Pendulum with Oscillating Base

A particle of mass m = 1 m = 1 is attached to one end of a massless rigid rod of length = 1 \ell = 1 . The other end of the rod moves sinusoidally and has coordinates ( x 0 , y 0 ) = ( 0 , 0.1 cos ( 20 π t ) ) (x_0,y_0) = \Big( 0, 0.1 \cos (20 \pi t) \Big) . The ambient gravitational acceleration g = 10 g = 10 is in the negative y y direction.

At time t = 0 t = 0 , the rod makes an angle θ = 5 \theta = 5 degrees with the positive y y axis. The quantity θ ˙ \dot{\theta} is zero at this time.

What angle (in degrees) does the rod make with the positive y y axis at time t = 2.4 t = 2.4 ?

Bonus: Make a plot of the angle until t = 10 t = 10 . What remarkable behavior does this system exhibit?

Note: This is similar to a setup known as Kapitza's pendulum .


The answer is 1.684.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Karan Chatrath
Sep 6, 2020

The coordinates of the mass are:

x = L sin θ x = L\sin{\theta} y = cos ( 20 π t ) 10 + L cos θ y = \frac{\cos(20 \pi t)}{10} + L\cos{\theta}

The kinetic energy of the mass is (expression shown after simplification:

T = m 2 ( x ˙ 2 + y ˙ 2 ) \mathcal{T} = \frac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2) T = m 2 ( L 2 θ ˙ 2 + 4 π 2 sin 2 ( 20 π t ) + 4 π L θ ˙ sin θ sin ( 20 π t ) ) \mathcal{T} = \frac{m}{2}\left(L^2\dot{\theta}^2 + 4 \pi^2 \sin^2(20 \pi t) + 4 \pi L \dot{\theta}\sin{\theta} \sin(20 \pi t)\right) T = θ ˙ 2 2 + 2 π 2 sin 2 ( 20 π t ) + 2 π L θ ˙ sin θ sin ( 20 π t ) \implies \mathcal{T} = \frac{\dot{\theta}^2}{2} + 2 \pi^2 \sin^2(20 \pi t) + 2 \pi L \dot{\theta}\sin{\theta} \sin(20 \pi t)

The potential energy of the mass is:

V = m g y \mathcal{V} = mgy V = cos ( 20 π t ) + 10 cos θ \implies \mathcal{V} = \cos(20 \pi t) + 10\cos{\theta}

The equation of motion can be found by applying Lagrange's equation as follows:

d d t ( T θ ˙ ) T θ + V θ = 0 \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{T}}{\partial \dot{\theta}}\right) - \frac{\partial \mathcal{T}}{\partial \theta} + \frac{\partial \mathcal{V}}{\partial \theta}=0

Crunching out all derivatives yields:

θ ¨ = 10 sin θ 40 π 2 sin θ cos ( 20 π t ) \boxed{\ddot{\theta} = 10\sin{\theta} - 40 \pi^2 \sin{\theta} \cos(20 \pi t)} θ ( 0 ) = 5 π 180 \theta(0) = \frac{5 \pi}{180} θ ˙ ( 0 ) = 0 \dot{\theta}(0) = 0

I am leaving out the part involving numerical integration.

I will now focus on the bonus part of this problem. The truly remarkable quality of this system is that it is periodic and exhibits stability. One would have expected the pendulum to fall due to gravity from its point of unstable equilibrium. However, the bob of the pendulum oscillates between ± 5 \pm 5 ^{\circ} about its natural unstable equilibrium. So the sinusoidal driving motion has a stabilising effect on the pendulum's motion.

A plot of angle vs. time is as follows:

@Karan Chatrath Nice solution, Upvoted.
Place check your last 1 hour notification.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 1 week ago

WTF, what a bug, I am, hitting the Helpful button but it is still showing 0 Upvote.

Talulah Riley - 9 months, 1 week ago

I was the first to solve, but I kind of fluke-solved the problem; nice solution by the way :) I looked at the Kapitza pendulum Wikipedia page, and I found a different differential equation describing the pendulum's behaviour.

I know that the one you have formulated is right. The one I found on Wikipedia, using Lagrangian Mechanics, was this:

θ ¨ = ( g + α f 2 cos ( f t ) ) sin ( θ ) l \displaystyle \ddot{\theta} = -(g+\alpha f^2 \cos(ft)) \frac{\sin(\theta)}{l}

Where f f is the frequency of the support oscillation, α \alpha is the amplitude of the support oscillation, and θ \theta is the angle to the negative y axis.

Note that that angle is to the negative y axis, and is therefore the supplement of the generalised coordinate above.

I tried numerically integrating, yet I wasn't getting the desired answer. I wonder why.

Krishna Karthik - 9 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

I think you will find that the Wikipedia equation is for a slightly different angle.

Mark Hennings - 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...