z 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 )
How many (incongruent) solutions z does the above congruency have among the Gaussian integers Z [ i ] ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
If z 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 ) in Z [ i ] , then ( z − 1 ) ( z + 1 ) ( z − i ) ( z + i ) is divisible by ( 1 + i ) ( 1 − i ) ( 2 + i ) ( 2 − i ) = − i ( 1 + i ) 2 ( 2 + i ) ( 2 − i ) in the Gaussian integers, and 1 + i , 2 ± i are all prime.
Since 2 = ( 1 + i ) ( 1 − i ) , we see that 1 + i divides z − a if and only if it divides z + a . If we consider the issue of divisibility by 1 + i , there are three cases to consider; we could have ( 1 + i ) 2 dividing z − 1 , we could have 1 + i dividing both z − 1 and z − i , or we could have ( 1 + i ) 2 dividing z − i . Checking these three cases tells us that either z ≡ 1 ( m o d 2 ) or else z ≡ i ( m o d 2 ) .
Looking at divisibility by 2 + i and 2 − i , note that these two Gaussian integers are coprime, and each can divide one of z − 1 , z + 1 , z − i , z + i . Moreover, neither 2 + i nor 2 − i divide 2 , 2 i , or 1 ± i , and hence each of 2 + i and 2 − i can divide exactly one of these factors. There are thus 1 6 possibilities (four choices for which factor is divisible by 2 + i , and four choices for which factor is divisible by 2 − i ). For each of these 1 6 choices, the Chinese Remainder Theorem gives us a unique solution modulo 5 .
Thus, to be a solution of the original congruence, there are two values that z can take modulo 2 , and 1 6 values that z can take modulo 5 , Using the Chinese Remainder Theorem one more time, we deduce that the original equation has 2 × 1 6 = 3 2 distinct solutions modulo 1 0 .
Let z = a + b i , where a , b ∈ { 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . Then ( a + b i ) 4 = ( a 4 − 6 a 2 b 2 + b 4 ) + 4 a b ( a 2 − b 2 ) i . So we need to find all z such that a 4 − 6 a 2 b 2 + b 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 ) and 4 a b ( a 2 − b 2 ) ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 0 ) .
The second equation simplifies to a b ( a + b ) ( a − b ) ≡ 0 ( m o d 5 ) . Thus one of a , b , a + b , a − b must be a multiple of 5 .
Case 1: a = 0 or b = 0
If a = 0 then we need b 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 ) . This has 4 solutions: 1 i , 3 i , 7 i , 9 i . Similarly there are 4 solutions when b = 0 : 1 , 3 , 7 , 9 .
Case 2: a = 5 or b = 5
If a = 5 then the first equation becomes 6 2 5 − 1 5 0 b 2 + b 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 ) . Thus b 4 ≡ 6 ( m o d 1 0 ) . This has 4 solutions: 5 + 2 i , 5 + 4 i , 5 + 6 i , 5 + 8 i . Similarly there are 4 solutions when b = 5 : 2 + 5 i , 4 + 5 i , 6 + 5 i , 8 + 5 i .
Case 3: a+b = 5
a 4 − 6 a 2 b 2 + b 4 = a 4 − 6 a 2 ( 5 − a ) 2 + ( 5 − a ) 4 = − 4 a 4 + 4 0 a 3 − 5 0 0 a + 6 2 5 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 ) − 4 a 4 + 6 2 4 ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 0 ) a 4 ≡ 1 5 6 ≡ 1 ( m o d 5 ) Since a , b ≤ 5 , there are 4 solutions: 1 + 4 i , 2 + 3 i , 3 + 2 i , 4 + i .
Case 4: a + b = 10
a 4 − 6 a 2 b 2 + b 4 ≡ a 4 − 6 a 2 ( − a ) 2 + ( − a ) 4 = − 4 a 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 )
This case clearly has no solutions.
Case 5: a + b = 15
This is similar to case 3 , and has 4 solutions: 6 + 9 i , 7 + 8 i , 8 + 7 i , 9 + 6 i .
Case 5: a = b
a 4 − 6 a 2 b 2 + b 4 = − 4 a 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 )
This case has no solutions.
Case 6: a - b = 5
a 4 − 6 a 2 b 2 + b 4 = a 4 − 6 a 2 ( a + 5 ) 2 + ( a + 5 ) 4 = − 4 a 4 − 4 0 a 3 + 5 0 0 a + 6 2 5 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 0 ) a 4 ≡ 1 ( m o d 5 ) This gives us 4 solutions: 6 + i , 7 + 2 i , 8 + 3 i , 9 + 4 i .
Case 7: b - a = 5
This is similar to case 6, and has 4 solutions: 1 + 6 i , 2 + 7 i , 3 + 8 i , 4 + 9 i .
This covers all the cases and there are no repeats. Therefore the total number of solutions is 3 2 .
Detailed, brute-force solution.
This problem demonstrates how obtaining a better understanding of the fundamental mathematical idea allows us to directly approach the problem.
Wow, this is a very detailed and careful solution! Thanks! (+1)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since 1 0 = ( 2 + i ) ( 2 − i ) 2 , the ring Z [ i ] / ( 1 0 ) is isomorphic to Z [ i ] / ( 2 + i ) × Z [ i ] / ( 2 − i ) × Z [ i ] / ( 2 ) = R 1 × R 2 × R 3 = R . Now R 1 and R 2 , both being fields, contain 4 units each, while R 3 contains 2 units, the congruency classes of 1 and i , for a total of 4 × 4 × 2 = 3 2 units in R . Since the (cyclic) multiplicative groups of R 1 , R 2 , R 3 all have an order that divides 4, we have z 4 ≡ 1 for all units, so that there are 3 2 solutions.