Not The Smallest

Algebra Level 3

x + 5 , 2 x + 2 , 3 x + 2 x + 5,\quad -2x + 2,\quad 3x + 2 For the above 3 expressions, which is never the smallest for any real number x x ?

x + 5 x+5 2 x + 2 -2x + 2 3 x + 2 3x + 2 There is some value of x x which makes an expression the smallest

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Zee Ell
Dec 29, 2016

Let's compare the expressions pairwise (we do not allow equality here, because this would mean, that at least two of the expressions are equal, therefore there wouldn't be a smallest one).

a) 2 x + 2 < x + 5 3 < 3 x 1 < x \text {a) } -2x + 2 < x + 5 \iff -3 < 3x \iff -1 < x

b) 2 x + 2 < 3 x + 2 0 < 5 x 0 < x \text {b) } -2x + 2 < 3x + 2 \iff 0 < 5x \iff 0 < x

c) a b c d e x + 5 < 3 x + 2 3 < 2 x 1.5 < x \text {c) } \hphantom { abcde } x + 5 < 3x + 2 \iff 3 < 2x \iff 1.5 < x

Now, we can use these results to investigate the following cases:

Case 1: x < 1 a b c d e f g We get: a b c d e 3 x + 2 < x + 5 < 2 x + 2 \textbf {Case 1: } \, \mathbf {x < -1} \hphantom {abcdefg} \text {We get: } \hphantom {abcde} 3x + 2 < x + 5 < - 2x + 2

Case 2: 1 < x < 0 a b c We get: a b c d e 3 x + 2 < 2 x + 2 < x + 5 \textbf {Case 2: } \, \mathbf {-1 < x < 0} \hphantom {abc} \text {We get: } \hphantom {abcde} 3x + 2 < -2x + 2 < x + 5

Case 3: 0 < x < 1.5 a b c i We get: a b c 2 x + 2 < 3 x + 2 < x + 5 \textbf {Case 3: } \, \mathbf {0 < x < 1.5} \hphantom {abci} \text {We get: } \hphantom {abc} -2x + 2 < 3x + 2 < x + 5

Case 4: 1.5 < x a b c d e f g i We get: a b c 2 x + 2 < x + 5 < 3 x + 2 \textbf {Case 4: } \, \mathbf {1.5 < x } \hphantom {abcdefgi} \text {We get: } \hphantom {abc} -2x + 2 < x + 5 < 3x + 2

As we can see from these cases, whenever we have a smallest one amongst these three expressions, it cannot be:

x + 5 \boxed { x + 5 }

Lohith Tummala
Jan 7, 2017

Since these expressions seem easy to graph, we think of it like this: Since y=-2x+2 is the only negative one, at when x approaches infinity, it becomes the lowest. Since y=3x+2 is the steepest positive function, when x approaches negative infinity, it becomes the lowest. At x=0, the two above functions intersect with y=x+5 above them. Therefore, it is above at least one of the functions at all times. Therefore, x+5 never is the lowest.

Taking x = 100 x = 100 and x = 100 x = -100 shows that 2 x + 2 -2x+2 and 3 x + 2 3x + 2 can be the smallest number.

Now, we try to figure out the conditions for x + 5 x + 5 to be the smallest : x + 5 3 x + 2 x 1.5 x + 5 2 x + 2 x 1 x + 5 \leq 3x + 2 \implies x \geq 1.5 \\ x + 5 \leq -2x+2 \implies x \leq -1

Hence, we see that x + 5 x+5 can never be the smallest number.

2017!!!!!!

Razzi Masroor - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Sorry. What did you mean?

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago
Mainak Chaudhuri
Feb 17, 2018

We can also say this by the analogy that a negative value of x will make the third expressions more negative and a positive value can make them first expression more negative i.e. smaller . But any real value of x will directly influence the second expression. However a lot of thanks to Calvin sir , this is a GREAT Question...:):)

That's essentially the idea. However, there are still some details you would have to check.

Calvin Lin Staff - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

ok sir, thanx for the guidelines

MAINAK CHAUDHURI - 3 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...