prod_n (w_m + w_n) = \prod_m w_m \prod_n (1 + w_n w_m^{-1}) = \prod_m w_m \prod_k (1+ w_k) = \prod_m 2w_m = 2^{2015}.

Comparing these two expressions gives X 2 = 1 X^2 = 1 , from which we conclude X = 1 |X| = 1 .

In response to Otto's challenge question: Let w m = e 2 π m i 2015 w_m = e^\frac{2 \pi m i}{2015} . Whenever m + n 2015 m + n \neq 2015 note that w m + w n w_m + w_n and its complex conjugate w m + w n = w 2015 m + w 2015 n w_m^* + w_n^* = w_{2015-m}+w_{2015-n} form a pair of distinct factors of the product X = m < n ( w m + w n ) X = \prod\limits_{m<n} (w_m+w_n) . Since positive real factors do not contribute to the argument of a product, we can discard those pairs and write the argument of X X as m ( X ) = m ( m = 1 1007 ( w m + w 2015 m ) ) = m ( m = 1 1007 ( w m + w m ) ) = m ( m = 1 1007 R e ( w m ) m(X) = m(\prod\limits_{m = 1}^{1007} (w_m + w_{2015-m})) = m(\prod\limits_{m = 1}^{1007} (w_m + w_m^*)) = m(\prod\limits_{m = 1}^{1007} Re(w_m) ). Thus X X is real and its sign is the product of the signs of the real parts of the first 1007 roots of unity. This, in turn, is ( 1 ) k (-1)^k , where k k is the number of roots of unity that lie in the second quadrant of the complex plane. Drawing a picture reveals k = 1007 2 k = \lceil \frac{1007}{2}\rceil = 554. So the sign of X X is ( 1 ) 554 = 1 (-1)^{554}=1 .

Following the above methods I found that if w 1 , , w T w_1, \ldots, w_T are the T t h T^{th} roots of unity then the product X = 1 m < n T ( w m + w n ) X = \prod\limits_{1 \leq m<n \leq T} (w_m+w_n) is equal to 1 when T 1 , 7 T \equiv 1, 7 (mod 8), is equal to -1 when T 3 , 5 T \equiv 3, 5 (mod 8), and is equal to 0 when T 0 , 2 , 4 , 6 T \equiv 0, 2, 4, 6 (mod 8).

Otto- thanks for a fantastic question with an interesting outcome!

Thank you for your elegant and careful solution; it has inspired me to pose a related question today. I'm sorry for the late reply; I try to stay away from Brilliant during the semester (I have taught summer school in the Boston area).

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 9 months ago
Carsten Meyer
Feb 18, 2019

Another approach to the problem (and the additional challenge) uses a special polynomial. For simplicity use the following shorthands

N : = 2015 , z : = e i 2 π N , Y : = 1 m < n N ( w m + w n ) \begin{aligned} N &:= 2015,\qquad z:=e^{i\frac{2\pi}{N}},\qquad Y:=\prod_{1\leq m<n\leq N}(w_m+w_n) \end{aligned}

Before getting started, let's take a look at a polynomial that wil help a lot:

p ( x ) : = ( 1 ) N ( x N 1 ) = ( 1 ) N 1 m N ( x z m ) = 1 m N ( z m x ) (*) 1 m N ( z m + z n ) = p ( z n ) = ( 1 ) N ( ( 1 ) N z N n 1 ) = 1 ( 1 ) N \begin{aligned} p(x)&:=(-1)^N(x^N-1)=(-1)^N\prod_{1\leq m\leq N}(x-z^m)=\prod_{1\leq m\leq N}(z^m-x)\\\\ \text{(*)}\qquad \prod_{1\leq m \leq N}(z^m+z^n)&=p(-z^n)=(-1)^N((-1)^Nz^{Nn}-1)=1-(-1)^N \end{aligned}

Now to the task. First, observe that the product Y Y is fully symmetrical in m , n m,\:n :

Y = 1 m < n N ( w m + w n ) = 1 m < n N ( w n + w m ) = m n 1 n < m N ( w m + w n ) Y 2 = 1 m n N ( w m + w n ) = 1 m ; n N ( w m + w n ) 1 m = n N ( w m + w n ) \begin{aligned} Y &= \prod_{1\leq m<n\leq N}(w_m+w_n) = \prod_{1\leq m<n\leq N}(w_n+w_m) \underset{m\leftrightarrow n}{=} \prod_{1\leq n<m\leq N}(w_m+w_n)\\\\ \Rightarrow\quad Y^2&=\prod_{1\leq m\neq n\leq N}(w_m+w_n)=\frac{ \displaystyle\prod_{1\leq m;\:n \leq N}(w_m+w_n) }{ \displaystyle\prod_{1\leq m=n\leq N}(w_m+w_n) } \end{aligned}

Notice how the last expression does not depend on the order of the roots anymore? From now on, we assume the standard order of the roots w n = z n w_n=z^n . Let's tackle numerator and denominator separately using ( ) (*) :

1 m ; n N ( w m + w n ) = 1 n N ( 1 m N ( z m + z n ) ) = (*) 1 n N ( 1 ( 1 ) N ) = ( 1 ( 1 ) N ) N 1 m = n N ( a m + a n ) = 0 m = n N 1 ( z m + z n ) = 1 m N ( 2 z ) m = 2 N z m = 1 N m = 2 N z N 2 ( N + 1 ) = 2 N e i 2 π N N 2 ( N + 1 ) = 2 N e i π ( N 1 ) = 2 N ( 1 ) N + 1 \begin{aligned} \prod_{1\leq m;\:n\leq N}(w_m+w_n)&=\prod_{1\leq n\leq N}\left( \prod_{1\leq m\leq N}(z^m+z^n) \right)\underset{\text{(*)}}{=}\prod_{1\leq n\leq N}(1-(-1)^N) = (1-(-1)^N)^N\\\\ \prod_{1\leq m=n\leq N}(a_m+a_n)&=\prod_{0\leq m=n\leq N-1}(z^m+z^n)=\prod_{1\leq m\leq N}(2z)^m = 2^Nz^{ \sum_{m=1}^{N}m }=2^Nz^{ \frac{N}{2}(N+1) } = 2^Ne^{i\frac{2\pi}{N}\cdot\frac{N}{2}(N+1)} = 2^Ne^{i\pi(N-1)} = 2^N(-1)^{N+1} \end{aligned}

With all that, we are nearly ready:

Y 2 = ( 1 ( 1 ) N ) N 2 N ( 1 ) N + 1 = { 0 , N even 1 , N odd \begin{aligned} Y^2=\frac{ (1-(-1)^N)^N }{2^N(-1)^{N+1}}=\begin{cases} 0,&N\text{ even}\\ 1,&N\text{ odd} \end{cases} \end{aligned}

We get |Y|=1 \fbox{|Y|=1} for N = 2015 N=2015 . Regarding the sign of Y Y , I'll refer to Paul Sherman's solution - mine was not nearly as neat!

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...