Multiples of 32

What is the smallest possible positive integer value of β , \beta, such that for some integers α , \alpha, γ , \gamma, δ , \delta, and ϵ \epsilon , the following condition is true?

Condition: For every five-digit number a b c d e \overline{abcde} that is a multiple of 32 , 32, α a + β b + γ c + δ d + ϵ e \alpha a + \beta b + \gamma c + \delta d + \epsilon e is also a multiple of 32. 32.

Details and assumptions

a b c \overline{abc} means 100 a + 10 b + 1 c 100a + 10b + 1c , as opposed to a × b × c a \times b \times c . As an explicit example, for a = 2 , b = 3 , c = 4 a=2, b=3, c=4 , a b c = 234 \overline{abc} = 234 and not 2 × 3 × 4 = 24 2 \times 3 \times 4 = 24 .


The answer is 8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Consider a b c d e = 20000 = 32 625 \overline{abcde} = 20000 = 32 \cdot 625 . Then 32 a α 32 \mid a \alpha \to 32 2 α 16 α 32 \mid 2 \alpha \to 16 \mid \alpha , so α \alpha must be a multiple of 16 16 , and we let α = 16 k , k Z \alpha = 16k, k\in \mathbb{Z} .

Now consider a b c d e = 12000 = 32 375 \overline{abcde} = 12000 = 32 \cdot 375 . This gives us that 32 16 k + 2 β 8 β 32 \mid 16k + 2\beta \to 8 \mid \beta . Thus, it must be the case that β 8 \beta \geq 8 , since β \beta is a positive integer.

Is β = 8 \beta = 8 possible? Yes, it is: let 32 a b c d e 32 \mid \overline{abcde} . This becomes 32 10000 a + 1000 b + 100 c + 10 d + e 32 \mid 10000a + 1000b + 100c + 10d + e \to 32 10000 a + ( 992 + 8 ) b + 100 c + 10 d + e 32 \mid 10000a + (992 + 8)b + 100c + 10d + e \to 32 10000 a + 32 31 b + 8 b + 100 c + 10 d + e 32 \mid 10000a + 32 \cdot 31b + 8 b + 100c + 10d +e \to 32 10000 a + 8 b + 100 c + 10 d + e 32 \mid 10000a + 8b + 100c + 10d + e .

Thus, setting ( α , β , γ , δ , ϵ ) = ( 10000 , 8 , 100 , 10 , 1 ) (\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta,\epsilon) = (10000,8,100,10,1) satisfies the condition, and so β = 8 \beta = \fbox{8} is the smallest positive integer value that satisfies the condition.

Moderator note:

Short and sweet approach! Good choice of 20000 and 12000.

This also gives you an easy direct way of bounding γ , δ , ϵ \gamma, \delta, \epsilon and also for generalizing the problem to 2 n 2^n .

Really nice!!

Toan Pham Quang - 7 years, 9 months ago

lol I just guessed random powers of 2 under 32 and got the right answer

Abhijeet Venkataraman - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

lol same here 2, 4, 8 XD

Bob Yang - 7 years, 9 months ago

But shouldn't we check that β \beta cannot be less than 8 8 (maybe by showing counterexamples of five digit numbers which do not satisfy the condition for some particular β < 8 \beta < 8 )?

Edit:- Never mind, I did not go through this solution thoroughly.

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I believe I did that by showing that 8 β β 8 8 \mid \beta \to \beta \geq 8 .

Sotiri Komissopoulos - 7 years, 9 months ago

A simpler example for the first half: consider 4000 4000 . Therefore 32 32 divides 4 β 4\beta , so β \beta must be at least 8 8 .

Matt McNabb - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, but I avoided using that to keep it only with respect to 5-digit integers.

Sotiri Komissopoulos - 7 years, 9 months ago

11008=32.344.Then a=1,b=1,c=0,d=0,e=8.αa+βb+γc+δd+εe=α+β+8ε. Substituting α=31,ε=4,then β=1 makes that a multiple of 32.Then shouldn't 1 be the smallest value?

Abin Das - 7 years, 9 months ago

How by setting this example, can α \alpha be generalised? I mean just by one example how can you say:

α α must be a multiple of 16

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

We need our choices of α \alpha and the other variables to satisfy the condition that α a + β b + γ c + δ d + ϵ e \alpha a + \beta b + \gamma c + \delta d + \epsilon e is a multiple of 32 for every 5-digit number that's a multiple of 32. If α \alpha is not a multiple of 16 16 , we can't express 20000 20000 in the required form. Hence, the condition will not be true (since that requires that we can do it for every 5-digit number that's a multiple of 32 - including 20000 20000 ). Thus α \alpha must be a multiple of 16 16 .

