Out for a hike

Suppose that to hike a distance L L while carrying nothing, your body requires an amount L γ 0 L \gamma_0 of food, and that when you carry an extra weight M M in your backpack, your body is less efficient and requires the amount of food L γ 0 ( 1 + M W body ) L \gamma_0 \left(1+\frac{M}{W_\text{body}}\right) where W body W_\text{body} is the weight of your body.

If you start out with the weight M M of food in your ultralight (weightless) backpack, how far (in miles) can you hike in total?

Assumptions

  • All your energy comes from eating the food in your backpack.
  • You eat the food as needed for your energy needs.
  • M = 50 lb M=\SI{50}{lb} , W body = 160 lb , W_\text{body}=\SI{160}{lb}, γ 0 = 1 2 1 lb food per mile . \gamma_0=12^{-1}\si{lb\ food\ per\ mile}.
  • American pack weights are measured in pounds, which are equivalent to roughly 0.454 kg . \SI{0.454}{\kilo\gram}.


The answer is 522.113.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Tom Verhoeff
Apr 6, 2017

Let M ( d ) M(d) be the amount of food in the backpack after having walked distance d d . Then we have M ( 0 ) = 50 M(0)=50 and M ( d ) = γ 0 ( 1 + M ( d ) W body ) M^\prime(d) = -\gamma_0\big(1+\frac{M(d)}{W_{\text{body}}}\big) . Solving this ODE gives us M ( d ) = 210 e d 1920 160 M(d)=210 e^{-\frac{d}{1920}}-160 . Solving for M ( d ) = 0 M(d)=0 (in the reals), yields d = 1920 log 21 16 522.113 d=1920\log\frac{21}{16}\approx522.113 .

Food depletion is almost linear (compare to upper line 50 d / 12 50-d/12 ):

Nice use of the plot. Are you using Mathematica?

Josh Silverman Staff - 4 years, 2 months ago

First I will find amount of food d m dm needed to travel distance d l dl with m m food in backpack.

d m = γ 0 d l ( 1 + m W b o d y ) \displaystyle dm=\gamma_0 dl (1+\frac{m}{W_{body}})

This can be easily transformed to the following integral

d l = d m γ 0 ( 1 + m W b o d y ) \displaystyle dl=\frac{dm}{\gamma_0 (1+\frac{m}{W_{body}})}

d l = W b o d y γ 0 d m ( W b o d y + m ) \displaystyle dl=\frac{W_{body}}{\gamma_0}\frac{dm}{ (W_{body}+m)}

0 L d l = W b o d y γ 0 0 M d m ( W b o d y + m ) \displaystyle \int_{0}^{L}{dl}=\frac{W_{body}}{\gamma_0} \int_{0}^{M}{ \frac{dm}{ (W_{body}+m)}}

And by integrating this we get:

L = W b o d y γ 0 ln M + W b o d y W b o d y 522.11 miles \displaystyle L= \frac{ W_{body} }{\gamma_0} \ln { \frac{M+W_{body}}{ W_{body}} }\approx 522.11 \text{ miles}

What if I eat all the food first then start hiking? In that case I can go 600 miles. I know I cannot eat 50lbs all at ones but there is no assumption for that.

Aydin Khatamnejad - 5 years, 7 months ago

I took γ = 12 \gamma = 12 and so got the wrong answer :(

Snehal Shekatkar - 5 years, 1 month ago

Wouldn't the limits of integration be switched ( in regards to M )?

Eric Roberts - 4 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Nevermind...I see "little" m goes from 0 to M

Eric Roberts - 4 years, 11 months ago

Yeah I did the same thing But WHAT is this why am i getting answer as 3.62 miles and I also took gamma as 12 what 's wrong with it ??? My integration is perfect as I have done exactly the same thing as this !!! But what about gamma not being 12 ??? why ?? please someone help.

Ayon Ghosh - 3 years, 9 months ago

Oh damn I see it is 1/12 not 12 heck what a foolish mistake !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ayon Ghosh - 3 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...