This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I did it with a slightly different method.Here it is: 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 ⋯ = 3 The above stated nested radical is a very famous nested radical first stated be Ramanujan.And it is equal to 3 .Now we can see that the question is embedded in this radical so to get the question from this radical,we do this: 3 = 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 ⋯ 3 2 = 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 ⋯ 2 9 − 1 = 1 + 3 1 + 4 ⋯ Lo and behold,we have got the value of the question! Simply solving the R.H.S we get: 2 9 − 1 = 2 8 = 4
Log in to reply
how did you figure that mess = 3 ?
Log in to reply
Go through http://zariski.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/sr_nroots.pdf
mess, huh? It is the one of the finest and beautiful results in Mathematics.
Its the ramanujan general formula, but as u can see the first radical is 1+2 and not 1+3l, as we have it in this instance, any way both solutions are correct.
It is a very famous nested radical stated by Ramanujan which equals 3 .Go through Ramanujan,s wikipedia page.You,ll find it
Nice! Also, for the very first equation I used, we can simplify these cases to get:
a + b a + ( b + 1 ) a + . . . = a + b
Now, I don't know how it works in other cases, and this is pretty specific, but if you see radicals like this one, you could just use the above equation.
Log in to reply
It would be a + b but here as a=1 you find no change
I know but this is the first thing that popped in my mind.
Hey .... I did the same as I also knew that.
Log in to reply
Now that I think of it,this is more of a shortcut than a solution :-p
I like your proof very much. A small typo towards the end, solving the L.H.S we get:
n can't be -1?
x²=1+x²-1.......(i)
x²=1+(x+1)(x-1)
Now Further,
x+1=√(x+1)²
x+1=√1+(x+2)(x) (using (i) )
Again
x+2=√1+(x+3)(x+1)
Finally
x²=1+(x-1)√1+(x) √1+(x+3)(x+1)... and so on
x=√1+(x-1)√1+(x) √1+(x+1)(x+3)...
Now according to the given equation put x=4 :
4=√1+(4-1)√1+(4) √1+(4+1)...
4=√1+3√1+4 √1+5...
Solution edited to avoid inappropriate comments on a public forum
[x+n]^2 = n^2 + 2nx + x^2 = n^2 + x [(x+n) + n] [x+n] = sqrt(n^2 + x [(x+n)+n]) replace x+n with its definition. x+n = sqrt(n^2 + x sqrt(n^2 + (x+n)[(x+2n)+n])) x+n = sqrt(n^2 + x sqrt(n^2 + (x+n) sqrt(n^2 + (x+2n) sqrt(...)...) set n = 1, x = 3 to get 3+1 = 4 = sqrt(1+3sqrt(1+(4sqrt(1+(5sqrt())))
so the answer is 4
R a m a n u j a n i d e n t i t y 3 = 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 1 + 5 1 + 6 1 + … S q u a r i n g b o t h s i d e s 9 = 1 + 2 1 + 3 1 + 4 1 + 5 1 + 6 1 + … ∴ 4 = 1 + 3 1 + 4 1 + 5 1 + 6 1 + …
One key to answer this question is to know the "great" Ramanujan identity. Beautiful identity indeed.
The crux move to this problem is that, n^2=1+(n-1)(n+1) So, n=sqrt(1+(n-1)(n+1)) Then you can do the same thing with (n+1)
function rr(n){
var last=n Math.sqrt(2+n); while (n>3){ last=(n-1) Math.sqrt(1+last); n--;
} return Math.sqrt(1+last); }
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
In problems like these, f ( x ) = x + n + a .
Also, f ( x ) = a x + ( n + a ) 2 + x a x + ( n + a ) 2 + ( x + n ) a x + . . . , and it is fairly obvious that a=0, n=1, and x=3.
So just add those to get 4, which is the answer.
Thanks Ramanujan!