Not only Arithmetic, But also Geometric

Algebra Level 2

a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots \ldots \ldots The above progression of real numbers is both Arithmetic and Geometric.

One can easily see─ so is possible whenever all terms are equal, that is, 0 a 1 = a 2 = a 3 = 0 \neq a_1=a_2=a_3= \ldots \ldots \ldots , leaving 0 0 as common difference for Arithmetic Nature, and 1 1 as common ratio for Geometric Nature.

But is so possible without all terms being equal?

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

  • Let a , b a, b and c c be any three consecutive terms of the progression.

  • As the progression is arithmetic, c + a = 2 b c+a=2b .

  • As the progression is geometric, c a = b 2 ca=b^2 .

  • Now, ( c a ) 2 = ( c + a ) 2 4 c a = ( 2 b ) 2 4 b 2 = 4 b 2 4 b 2 = 0 c a = 0 c = a a = b = c (c-a)^2 = (c+a)^2-4ca=(2b)^2-4b^2=4b^2-4b^2=0 \implies c-a=0 \implies c=a \implies \boxed{a=b=c} .

So, the answer is No \boxed{\text{No}} .

Can't there be only two different terms in GP/AP. Like for eg. can 2 , 3 2,3 be a AP and a GP? As there is no third term to check for whether the difference is 'constant' or ratio is 'common'! This is same as saying p q p\implies q is true whenever p p is false ie you have not enough terms to check for whether condition of AP/GP is satisfied or not?

Rishabh Jain - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

That's why I meant an infinite progression.

Muhammad Rasel Parvej - 3 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...