Murder Mystery

Logic Level 2

One evening there was a murder in the home of married couple, their son and daughter. One of these four people murdered one of the others. One of the members of the family witnessed the crime.

The other one helped the murderer.

These are the things we know for sure:

  1. The witness and the one who helped the murderer were not of the same sex.

  2. The oldest person and the witness were not of the same sex.

  3. The youngest person and the victim were not of the same sex.

  4. The one who helped the murderer was older than the victim.

  5. The father was the oldest member of the family.

  6. The murderer was not the youngest member of the family.

Who was the murderer?

FATHER SISTER MOTHER BROTHER

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

We know from (3) that the youngest person was not the victim, from (4) that the youngest person was not the helper and from (6) that the youngest person was not the killer. The youngest person can only have been the witness therefore. If we make up a chart there are now three possible combinations:

Oldest person (father) H H M

Next to oldest (mother) V M H

Next to youngest (son) M V V

Youngest (daughter) W W W

(H = Helper ; V = Victim ; M = Murderer ; W = Witness)

We can work out from (5) that the father was the oldest, from (2) that the youngest person must have been the daughter. Therefore the next to the youngest must have been the son and the next to the oldest, the mother.

Of three possibilities: the first is impossible (from (3) – the youngest person and the victim were of different sexes); the third is also impossible (from (1) – the witness and the helper were of different sexes). Therefore only the second possibility holds – and the mother was the murderess

How can the mother be a the murderer (no such thing as a murderess)?

If she is the murderer, then from statement 1, the witness is a boy.

Then from statement 2, the oldest person is a girl.

Then from statement 5, the father is a girl. HUH?

Pi Han Goh - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Please read the first statement once again. it says that the witness and the one who helped the murderer were not of the same sex. It does not state anything about the murderer. Thank you for commenting. @Pi Han Goh

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/murderess http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/murderess http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/murderess

PJ Villarta - 5 years, 9 months ago
Saya Suka
Apr 3, 2021

1) Clue 5 ==> oldest father
2) Clue 2 ==> female witness (mother or daughter)
3) Clue 1 ==> male accomplice / helper (father or son)
4) Clue 4 ==> oldest father is alive (the victim had someone older in the family) and that the accomplice has someone younger in the family
5) Clue 3 ==> older brother male victim (or if you're creative, a younger brother male victim with an even younger stepmother?) or a female victim in the middle of age line (have a youngest son in the family)
6) Clue 6 ==> "The murderer was not the youngest member of the family"
==> mother murdered her own son, or
==> sister killed her own brother, because
==> the youngest can neither be a murderer nor the victim not even the helper, so youngest = witness and we're already told that the witness is a female, so son can't be the youngest in the family.


# Murderer Victim Witness Helper
1 (Biological / Birth) Mother Son Younger Sister Father
2 Daughter (Step)son Youngest (Step)mother Father

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...