What is the smallest possible positive integer value of β , such that for some integers α , γ , δ , and ϵ , the following condition is true?
Condition: For every five-digit number a b c d e that is a multiple of 3 2 , α a + β b + γ c + δ d + ϵ e is also a multiple of 3 2 .
Details and assumptions
a b c means 1 0 0 a + 1 0 b + 1 c , as opposed to a × b × c . As an explicit example, for a = 2 , b = 3 , c = 4 , a b c = 2 3 4 and not 2 × 3 × 4 = 2 4 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Short and sweet approach! Good choice of 20000 and 12000.
This also gives you an easy direct way of bounding γ , δ , ϵ and also for generalizing the problem to 2 n .
Really nice!!
lol I just guessed random powers of 2 under 32 and got the right answer
But shouldn't we check that β cannot be less than 8 (maybe by showing counterexamples of five digit numbers which do not satisfy the condition for some particular β < 8 )?
Edit:- Never mind, I did not go through this solution thoroughly.
Log in to reply
I believe I did that by showing that 8 ∣ β → β ≥ 8 .
A simpler example for the first half: consider 4 0 0 0 . Therefore 3 2 divides 4 β , so β must be at least 8 .
Log in to reply
Yes, but I avoided using that to keep it only with respect to 5-digit integers.
11008=32.344.Then a=1,b=1,c=0,d=0,e=8.αa+βb+γc+δd+εe=α+β+8ε. Substituting α=31,ε=4,then β=1 makes that a multiple of 32.Then shouldn't 1 be the smallest value?
How by setting this example, can α be generalised? I mean just by one example how can you say:
α must be a multiple of 16
Log in to reply
We need our choices of α and the other variables to satisfy the condition that α a + β b + γ c + δ d + ϵ e is a multiple of 32 for every 5-digit number that's a multiple of 32. If α is not a multiple of 1 6 , we can't express 2 0 0 0 0 in the required form. Hence, the condition will not be true (since that requires that we can do it for every 5-digit number that's a multiple of 32 - including 2 0 0 0 0 ). Thus α must be a multiple of 1 6 .
Log in to reply
Got it,so you're making a claim for an example & extending it for general.
Let α , β , γ , δ , ε be a set of integers satisfying the condition. Since 1 0 0 1 6 , 1 0 2 4 , 1 2 8 and 3 2 are all multiples of 3 2 , we must have α + δ + 6 ε ≡ β + 2 δ + 4 ε ≡ γ + 2 δ + 8 ε ≡ 3 δ + 2 ε ≡ 0 modulo 3 2 . Solving these congruences, we deduce that α ≡ 1 6 ε β ≡ 8 ε γ ≡ 4 ε δ ≡ 1 0 ε modulo 3 2 . Thus β must be a multiple of 8 , and hence the smallest possible positive value of β is 8 .
Let's check that β = 8 works. Since 1 0 0 0 0 ≡ 1 6 , 1 0 0 0 ≡ 8 and 1 0 0 ≡ 4 modulo 3 2 , we see that a b c d e ≡ 1 6 a + 8 b + 4 c + 1 0 d + e modulo 3 2 , and hence a b c d e is a multiple of 3 2 precisely when 1 6 a + 8 b + 4 c + 1 0 d + e is.
1 0 0 0 0 a + 1 0 0 0 b + 1 0 0 c + 1 0 d + e = 3 2 k , where k is a positive integer.
3 2 ( 3 1 2 a + 3 1 b + 3 c ) + 1 6 a + 8 b + 4 c + 1 0 d + e = 3 2 k .
Clearly, the left side of the expression will always be a multiple of 3 2 . From the right side of the equation, we get what we are looking for: the minimal values of the coefficients in question. Thus, β = 8 .
Best answer. Brilliant, really.
3 2 ∣ a b c d e ⇒ 3 2 ∣ ( 1 0 4 a + 1 0 3 b + 1 0 2 c + 1 0 d + e )
⇒ 3 2 ∣ ( ( 1 0 4 a + 8 b + 1 0 2 c + 1 0 d + e ) + 3 2 ∗ 3 1 b )
I claim 8 is the minimum possible.
Consider the example: 3 2 ∣ 8 1 8 8 8 This rules out all possibilities of β = 1 , 2 , . . . , 7 as the result must be 0 ( m o d 8 )
1 0 0 0 0 a + 1 0 0 0 b + 1 0 0 c + 1 0 d + e = = 1 6 a + 8 b + 4 c + 1 0 d + e ( m o d 3 2 )
Thus, 8 is the required value
As pointed out in the comments, in order to show that something is minimal, you not only must show that it satisfies the conditions, you also must show that no smaller value satisfies the conditions.
This does not show that 8 is the smallest value, just that the smallest value of β is no greater than 8 .
abcde is multiple of 32
We can say 10000a+1000b+100c+10d+e=32k
32 (312a+31b+3c)+16a+8b+4c+10d+e =32k
So 16a+8b+4c+10d+e must be a multiple of 32 so comparing we get beta=8
As pointed out in the comments, in order to show that something is minimal, you not only must show that it satisfies the conditions, you also must show that no smaller value satisfies the conditions.
The best and easy one
how can you say that beta=8 is the smallest solution?
32 (312a+31b+3c)+16a+8b+4c+10d+e =32k this sentence I can't understand
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider a b c d e = 2 0 0 0 0 = 3 2 ⋅ 6 2 5 . Then 3 2 ∣ a α → 3 2 ∣ 2 α → 1 6 ∣ α , so α must be a multiple of 1 6 , and we let α = 1 6 k , k ∈ Z .
Now consider a b c d e = 1 2 0 0 0 = 3 2 ⋅ 3 7 5 . This gives us that 3 2 ∣ 1 6 k + 2 β → 8 ∣ β . Thus, it must be the case that β ≥ 8 , since β is a positive integer.
Is β = 8 possible? Yes, it is: let 3 2 ∣ a b c d e . This becomes 3 2 ∣ 1 0 0 0 0 a + 1 0 0 0 b + 1 0 0 c + 1 0 d + e → 3 2 ∣ 1 0 0 0 0 a + ( 9 9 2 + 8 ) b + 1 0 0 c + 1 0 d + e → 3 2 ∣ 1 0 0 0 0 a + 3 2 ⋅ 3 1 b + 8 b + 1 0 0 c + 1 0 d + e → 3 2 ∣ 1 0 0 0 0 a + 8 b + 1 0 0 c + 1 0 d + e .
Thus, setting ( α , β , γ , δ , ϵ ) = ( 1 0 0 0 0 , 8 , 1 0 0 , 1 0 , 1 ) satisfies the condition, and so β = 8 is the smallest positive integer value that satisfies the condition.