F = A B 2 + 2 × A × B + B A 2 A , B are non-zero digits, but not necessarily distinct . Can F be a multiple of 1 0 1 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Unless either A or B equals 0 . For example, 1 0 2 + 2 × 1 × 0 + 0 1 2 = 1 0 1 .
Log in to reply
True, except we're told 1 ≤ A , B ≤ 9 . (You're right, though, I should have mentioned that explicitly in my solution - edited now.)
Log in to reply
However, in my solution, A = 1 , and B = 0 , satisfying 1 ≤ A , B ≤ 9 .
Actually, the meaning of the inequality is that both A and B lies in the range [1,9]
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Rewriting the expression, we have F = ( 1 0 A + B ) 2 + 2 A B + ( 1 0 B + A ) 2 . Expanding and collecting terms, this becomes F = 1 0 1 A 2 + 4 2 A B + 1 0 1 B 2 . The only way this can be a multiple of 1 0 1 is if 2 A B is a multiple of 1 0 1 . But since 1 0 1 is a prime, and since (per the problem) 1 ≤ A , B ≤ 9 , this is clearly impossible.
So F is never a multiple of 1 0 1 .