Find the number of ordered quadruples of complex numbers ( a , b , c , d ) such that ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ a b = b − c b c = c − d c d = d − a a d = a − b .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nicely done!
Nice solution!
Adding all the equations, we get ( a + c ) ( b + d ) = 0 ⟹ a = − c , or b = − d Taking a = − c , the first equation becomes a b = a + b and the second equation becomes a b = a + d . Hence b = d . Using this in third equation, we get a b = a − b . Hence b = 0 . Hence d = 0 . Using this in third equation, a = 0 . Thus c is also equal to 0 . Similarly, taking b = − d will give same results.
Adding the first two equations together gives b ( a + c ) = b − d Doing this for the other 3 variables gives also: a ( b + d ) = a − c c ( b + d ) = c − a d ( a + c ) = d − b
From equations 2 and 3 we get a = − c , and from 1 and 4 we get b = − d .
Substituting these results into the left-hand side we get 0 = a − c and 0 = b − d .
Therefore a = b = c = d = 0 and there is only 1 solution.
I have a slight mistake. In fact we get either a = − c and b = d , or a = c and b = − d .
However, combining all four original equations gives a + c = b + d . So now we have a = − c implies b = d , and also implies b = − d . So d = 0 and the rest follows.
I did this originally, and then thought I could remove the second condition for some reason.
Yes, there are two cases. They are really the same, of course, by "rotating" the variables.
i did it the exact same way
For easy reference, we number the four equations (1), (2), (3), (4), in that order.
Adding the four equations together gives us a b + b c + c d + a d = 0 , or ( a + c ) ( b + d ) = 0 This implies a = − c or b = − d , so we consider two cases:
Case 1 : a = − c .
Substituting this into equation (1), we get − b c = b − c , or b c = c − b . But from equation (2) we know that b c = c − d , therefore b = d .
Substituting d = b and a = − c into equation (3), we get b c = b + c . We also know from above that b c = c − b , so adding the two equations together yields 2 b c = 2 c
Therefore c = 0 or b = 1 . If c = 0 then a = − c = 0 and from equation (1), 0 = b − 0 so b = d = 0 . We get one solution ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 )
On the other hand, if b = 1 then d = b = 1 and since a = − c , equation (1) would give us − c = 1 − c , which is not possible. Hence case 1 only gives us one solution ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 )
Case 2 : b = − d .
This is solved very similarly to case 1. We would arrive at a = c and by the symmetry of the equations, we would also get only one solution ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 )
Thus there is only 1 quadruple of complex numbers satisfying the four equations.
Nice job!
Nicely done!
Adding the four equations gives us a b + b c + c d + a d = 0
Furthermore, this can be rewritten: a b + b c + c d + a d = a ( b + d ) + c ( b + d ) = ( a + c ) ( b + d ) = 0
So either a = − c and/or b = − d .
Starting with substituting the first into our original equations we get;
A: a b = b + a , − a b = − a − d , − a d = d − a and a d = a − b
Adding the first two of these we get 0 = b − d , or b = d .
Substituting this in equations A, we get two distinct equations:
a b = b + a and − a b = b − a . Adding them results in 0 = 2 b , or b = 0 . With that a = b = c = d = 0 .
Similarly we get the same result when substituting b = − d in the original equations.
Subtracting Eqs (1) and (2), we have ( a − c ) b = b + d − 2 c . Similarly, subtracting Eqs (3) and (4), we have ( a − c ) d = ( 2 a − b − d ) . Adding these two eqs, we have ( a − c ) ( b + d ) = 2 ( a − c ) . This implies that either a = c or b + d = 2 . Similarly manipulating other equations, we have either b = d or a + c = 2 .
If a = c , then from Equ (1), we have ( a − 1 ) b = a ⟹ b = 0 ⟹ c = 0 ⟹ a = 0 . From Equ (2), for this case, we have d = 0 . So if a = c , then the only solution is a = b = c = d = 0 .
If b + d = 2 , then adding Equ (1) and Equ (4), we have a ( b + d ) = a − c ⟹ 2 a = a − c ⟹ a = − c . From Equ (1), letting c = − a , we have b = a − 1 a . Also from Equ (3), we have d = a + 1 a . Adding, we get a − 1 a + a + 1 a = 2 ⟹ a 2 − 1 2 a 2 = 2 which is impossible.
