Number Grid Puzzle

Solve this mathematics cross number grid puzzle by placing non-zero digits in each cell.

Across
1. Prime
2. Perfect Square

Down
1. Perfect Square
2. Two times 1 Across

What is the sum of all 4 digits?


The answer is 20.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Chung Kevin
Nov 21, 2016

Because both 2 across and 1 down are perfect squares, by looking at the last digit of the 2-digit perfect squares, we know that these numbers are either { 81 , 16 } , { 16 , 64 } , { 36 , 64 } \{ 81, 16 \} , \{ 16, 64 \}, \{ 36, 64 \} .

Case 1: 1 down is 81, 2 across is 16. Let the unknown cell (top right corner) be a a .
Because 2 down is "twice of 1 across", we get that 2 × ( 80 + a ) = 10 a + 6 2 \times (80 + a) = 10a + 6 . This gives us a = 77 4 a = \frac{77}{4} which isn't a valid digit.

Case 2: 1 down is 16, 2 across is 64. Let the unknown cell (top right corner) be a a .
Because 2 down is "twice of 1 across", we get that 2 × ( 10 + a ) = 10 a + 4 2 \times (10 + a) = 10a + 4 . This gives us a = 2 a = 2 , but 12 12 is not a prime number.

Case 3: 1 down is 36, 2 across is 64. Let the unknown cell (top right corner) be a a .
Because 2 down is "twice of 1 across", we get that 2 × ( 30 + a ) = 10 a + 4 2 \times (30 + a) = 10a + 4 . This gives us a = 7 a = 7 , and 74 74 is not a prime number.

Hence, only case 3 is valid. Thus, the sum of digits is 3 + 7 + 6 + 4 = 20 3 + 7 + 6 + 4 = 20 .

There is a typo in the first line. It should say, "Because 2 across and 1 down..."

Also, 81 and 16 would satisfy those two clues as well.

Geoff Pilling - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

I missed that. I have added that case in.

Chung Kevin - 4 years, 6 months ago

Did it another way! I looked at 2-digit primes and their double, and realized that {37,74} is the only pair that suffices the same digit necessity. The other number is pretty easy to find.

William Nathanael Supriadi - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Oooh! I didn't realize that! That's quite easy to test too.

Can you add that solution?

Chung Kevin - 4 years, 6 months ago
Arjen Vreugdenhil
Nov 30, 2016

This problem can still be solved if we replace 1 across by "odd" instead of "prime"; and if we know nothing about 1 down.

Let the digits be a b c d \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array} Then

  • Since a b \overline{ab} is odd, b b is odd.

  • b d = 2 a b \overline{bd} = 2\overline{ab} . With b b odd, this implies b 5 b \geq 5 , b = 2 a + 1 b = 2a+1 , and therefore 2 a < 5 2 \leq a < 5 .

  • Since d = 2 ( b 5 d = 2(b-5 ) and b b is odd, d d is a multiple of four.

  • With c d \overline{cd} a square, and d d a multiple of four, we must have d = 4 d = 4 and c = 6 c = 6 .

  • Because d = 2 ( b 5 ) = 4 d = 2(b-5) = 4 , we have b = 7 b = 7 ; and from b = 2 a + 1 = 7 b = 2a+1 = 7 , it follows a = 3 a = 3 .

The answer is a + b + c + d = 3 + 7 + 6 + 4 = 20 a + b + c + d = 3 + 7 + 6 + 4 = \boxed{20} .

Oh wow! I didn't expect that twist!

To create the problem, I actually wrote them down first before deciding how to describe them. I then wrote up the solution to ensure that the answer was uniquely determined. I had a mistake in my solution which Geoff thankfully pointed out.

Chung Kevin - 4 years, 6 months ago
Michael Mendrin
Dec 1, 2016

There are only six 2-digit perfect squares, 16 , 25 , 36 , 49 , 64 , 81 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81 . A quick glance at them shows that the only [reasonable--see reply below] one here which 2nd digit can be the 1st digit of another is 36 36 . Once we have that, the rest follows almost immediately.

There are actually 3 possible cases - ( 36 , 64 ) , ( 16 , 64 ) , ( 81 , 16 ) (36, 64), (16, 64), (81,16) .

I missed the third case and Geoff pointed it out.

Chung Kevin - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

True enough, but the first row can't be over 47. I missed the 16 , 64 16, 64 .

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...