What is the greatest natural number such that is rational?
The difficulty here is not in the answer, but in the justification.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We should immediately feel that the answer should be 1 ; s q r t 2 is irrational and there seems to be no obvious natural n such that n 2 is rational.
We wish to prove that n = 1 is the greatest natural number such that n 2 is rational. We will do this by proving an equivalent statement- that n 2 is irrational for all n ≥ 2 .
Firstly, recall that 2 is irrational. The proof is elementary, so I won't repeat it, though a selection of proofs can be found here .
So, we now only need to show that n 2 is irrational for all n ≥ 3 . Take n ≥ 3 and suppose that n 2 is rational. Then, there exist p , q ∈ Z , with nonzero q , such that n 2 = q p . Now, raising both sides to the power of n preserves equality: ( q p ) n = 2 i.e. p n = 2 q n . Note that if q is nonzero then so is p .
So, for n ≥ 3 , there exist p , q ∈ Z , with nonzero p , q , such that p n = q n + q n
This contradicts Fermat's Last Theorem , which asserts that no n ≥ 3 satisfy p n = q n + q n for nonzero p , q ∈ Z .
■