With the following flawed work out I strived to prove that
x → 0 lim x x = ∞
Which of the following step is made firstly incorrect?
Let a function f ( x ) = x x , where x > 0 .
Step :
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It is not clear to me how L'hopital is involved.
Instead, the error is because of (to be filled in).
If we differentiate the denominator as you mentioned which carries constant 1 results to ∞ so better is to mentioned that we need to get that form so that L-hopital rule is involved as e lim x → 0 ( 1 / x l o g x .
Log in to reply
Ah ic. Could you make that usage of L-hopital's rule much clearer?
Otherwise, it seems to me that you're saying lim f ( x ) = lim f ′ ( x ) , where f ( x ) = x lo g x (and that's the error that I thought was happening).
e lim x → 0 + − x − 2 x − 1
e l i m x → 0 + ( − x )
e 0 = 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If we apply L'Hospital, we need to differentiate the denominator as well!
So Step 6 is wrong!
lim x → 0 + ( x lo g x ) = lim x → 0 + 1 / x lo g x = lim x → 0 + d x d x 1 d x d lo g x
This is how we will apply L'Hospital