The income of Amala is more than that of Bimala and less than that of Kamala . If Kamala's income goes down by and Bimala's goes up by , then the percentage by which Kamala's income would exceed Bimala's is nearest to _____
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let:
a = Amala’s Income
b = Bimala’s Income
k = Kamala’s Income
And let's use subscripts 1 and 2 to refer to the initial and final incomes (example: a 1 )
Initial Conditions
The income of Amala is 20% more than that of Bimala. → a 1 = b 1 ( 1 . 2 )
The income of Amala is 20% less than that of Kamala. → a 1 = k 1 ( 1 − 0 . 2 ) = k 1 ( 0 . 8 )
Combining the two above statements tells us:
a 1 = b 1 ( 1 . 2 ) = k 1 ( 0 . 8 )
or, more simply,
1 . 5 b 1 = k 1
Final Conditions
Kamala's income goes down by 4%. → k 2 = k 1 ( 1 − 0 . 0 4 ) = k 1 ( 0 . 9 6 )
Bimala's income goes up by 10%. → b 2 = b 1 ( 1 + 0 . 1 0 ) = b 1 ( 1 . 1 0 )
Calculations
So we essentially need to find the k 2 to b 2 ratio.
From here, just substitute the values to solve for one variable, and then you can find the answer, which ends up being 1.44/1.1=1.31, indicating a 31% increase.