Similar, the case a + c = 2 is also impossible.
So the only solution is a = b = c = d = 0 .
Nice original observations (first paragraph)! It is refreshingly different from what most people did, and I am sure that the problem can be solved this way. However I cannot quite follow your argument after that. Why do you say that ( a − 1 ) b = a implies that b = 0 ?
We label the equations ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) , ( 3 ) , ( 4 ) in the order they are given for easier reference.
Adding all the equations together yields a b + b c + c d + a d = 0 → ( a + c ) ( b + d ) = 0 → a = − c or b = − d .
We let a = − c . Then ( 1 ) becomes a b = b + ( a ) and ( 2 ) becomes b ( − a ) = ( − a ) − d → a b = a + d . Thus, we have that a b = a + b = a + d → b = d , and so ( 4 ) becomes a ( b ) = a − b .
Subtracting ( 4 ) ( a b = a − b ) from ( 1 ) ( a b = a + b ) yields a b − a b = b + a − ( a − b ) → 2 b = 0 → b = 0 , and so b = d = 0 . Finally, plugging b = 0 back in to ( 1 ) gives a ⋅ ( 0 ) = ( 0 ) − c → c = 0 , and so a = 0 .
This tells us that the ordered quadruple ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) is a solution to the given system of equations. If we now let b = − d , we see that we can do essentially the same manipulations (but focusing on ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) rather than ( 1 ) and ( 4 ) ) to again obtain only ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) as a possible solution to the system of equations.
Therefore, the only ordered quadruple of complex numbers ( a , b , c , d ) that satisfies the given system of equations is ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) , and so our answer is 1 .
This is nice solution. Just one issue: when you wrote that "This tells us that the ordered quadruple ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) is a solution..." you really meant that it was the only solution in that case.
Considering the symmetry of the equations, we are inspired to add them, yielding a b + b c + c d + a d = ( a + c ) ( b + d ) = 0 . This means that at least one of ( a + c ) or ( b + d ) is 0. Based on the previous, we generate the following cases: case 1: ( a + c ) = 0 ⟹ a = − c , case 2: ( b + d ) = 0 ⟹ b = − d . Substituting a = − c from case 1 into the first and second original equations, we obtain a b = a + b and a b = a + d . Subtracting the two new equations gives ( a + b ) − ( a + d ) = ( b − d ) = a b − a b = 0 , thus b = d . We then add the first and second original equations; we have, b ( a + c ) = b − d = 0 . We note that if b = 0 , then a = b = c = d = 0 , and likewise when a + c = 0 . We solve for case 2 in a similar fashion and obtain the same result as in case 1. Therefore, the only solution of complex numbers ( a , b , c , d ) that satisfy the system of equations is ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) , giving only 1 ordered quadruple.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Adding all of the 4 equations, we get a b + b c + c d + a d = 0 , so ( a + c ) ( b + d ) = 0 . Hence either a + c = 0 or b + d = 0 .
Case 1 . a + c = 0 .
We now know that a = − c . We now substitute. The 4 equations become − b c = b − c , b c = c − d , c d = d − ( − c ) --> c d = c + d , and − c d = − c − b --> c d = c + b . Take note of the last 2 equations: c d = c + d and c d = c + b . Thus c + d = c + b , and b = d .
Now we substitute d for b to these 4 equations: − b c = b − c , b c = c − d , c d = c + d , and c d = c + b . We get − d c = d − c , d c = c − d , c d = c + d , and c d = c + d . The first two and last two are identical, so we just take the 2nd and the 3rd.
We have c d = c − d and c d = c + d . Hence c − d = c + d and d = 0 . Thus c ( 0 ) = c − 0 --> c = 0 . We could also get that a = b = 0 because a = − c and b = d .
Hence, we only have ( a , b , c , d ) = ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) .
Case 2 . b + d = 0 .
Actually, this case is identical to the first because we will just be shifting the values of ( a , b , c , d ) . one time to the right, so ( a , b , c , d ) becomes ( b , c , d , a ) . Since the first case only has ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) , the second also would only have ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) .
Thus, there is only 1 such ordered quadruple of complex numbers.