Find L = lo g ϕ ( n ) d ∣ n ∏ ϕ ( d ) for n = 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 5 .
Bonus Problem : Find this logarithm for any square-free n .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great observation of how to split out the terms.
If n has m distinct prime factors, then we are looking at choosing 1 to m of them to multiply to get a factor of n. If we choose k of them, then m k of them will multiply out till we get n .
Thus we are evaluating k = 1 ∑ m m k ( k m ) = 2 m − 1
Yes! I had done exactly the same!
But why to take only sq. free no.? @Otto Bretscher
Log in to reply
The problem does not look like a lot of fun when n isn't square-free ;)
What if we take totient of 1/d or d/phi(d)? @Otto Bretscher
Log in to reply
ϕ ( d 1 ) does not make sense... ϕ is defined for integers.
This solution will focus on n squarefree. Since n is squarefree, we may let n = i = 1 ∏ ω ( n ) p i , where ω ( n ) is the number of distinct prime factors of n.
"Zoning in" on a single factor p 1 , we can ask how many divisors of n have p 1 as a factor. If a divisor has m factors, one of which is p 1 , then we can choose m-1 other factors in ( m − 1 ω ( n ) − 1 ) ways. It is then easy to conclude that, in total, there are ( 1 − 1 ω ( n ) − 1 ) + ( 2 − 1 ω ( n ) − 1 ) + … + ( ω ( n ) − 1 ω ( n ) − 1 ) = 2 ω ( n ) − 1 divisors of n with p 1 ; an identical argument follows for all other p i .
Using the fact that ϕ is multiplicative, we may simply separate the factors of each divisor. Following this, we may observe that
d ∣ n ∏ ϕ ( d ) = i = 1 ∏ ω ( n ) ϕ ( p i ) 2 ω ( n ) − 1 = ⎣ ⎡ i = 1 ∏ ω ( n ) ϕ ( p i ) ⎦ ⎤ 2 ω ( n ) − 1 = ϕ ( n ) 2 ω ( n ) − 1 .
This implies, then, that (for ϕ ( n ) = 1 ),
lo g ϕ ( n ) ⎝ ⎛ d ∣ n ∏ ϕ ( d ) ⎠ ⎞ = lo g ϕ ( n ) ϕ ( n ) 2 ω ( n ) − 1 = 2 ω ( n ) − 1 .
Here, ω ( 2 0 1 4 × 2 0 1 5 ) = 6 so 2 ω ( n ) − 1 = 3 2 .
Note that this solution is not by any means rigorous, but more motivational of the thought process/method of solving than anything.
Log in to reply
It does not take much to make your argument rigorous. If n = p 1 p 2 … p K is a product of K distinct primes, then the divisors of n are numbers of the form d A = j ∈ A ∏ p j , A ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , K } . and hence d ∣ n ∏ ϕ ( d ) = A ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , K } ∏ ϕ ( d A ) = A ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , K } ∏ j ∈ A ∏ ( p j − 1 ) = j = 1 ∏ K ( p j − 1 ) N ( j ) where N ( j ) = ∣ ∣ { A ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , K } ∣ ∣ j ∈ A } ∣ ∣ = 2 K − 1 for each 1 ≤ j ≤ K . Thus d ∣ n ∏ ϕ ( d ) = j = 1 ∏ K ( p j − 1 ) 2 K − 1 = ϕ ( n ) 2 K − 1 and hence lo g ϕ ( n ) d ∣ n ∏ ϕ ( d ) = 2 K − 1 .
i did it the exact same way!did you try to generalize for all n?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We can group the divisors of a square-free integer n > 1 into (unordered) pairs d and n / d , with ϕ ( d ) ϕ ( n / d ) = ϕ ( n ) since ϕ is multiplicative. If τ ( n ) is the number of divisors of n , then there are τ ( n ) / 2 such pairs, so that ∏ d ∣ n ϕ ( d ) = ϕ ( n ) τ ( n ) / 2 and L = τ ( n ) / 2 . Note that τ ( n ) = 2 m if n has m prime factors.
In the case of n = 2 0 1 4 ∗ 2 0 1 5 we have m = 6 prime factors so that L = 2 5 = 3 2 .