Multifactorial and divisors

Fill in the blank.

N N has 3 3 prime factors.

N 2 N^2 has 7 ! ! 7!! positive divisors.

N 3 N^3 has 10 ! ! ! 10!!! positive divisors.

____ \text{\_\_\_\_} has 13 ! ! ! ! 13!!!! positive divisors.

Note: You might want to read up the definition of multifactorials first.

N 6 N^6 N 4 N^4 N 5 N^5 N 7 N^7

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Let N = p a q b r c N=p^aq^br^c , where p , q , r p,q,r are primes ans a , b , c a,b,c are positive integers.

Thus N 2 = p 2 a q 2 b r 2 c N^2 =p^{2a}q^{2b}r^{2c}

The no. of divisors of N 2 N^2 are ( 2 a + 1 ) × ( 2 b + 1 ) × ( 2 c + 1 ) (2a+1)\times(2b+1)\times(2c+1)

( 2 a + 1 ) × ( 2 b + 1 ) × ( 2 c + 1 ) = 7 ! ! = 7 × 5 × 3 (2a+1)\times(2b+1)\times(2c+1)=7!!=7\times5\times3

Without any loss of generality a = 1 , b = 2 , c = 3 a=1,b=2,c=3

Thus N k = p k a q k b r k c N^k =p^{ka}q^{kb}r^{kc}

Therefore no. of divisors of N k N^k are ( k a + 1 ) × ( k b + 1 ) × ( k c + 1 ) (ka+1)\times(kb+1)\times(kc+1)

( k a + 1 ) × ( k b + 1 ) × ( k c + 1 ) = 13 ! ! ! ! = 13 × 9 × 5 (ka+1)\times(kb+1)\times(kc+1)=13!!!!=13\times9\times5

k a + 1 = k ( 1 ) + 1 = 5 k = 4 ka+1=k(1)+1=5 \Rightarrow k=4

Thus ans is 4 \boxed{4}

I don't think I like multifactorials, they make the factorial symbol so confusing. You need parenthesis now to clarify, and honestly, if the whole point is to say "multiply every n numbers", it should really not be something that will take forever to write for large n. (ex. 800!!!!!!!!!! = 800 790 780...).

I couldn't figure this problem out because I wasn't sure what 10!!! or 13!!!! meant (the wiki didn't help)... I really don't like the notation at all. I hope it is changed to something more reasonable, like 64 ( ! 3 ) = 64 ! ! ! 64(!^3) = 64!!!

Alex Li - 4 years ago

Log in to reply

I agree that the notation is a bit confusing.

And we can see that n ! > n ! ! > n ! ! ! n! > n!! > n!!! then using a notation like this n ( ! 3 ) = n ! ! ! n(!^3) = n!!! will be a bit miss leading as that makes the number look much bigger than it is.

(I know that there is no reason for it to be that way but a good notation is one which is intuitive...)

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...