Pairs upstairs

Calculus Level 5

Calculate

ln ( γ 1 { 1 , 1 } γ 2014 { 1 , 1 } e γ 1 γ 2 e γ 2 γ 3 e γ 2013 γ 2014 ) . \displaystyle\ln\left(\sum\limits_{\gamma_1\in\{-1,1\}}\ldots\sum\limits_{\gamma_{2014}\in\{-1,1\}}e^{\gamma_1\gamma_2}e^{\gamma_2\gamma_3}\ldots e^{\gamma_{2013}\gamma_{2014}}\right).

Note: This kind of summation has applications in the statistical mechanics of magnets and simple models of neural networks.


The answer is 2269.2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Patrick Corn
Mar 6, 2014

Letting S n S_n be the sum, we note that S n = e S n 1 + e 1 S n 1 S_n = e S_{n-1} + e^{-1} S_{n-1} by separating it into the cases where γ n = γ n 1 \gamma_n = \gamma_{n-1} and γ n = γ n 1 \gamma_n = -\gamma_{n-1} .

So S n = ( e + e 1 ) S n 1 S_n = (e+e^{-1})S_{n-1} .

Applying this inductively, we get S n = ( e + e 1 ) n 2 S 2 S_n = (e+e^{-1})^{n-2}S_2 .

Since S 2 = 2 ( e + e 1 ) S_2 = 2(e+e^{-1}) , we get S n = 2 ( e + e 1 ) n 1 S_n = 2(e+e^{-1})^{n-1} .

So ln S n = ln 2 + ( n 1 ) ln ( e + e 1 ) \boxed{\ln S_n = \ln 2 + \left(n-1\right)\ln \left(e + e^{-1}\right)} .

Plug in n = 2014 n = 2014 to get ln ( S 2014 ) 2269.2 \ln(S_{2014}) \approx 2269.2 .

Why not ln S n = 2014 ln ( e + e 1 ) \ln S_n=2014\ln(e+e^{-1}) by the method of generating functions?

Cody Johnson - 6 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...