More problems in 2016

Algebra Level 5

a 200 b 500 c 16 d 600 e 700 a^{200} \cdot b^{500} \cdot c^{16} \cdot d^{600} \cdot e^{700}

Let a , b , c , d a,b,c,d and e e be positive reals whose sum is 2016, and M M the maximum value of the expression above. Then what is the highest power of 3 that divides M ? M ?

Tip : Wait for the hardest version .


The answer is 600.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Aareyan Manzoor
Dec 28, 2015

use weighted am-gm: 200 a 200 + 500 b 500 + 16 c 16 + 600 d 600 + 700 e 700 200 + 500 + 16 + 600 + 700 ( a 200 ) 200 ( b 500 ) 500 ( c 16 ) 16 ( d 600 ) 600 ( e 700 ) 700 200 + 500 + 16 + 600 + 700 \dfrac{200\dfrac{a}{200}+500\dfrac{b}{500}+16\dfrac{c}{16}+600\dfrac{d}{600}+700\dfrac{e}{700}}{200+500+16+600+700}≥\sqrt[200+500+16+600+700]{\left(\dfrac{a}{200}\right)^{200}\left(\dfrac{b}{500}\right)^{500}\left(\dfrac{c}{16}\right)^{16}\left(\dfrac{d}{600}\right)^{600}\left(\dfrac{e}{700}\right)^{700}} the LHS is 1.raise 2016 to both sides. multiply both sides with the huge numbers. we have S 20 0 200 × 50 0 500 × 1 6 16 × 60 0 600 × 70 0 700 \mathfrak{S}≤200^{200}\times500^{500}\times16^{16}\times600^{600}\times700^{700}

Only one of these numbers is divisible by 3, that is 60 0 600 = 3 600 × 20 0 200 600^{600} = 3^{600} \times 200^{200} . The highest power of 3 that divides M M is 600 \boxed{600} .

I purposely gave the exponents whose sum is 2016

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Absolutely correct approach .(+1)

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Aareyan Manzoor , where should we discuss about the wiki then ? Lets do it on my messageboard is it okay ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

ok. sure....

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

I did same.

But I can't believe ratings.

Dev Sharma - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah I am too surprised it crossed 300 !!?? @Dev Sharma

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Did the same.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago
Matt O
Dec 28, 2015

I took the same approach with using weighted the AM/GM inequality as Aareyan except I weighted it over 50, 125, 4, 150, 175 terms for a, b, c, d, e respectively. This works because 4 is the gcd of all of the exponents in the expression of interest.

I still raised to the equation to the 2016th power but this end result is slightly easier numbers to work with because I had an additional 4 2016 4^{2016} factored out (ie M = 4 2016 5 0 200 12 5 500 4 16 15 0 600 17 5 700 M = 4^{2016} 50^{200} 125^{500} 4^{16} 150^{600} 175^{700} ).

Equality holds when a 50 = b 125 = c 4 = d 150 = e 175 = 2016 504 = 4 \frac{a}{50} = \frac{b}{125} = \frac{c}{4} = \frac{d}{150} = \frac{e}{175} = \frac{2016}{504} = 4

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...