Let N be a multiple of 2013.
Which of 2014 and 2015 can be the last four digits of N ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We have to find out if there's a number x ≡ 0 m o d 2 0 1 3 , x ≡ { 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 5 } m o d 1 0 4 .
Since 2013 and 10000 are coprime, we know that such a number always exists from the Chinese Remainder Theorem.
Fun question: Can you tell me all the numbers which when multiplied to 2 0 1 3 end in 2 0 1 4 / 2 0 1 5 ? An elementary approach solves the posed as well as the above problem. Go back to childhood riddles!
2 0 1 3
x y z ×
_2014____
(... x , y , z are digits) You know that z can only be 8 , because only then the last digit of product will be 4 . There is no other option for z .
2 0 1 3
x y 8 ×
=====
1 6 1 0 4
? ? ? ? ×
_2014____
Now among the question marks, the last one must be 1 , so the multiplication of digit y with 2 0 1 3 ends in 1 , so y is 7 .
2 0 1 3
x 7 8 ×
=====
_ 1 6 1 0 4
1 4 0 9 1 ×
? ? ? ? × ×
_ _2014__
Obviously, the last question mark now should be 0 . So x is 0 .
_ 2 0 1 3
w 0 7 8 ×
=====
_ 1 6 1 0 4
1 4 0 9 1 ×
0 0 0 0 × ×
? ? ? × × ×
_ _2014__
The last question marked digit should now be 5 . Because, in that column: 6 and the carry over of 1 from the right column has already made up a 7 . So the digit 5 can only make up the 2 required in the product. So, digit w multiplied by 2 0 1 3 ends in 5 . Thus, digit w is 5 . There is no ambiguity.
_ 2 0 1 3
5 0 7 8 ×
=====
_''''" 1 6 1 0 4
_ '' 1 4 0 9 1 ×
_ '' 0 0 0 0 × ×
1 0 0 6 5 × × ×
_ _2014__
So, the last digits, WITHOUT ambiguity are known to be 2 0 1 4 if and only if the number to be multiplied ends in . . . 5 0 7 8 . Thus the complete set of numbers can be represented as:
n × 1 0 0 0 + 5 0 7 8
Of course, the question of possibility is solved easily. Yes, it is possible for a multiple of 2 0 1 3 to end in 2 0 1 4 . (precisely, ? ? ? ? . . . ? ? 5 0 7 8 multiples actually)
A similiar analysis for 2 0 1 5 yields a 'yes' for ? ? ? ? . . . ? ? 0 1 5 5 multiples.
Interestingly, the procedure makes it clear:
It is possible for numbers ending in any segment of digits to come up as multiples of any odd number for which member of a unique family represented by: n × 1 0 p + x , must be multiplied ; here p is the segment length (number of digits) and segment x has p digits.
The old fashioned way works fine too but it's very impractical once the numbers become much larger.
The complete set of numbers (for 2014) will be written as: n*10000 + 5078 :) See to it ;)
As 2013 x 5077 = 10220001, any ABCD can be the last four digits as a multiple when multiplied by 5077 x ABCD, including 2014 and 2015.
This solution is incomplete. You did not show how you determine that 5 0 7 7 is a number to be multiplied by 2 0 1 3 to get the last four digits as 0 0 0 1 .
2014 and 2015. According to Dirichlet theory, in sequence: 2014,20142014,......., 20142014....2014 ( 2014 times of 2014), there are 2 numbers which are 20142014..2014 (m times) and 20142014...2014( n times) and the subtraction of them is multiple of 2013 ===> 20142014...2014 (m times) - 20142014...2014 (n times) multiple for 2013 ===> 20142014...2014 (m -n times) is multiple of 2013
OR
5078 2013=10222014, 155 2013=312015, So both 2014 and 2015
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As g c d ( 2 0 1 3 , 1 0 0 0 0 ) = 1 , we see, there are n , m ∈ Z such that,
2 0 1 3 n + 1 0 0 0 0 m = 1
Thus, ( 2 0 1 3 ) ( 2 0 1 4 n ) − 2 0 1 4 = − 2 0 1 4 ( 1 0 0 0 0 m )
This implies that, ( 2 0 1 3 ) ( 2 0 1 4 n ) ≡ 2 0 1 4 ( m o d 1 0 0 0 0 ) .
If n < 0 , substitute ( 2 0 1 3 ) ( 2 0 1 4 n ) with a positive ( 2 0 1 3 ) ( 2 0 1 4 n + 1 0 0 0 0 k ) , where k is an arbitrary integer.
Similarly, we can demonstrate the proof of the last four digits being 2 0 1 5 . □