Optimise the N body decay!

A stationary particle of rest mass M M decays into N N particles of rest masses m 1 , m 2 , . . . , m N m_1 , m_2 , ... , m_{N} , such that

m 1 = M 4 , m 2 = M 8 , , m N = M 2 N + 1 . m_{1} = \frac{M}{4},\quad m_{2} = \frac{M}{8},\quad \ldots, \quad m_{N} = \frac{M}{2^{N+1}}.

As N N \rightarrow \infty , find the maximum possible total energy E 1 E_{1} of the particle with mass m 1 m_1 in the rest frame of the mother particle.

Give your anwser as γ \gamma , where γ = E 1 m 1 c 2 \gamma = \frac{E_{1}}{m_1 c^2} , often called the Lorentz factor.


Bonus question: What configuration of energies and momenta of the other N 1 N -1 particles does this maximum energy correspond to? Can you generalize this?


The answer is 2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

For this problem, it is tempting to try and make up from scratch a configuration that will maximise the total energy of m 1 m_1 . However, it is not trivial to prove that this is in fact the optimal solution. A simple approach I found (most probably not original at all) makes it obvious what configuration that is and quickly gives the maximum energy. Throughout this solution I will assume c = 1 c = 1 . I use . \left \| . \right \| to denote the length of a four-vector and . \left | . \right | to denote the length of a spatial vector.

For timelike four-vectors in Minkowski space with sign convention (+, -, -, -), the inverse of the triangle inequality holds:

x + y x + y \left \| x \right \| + \left \| y \right \|\leq \left \| x + y \right \|

Using this it's not hard to show that for any set of vectors in Minkowski space { x i } \left \{ x_i \right \} we have:

i = 2 N x i i = 2 N x i \sum\limits_{i=2}^{N} \left \| x_i \right \| \leq \left \| \sum\limits_{i=2}^{N} x_i \right \|

Let this set be the four-momenta of particles 2 , 3 , . . . , N 2, 3, ... ,N .

By conservation of four-momentum, we have:

i = 2 N p i = P p 1 \sum\limits_{i=2}^{N} p_i = P - p_1 where P = ( M , 0 , 0 , 0 ) P = \left ( M,0,0,0 \right) is the four-momentum of the mother particle.

Plugging this into our inequality, and using the fact that p i = m i \left \| p_i \right \| = m_i , we get:

i = 2 N m i = i = 2 N p i P p 1 = ( M E 1 ) 2 p 1 2 = M 2 2 M E 1 + E 1 2 p 1 2 = M 2 + m 1 2 2 M E 1 \sum\limits_{i=2}^{N} m_i =\sum\limits_{i=2}^{N} \left \| p_i \right \| \leq \left \| P-p_1 \right \| = \sqrt{\left(M-E_1\right)^2 - \left|\vec{p_1}\right|^2} = \sqrt{M^2 - 2ME_1 + E_1^2 - \left|\vec{p_1}\right|^2} = \sqrt{M^2+m_1^2-2ME_1}

Manipulating the terms, we obtain:

E 1 M 2 + m 1 2 ( i = 2 N m i ) 2 2 M = M 2 = 2 m 1 E_1 \leq \frac{M^2 + m_{1}^2 - \left( \sum\limits_{i=2}^{N} m_i \right )^2}{2M} = \frac{M}{2} = 2m_1

Putting back the c c where it needs to be, we get:

γ = E 1 m 1 c 2 2 \gamma = \frac{E_1}{m_{1}c^2} \leq 2 .

Using the properties of the triangle inequality, we can conclude that equality occurs when all four-vectors after the decay are scalar multiples of each other. This means that all spatial momenta are along one direction, and for particles 2 , . . . , i , . . . , j , . . . , N 2, ..., i , ... , j, ..., N we have:

β i = p i E i = p j E j = β j \beta_i = \frac{\left|\vec{p_i}\right|}{Ei} = \frac{\left|\vec{p_j}\right|}{Ej} = \beta_j .

This means that the velocities of all other particles are equal.

Xinghong Fu
Sep 3, 2019

To maximise the energy of particle m 1 m_1 , consider the rest of the particles as one composite particle with no relative motion such that the energy of all the particles is minimised. Since i = 2 m i = M 4 = m 1 \sum_{i=2}^{\infty} {m_i} = \frac{M}{4} = m_1 , the decay is symmetric. Therefore E 1 = 1 2 M c 2 E_1 = \frac{1}{2}M c^2 . The general case for m i m_i can be solved using an identical approach.

However, it is not obvious (although intuitive) that no relative motion minimises the energy of the rest of the particles in the relativistic case. I would be happy to see a simple argument I may be missing for this. The idea for this problem arised when I was trying to prove this fact rigorously. A solution without justification of that is not complete.

Radosław Grabarczyk - 1 year, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...