⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ a b c = 2 a 2 b 3 c 4 = 5 a − 1 b 7 c − 2 = 9
If a , b , and c are real numbers, determine ( a + b + c ) , to two decimal places.
Hint: Can you find a clever way of representing this as a linear system?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
That's exactly what I had in mind. Although on second look, I think we could directly apply a multiplicative form of Gaussian elimination as well.
Log in to reply
Yes, your approach skips the linearization step, but it was more fun to take the cue from your hint. :)
I originally solved it by linearizing using natural logarithms (see Brian C's solution). But we can also directly apply Gaussian elimination in a multiplicative way. Equations are repeated and numbered below.
⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ a b c = 2 ( E q 1 ) a 2 b 3 c 4 = 5 ( E q 2 ) a − 1 b 7 c − 2 = 9 ( E q 3 )
( E q 3 ) 2 multiplied by ( E q 2 ) yields b = ( 8 1 ∗ 5 ) 1 7 1 ≈ 1 . 4 2 3 5 7
( E q 3 ) multiplied by ( E q 1 ) yields b 8 c − 1 = 1 8 . Therefore, c = 1 8 ( 8 1 ∗ 5 ) 1 7 8 ≈ 0 . 9 3 7 0 6
Plugging b and c into ( E q 1 ) , a is easily found to be ( 8 1 ∗ 5 ) 1 7 9 3 6 ≈ 1 . 4 9 9 2 9
{ a b c = 2 . . . ( 1 ) a 2 b 3 c 4 = 5 . . . ( 2 )
Rearranging ( 2 ) .
⟹ ( a b c ) 2 × b c 2 = 5
This gives:
⟹ b = 4 c 2 5 and c = 4 b 5 . . . ( 3 )
Putting b in ( 1 ) .
⟹ a × 4 c 2 5 × c = 2
This gives:
⟹ c = 8 5 a
Putting c in b .
⟹ b = 4 × 4 2 5 a 2 5 = 5 a 2 1 6
This gives:
⟹ a = 5 b 1 6 . . . ( 4 )
Now, putting a and c in ( 1 ) .
⟹ 5 b 1 6 × b × 4 b 5 = 2
This gives:
⟹ b = 1
Putting b in ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) .
⟹ c = 4 5
⟹ a = 5 1 6
Now,
⟹ a + b + c = 5 1 6 + 1 + 4 5 ≈ 3 . 8 6
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Note first that a , b , c must all be positive, since as a b c is positive, either all three variables are positive or precisely two are negative, in which cases
if a , b were negative and c positive then a 2 b 3 c 4 would be negative,
if a , c were negative and b positive then a − 1 b 7 c − 2 would be negative, and
if b , c were negative and a positive then a 2 b 3 c 4 would be negative.
So, as a , b , c > 0 we can let x = ln ( a ) , y = ln ( b ) and z = ln ( c ) , transforming the system to
(i) x + y + z = ln ( 2 ) , (ii) 2 x + 3 y + 4 z = ln ( 5 ) and (iii) − x + 7 y − 2 z = ln ( 9 ) .
Then (ii) + 2*(iii) yields 1 7 y = ln ( 5 ) + 2 ln ( 9 ) = ln ( 4 0 5 ) ⟹ y = 1 7 ln ( 4 0 5 ) .
Next, (i) + (iii) gives us that 8 y − z = ln ( 2 ) + ln ( 9 ) = ln ( 1 8 ) ⟹ z = 8 y − ln ( 1 8 ) = 1 7 8 ln ( 4 0 5 ) − ln ( 1 8 ) .
Finally, using equation (i) we find that x = ln ( 2 ) − 1 7 ln ( 4 0 5 ) − 1 7 8 ln ( 4 0 5 ) + ln ( 1 8 ) = ln ( 3 6 ) − 1 7 9 ln ( 4 0 5 ) .
Thus a + b + c = e x + e y + e z ≈ 1 . 4 2 3 6 + 0 . 9 3 7 1 + 1 . 4 9 9 3 = 3 . 8 6 to 2 decimal places.
(Note that a b c ≈ 2 . 0 0 0 as expected.)