Open your mind before you answer it

Calculus Level 4

Suppose f : [ 0 , 1 ] [ 0 , 1 ] f:[0,1]\rightarrow[0,1] is a continuous non-decreasing function with f ( 0 ) = 0 f(0)=0 and f ( 1 ) = 1 f(1)=1 . Define g ( y ) = min { x [ 0 , 1 ] f ( x ) y } g(y) = \min \{ x \in [0,1] | f(x) \geq y \} , then:

A: g g is non-decreasing. B: If g g is continuous then f f is strictly increasing. both A and B neither A nor B

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Prasun Biswas
Jun 25, 2014

Since it is already said that f f is continuous and non-decreasing, so it is increasing (whether g g is continuous or not).

According to given def. of g g , the value of g ( a ) g(a) is the min value of the set { x [ 0 , 1 ] f ( x ) a } \{x\in [0,1]| f(x)\geq a\} which will increase with increase in a a . That is, g ( a ) g(a) will increase if a a increases.

So, g is non-decreasing

P.S. -- I haven't actually studied this part in Calculus till now, so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong... :)

[I realize that this solution is quite messed up, I'll edit it shortly. You might want to check Dan Lawson's comment below (message added on 04-11-2015)]

I have two concerns with this solution:

  1. I don't think non-decreasing and continuous implies strictly increasing. For example, if f ( x ) f(x) is defined to be 2 x 2x for 0 x 1 2 0 \leq x \leq \frac{1}{2} and 1 1 for 1 2 x 1 \frac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 1 , then f f is both continuous and non-decreasing but is not strictly increasing.
  2. Even if the function f f was strictly increasing by the conditions of the problem, then B would be vacuously true, not false.

It is the case that B is false, however. Using the example above, g g is continuous from [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] to [ 0 , 1 2 ] [0, \frac{1}{2}] but f f is not strictly increasing.

Dan Lawson - 6 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

That's a nice solution.

Pranav Rao - 5 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...