Napoleon’s Triangle

Geometry Level 2

In the equilateral triangle A B C ABC , points D D , E E and F F are positioned on their respective edges, such that:

  • Each of the three circles pass through 3 points - 1 vertex and the remaining each on the distinct edge.
  • Their intersection point G G lies inside the equilateral triangle, but not on its boundary.

As shown on the left, it is possible for m D G F = m F G E = m E G D = 12 0 m\angle DGF = m\angle FGE = m\angle EGD = 120^{\circ} for D D , E E and F F being midpoints. Does that hold for any other point arrangement?

Bonus: Determine the probability of the point arrangement, satisfying those given conditions (if multiple arrangements exist).

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

If we assume that one arrangement is possible as shown in the left figure, then it is possible for infinitely many arrangement. This can be proved as shown below :

Taking the left figure and name various points as shown in right figure. If we rotate those dotted lines about intersection point G \,\bf G then we get another arrangement of points D , E , F D,\,E,\,F . Also D G F = F G E = E G D = 120 ° \angle DGF = \angle FGE = \angle EGD = 120\degree . Since D G F = 120 ° \angle DGF = 120\degree and D B F = 60 ° \angle DBF = 60\degree we get that quadrilateral D B F G DBFG is cyclic. Similarly other 2 2 quadrilaterals namely C F G E CFGE and A D G E ADGE are also cyclic. All these three quadrilateral have only 1 1 vertex in common namely G G . Hence all three circles will intersect at single point G G . Also if we move the intersection point G then we get different intersection point of circles.

In other words, if we take any point G G inside the triangle and make three lines G D , G E , G F GD,\,GE,\,GF in the plane of triangle such that D G F = F G E = E G D = 120 ° \angle DGF = \angle FGE = \angle EGD = 120\degree to intersect the sides at D , E , F D,\,E,\,F then construction of such circles will always be possible. Hence taking different point G G and different orientation of lines G D , G E , G F GD,\,GE,\,GF we get different points D , E , F D,\,E,\,F .

Nice argument. But proving that infinitely many arrangements exist that have the angles 120° is not the same as proving that none exist with different angles. Could you prove it for any arbitrary choice of D,E,F?

K T - 6 months ago
David Vreken
Dec 4, 2020

If A D = B F = C E AD = BF = CE , then m D G F = m F G E = m E G D = 120 ° m \angle DGF = m \angle FGE = m \angle EGD = 120° .

Proof: Let T T be the center of the equilateral triangle, and let O O be the center of the circle passing through E E , G G , F F , and C C . Also let A D = B F = C E AD = BF = CE .

By symmetry, C F T = A E G \angle CFT = \angle AEG . By the properties of a straight line, C E T = 180 ° A E G = 180 ° C F T \angle CET = 180° - \angle AEG = 180° - \angle CFT . By the angle sum property of quadrilateral C F T E CFTE , F T E + C E T + E C F + C F T = 360 ° \angle FTE + \angle CET + \angle ECF + \angle CFT = 360° , or F T E + ( 180 ° C F T ) + 60 ° + C F T = 360 ° \angle FTE + (180° - \angle CFT) + 60° + \angle CFT = 360° , which solves to F T E = 120 ° \angle FTE = 120° .

Also by symmetry, T E = T F TE = TF . That means F T E \triangle FTE is an isosceles triangle, and since F T E = 120 ° \angle FTE = 120° , its base angles are T E F = T F E = 30 ° \angle TEF = \angle TFE = 30° .

Since central E O F \angle EOF subtends the same arc as inscribed E C F \angle ECF , E O F = 2 E C F = 2 60 ° = 120 ° \angle EOF = 2 \cdot \angle ECF = 2 \cdot 60° = 120° . Since E O F \triangle EOF is an isosceles triangle, and since E O F = 120 ° \angle EOF = 120° , its base angles are O E F = O F E = 30 ° \angle OEF = \angle OFE = 30° .

Then F T E E O F \triangle FTE \cong \triangle EOF by ASA congruence, which means T E = T F = O E = O F TE = TF = OE = OF . Since T E = O E TE = OE and T E O = T E F + O E F = 30 ° + 30 ° = 60 ° \angle TEO = \angle TEF + \angle OEF = 30° + 30° = 60° , O T E \triangle OTE is an equilateral triangle, and O T = O E = O F OT = OE = OF . Therefore, T T is on circle O O .

By similar arguments, T T is on the other two circles as well. Therefore, G G and T T are the same point such that m D G F = m F G E = m E G D = 120 ° m \angle DGF = m \angle FGE = m \angle EGD = 120° .

Mark Hennings
Dec 4, 2020

Napoleon's Theorem ( le petit empereur had no part in working this out) states that if you construct equilateral triangles on the sides of any triangle D E F DEF , the centres of these triangles form an equilateral triangle (in red). If we construct the circumcircles of these triangles, then they all meet at the point G G , where D G E = E G F = F G D = 12 0 \angle DGE = \angle EGF = \angle FGD = 120^\circ . The point G G is called the first Fermat point of D E F DEF . Since (for example) E A F = 6 0 \angle EAF = 60^\circ for any point A A on the major arc E F EF , we can choose any point A A on this arc, and draw straight lines from A A through E E and F F to intersect the other circumcircles at C C and B B respectively. Then A B C ABC is an equilateral triangle with the desired properties. This works provided that all of the angles in D E F DEF are less than 12 0 120^\circ , which means that G G lies inside the triangle D E F DEF .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...