Path of Less Resistance

When this circuit is connected to a certain voltage source, a current of 21 mA 21 \text{ mA} runs through it.

But when points A A and B B are connect by a wire, the current in the circuit increases to 25 mA 25 \text{ mA} .

Determine the value of resistance R R in ohms.


The answer is 8.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

The problem

The resistance of the original circuit and the new circuit are, respectively, R 1 = ( 3 + 12 ) ( 12 + R ) ; R 2 = ( 3 12 ) + ( 12 R ) . R_1 = (3 + 12) | (12 + R);\ \ \ \ \ R_2 = (3 | 12) + (12 | R). Here, a b a|b is a shorthand notation for the parallel-circuit calculation: a b = 1 / ( 1 a + 1 b ) = a b / ( a + b ) a|b = 1/(\tfrac1a+\tfrac1b) = ab/(a+b) .

The solution

The equation we need to solve is 21 R 1 = 25 R 2 21\cdot R_1 = 25\cdot R_2 . It is easy to prove that R = 8 \boxed{R = 8} is a solution: R 1 = ( 3 + 12 ) ( 12 + 8 ) = 15 20 = 60 7 ; R 2 = ( 3 12 ) + ( 12 8 ) = 12 5 + 24 5 = 36 5 ; 21 60 7 = 180 = 25 36 5 . R_1 = (3 + 12) | (12 + 8) = 15 | 20 = \frac{60}7;\ \ \ \ R_2 = (3 | 12) + (12 | 8) = \frac{12}5 + \frac{24}5 = \frac{36}5; \\ 21\cdot\frac{60}7 = 180 = 25\cdot\frac{36}5. The question, of course, is how this solution is found.

The method

Expanding the expressions for R 1 , R 2 R_1, R_2 we have R 1 = ( 3 + 12 ) ( 12 + R ) = 15 ( 12 + R ) 27 + R ; R 2 = ( 3 12 ) + ( 12 R ) = 12 5 + 12 R 12 + R . R_1 = (3 + 12) | (12 + R) = \frac{15(12+R)}{27+R}; \\ R_2 = (3 | 12) + (12 | R) = \frac{12}5 + \frac{12R}{12+R}. Thus we obtain the equation 25 ( 12 5 + 12 R 12 + R ) = 21 15 ( 12 + R ) 27 + R . 25\left(\frac{12}5 + \frac{12R}{12+R}\right) = 21\cdot \frac{15(12+R)}{27+R}. We simplify and divide the entire equation by the common factor 15: 4 + 20 R 12 + R = 21 ( 12 + R ) 27 + R . 4 + \frac{20R}{12+R} = \frac{21(12+R)}{27+R}. Multiply everything by the product of the denominators, ( 12 + R ) ( 27 + R ) (12+R)(27+R) : 4 ( 12 + R ) ( 27 + R ) + 20 R ( 27 + R ) 21 ( 12 + R ) ( 12 + R ) = 0 ; 4(12+R)(27+R) + 20R(27+R) - 21(12+R)(12+R) = 0; expand and collect like terms: 3 R 2 + 192 R 1728 = 0 , R 2 + 64 R 576 = 0. 3R^2 + 192R - 1728 = 0,\ \ \ \ R^2 + 64R - 576 = 0. Solve this, e.g. by splitting off a square: ( R + 32 ) 2 = 1024 + 576 = 1600 , R = 32 ± 1600 = 72 or 8. (R + 32)^2 = 1024 + 576 = 1600,\ \ \ R = -32\pm\sqrt{1600} = -72\ \ \text{or}\ \ 8. The negative solution makes no physical sense, so we found that R = 8 R = 8 .

Ah !! Very nicely done !

Akshat Sharda - 5 years, 4 months ago

I I = 25 24 ( R + 12 ) 2 ( R + 2 ) ( R + 27 ) × 21 m A \frac{25}{24} \frac{(R + 12)^2}{(R + 2)(R + 27)} \times 21~mA

Checked for R R = 0 Ω \Omega to 48 Ω \Omega for examples, found that R R = 8 Ω \Omega for 25 mA.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 4 months ago

Yes. Used the same quadratic solution. Also tried varying R from 6 to 12. the voltage is 180mV.

Niranjan Khanderia - 5 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...