If the solution of the differential equation
d x 3 d 3 y + 2 d x 2 d 2 y + d x d y = e 2 x + x 2 + x is
y = c 1 + ( c 2 + c 3 x ) e A x + C B e D x + F E x G + H x I − K J x L
where c 1 , c 2 , c 3 are constants.
A , B , C , D , E , F , G , H , I , J , K , L are integers and all the fractions are co prime.
Find A + B + C + D + E + F + G + H + I + J + K + L
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
For the original problem, we could also integrate both sides to obtain a linear second order differential equation and solve for the complementary function and particular integrals.
\L ( u ) denotes Laplace transform of u . Why isn't it turning to LATEX?
Log in to reply
I think there's no such input in Latex. Try out L ( u ) .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Ah! A really easy problem in disguise.
y ′ ′ ′ + 2 y ′ ′ + y ′ = e 2 x + x 2 + x
Now, using Laplace transform,
s 3 \L ( y ) − s 2 y ( 0 ) − s y ′ ( 0 ) − y ′ ′ ( 0 ) + 2 s 2 \L ( y ) − 2 s y ( 0 ) − 2 y ′ ( 0 ) + s \L ( y ) − y ( 0 ) = s − 2 1 + s 3 2 + s 2 1
Or,
\L ( y ) = s 3 + 2 s 2 + s s − 2 1 + s 3 2 + s 2 1 + ( s 2 + 2 s + 1 ) y ( 0 ) + ( s + 2 ) y ′ ( 0 ) + y ′ ′ ( 0 )
Now the inverse transform, I believe can be done by hand quite easily but for now, I just check out for it in W|A and give the result. (However, you can easily work it out for yourself. Just manipulate it in "good" partial fractions so that they reach the defined inverse transform results given in the Table. Check out there and you will get the result. Try it out!)
The result -
y = c 1 + ( c 2 + c 3 x ) e − x + 1 8 e 2 x + 3 x 3 + 4 x − 2 3 x 2