Jeremy Kong - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Got it,so you're making a claim for an example & extending it for general.

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 9 months ago
Mark Hennings
Aug 27, 2013

Let α , β , γ , δ , ε \alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta,\varepsilon be a set of integers satisfying the condition. Since 10016 10016 , 1024 1024 , 128 128 and 32 32 are all multiples of 32 32 , we must have α + δ + 6 ε β + 2 δ + 4 ε γ + 2 δ + 8 ε 3 δ + 2 ε 0 \alpha+\delta+6\varepsilon \equiv \beta+2\delta+4\varepsilon \equiv \gamma+2\delta+8\varepsilon \equiv 3\delta+2\varepsilon \equiv 0 modulo 32 32 . Solving these congruences, we deduce that α 16 ε β 8 ε γ 4 ε δ 10 ε \alpha \equiv 16\varepsilon \qquad \beta \equiv 8\varepsilon \qquad \gamma \equiv 4\varepsilon \qquad \delta \equiv 10\varepsilon modulo 32 32 . Thus β \beta must be a multiple of 8 8 , and hence the smallest possible positive value of β \beta is 8 8 .

Let's check that β = 8 \beta=8 works. Since 10000 16 10000\equiv16 , 1000 8 1000\equiv8 and 100 4 100\equiv4 modulo 32 32 , we see that a b c d e 16 a + 8 b + 4 c + 10 d + e \overline{abcde} \equiv 16a + 8b + 4c + 10d + e modulo 32 32 , and hence a b c d e \overline{abcde} is a multiple of 32 32 precisely when 16 a + 8 b + 4 c + 10 d + e 16a+8b+4c+10d+e is.

Abhishek Saraiya
Aug 29, 2013

10000 a + 1000 b + 100 c + 10 d + e = 32 k 10000a + 1000b + 100c + 10d + e = 32k , where k k is a positive integer.

32 ( 312 a + 31 b + 3 c ) + 16 a + 8 b + 4 c + 10 d + e = 32 k 32(312a + 31b + 3c) + 16a + 8b + 4c + 10d + e = 32k .

Clearly, the left side of the expression will always be a multiple of 32 32 . From the right side of the equation, we get what we are looking for: the minimal values of the coefficients in question. Thus, β = 8 \beta = 8 .

Best answer. Brilliant, really.

Terry Smith - 5 years, 11 months ago

32 a b c d e 32 ( 1 0 4 a + 1 0 3 b + 1 0 2 c + 10 d + e ) 32 | \overline{abcde} \Rightarrow 32 | (10^4a + 10^3b + 10^2c + 10d + e)

32 ( ( 1 0 4 a + 8 b + 1 0 2 c + 10 d + e ) + 32 31 b ) \Rightarrow 32 | ((10^4a + 8b + 10^2c + 10d + e) + 32*31b)

I claim 8 is the minimum possible.

Consider the example: 32 81888 32 | 81888 This rules out all possibilities of β = 1 , 2 , . . . , 7 \beta = 1,2,...,7 as the result must be 0 ( m o d 8 ) 0 \pmod{8}

Jon K
Aug 26, 2013

10000 a + 1000 b + 100 c + 10 d + e = = 16 a + 8 b + 4 c + 10 d + e ( m o d 32 ) 10000a + 1000b + 100c + 10d + e == 16a + 8b + 4c + 10d + e (mod 32)

Thus, 8 is the required value

Moderator note:

As pointed out in the comments, in order to show that something is minimal, you not only must show that it satisfies the conditions, you also must show that no smaller value satisfies the conditions.

This does not show that 8 8 is the smallest value, just that the smallest value of β \beta is no greater than 8 8 .

Mark Hennings - 7 years, 9 months ago
Tushar Gautam
Aug 26, 2013

abcde is multiple of 32

We can say 10000a+1000b+100c+10d+e=32k

32 (312a+31b+3c)+16a+8b+4c+10d+e =32k

So 16a+8b+4c+10d+e must be a multiple of 32 so comparing we get beta=8

Moderator note:

As pointed out in the comments, in order to show that something is minimal, you not only must show that it satisfies the conditions, you also must show that no smaller value satisfies the conditions.

The best and easy one

Magdi Ragheb - 7 years, 9 months ago

how can you say that beta=8 is the smallest solution?

A Former Brilliant Member - 7 years, 9 months ago

32 (312a+31b+3c)+16a+8b+4c+10d+e =32k this sentence I can't understand

Ang Li - 7 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...