True or False?
If a and b are irrational numbers , then a b is always an irrational number.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Brother , use Latex.
I am typing you the code, Edit it like this Just erase all the text and just copy paste .
Is that true that Irrational raised to irrational is irrational, Which is ( I r r a t i o n a l ) I r r a t i o n a l = Irrational
Type in 1 for True and 2 for False
Log in to reply
I cleaned up the Latex in Naren's solution. Hope it looks o.k. to you now.
Another counterexample is e ln ( 2 ) = 2 .
Note that 2 2 is known as the Gelfond-Schneider constant , which is not only irrational but transcendental as well by Gelfond's Theorem .
Both log(4) and √10 are irrational. However
√10 ^log(4) = 10^log(2) = 2.
If you let a = − 2 and b = 2 . Using De Moivre's formula, a b is gonna be a complex number
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The answer is F a l s e .
We have b = 2 as an irrational number, and a = 2 2 is also irrational.
But a b = ( 2 2 ) 2 = 2 2 × 2 = 2 2 = 2 ,
which is rational.