Perfect Square Patterns

Dividing 1 2 1^2 by 3 gives a remainder of 1.

Dividing 2 2 2^2 by 3 gives a remainder of 1 as well.

Is it true that dividing any perfect square by 3 will give a remainder of 1?

No, it is not true, you can also get a remainder of 0 and 2. Yes, it is true. No, it is not true, you can also get a remainder of 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Alex Li
May 24, 2016

A neat solution: All numbers can be written as 3k, 3k + 1, or 3k + 2, where k is a integer. Square each of these and find the terms not divisible by 3.

Case 1. 3k (3k)^2 = 9k^2 -> Remainder will be 0.

Case 2. 3k + 1 (3k+1)^2 = 9k^2 + 6k + 1 -> Remainder will be 1.

Case 3. 3k + 2 (3k+2)^2 = 9k^2 + 12k + 4 -> Remainder will be 4, or 1.

Finn C
May 15, 2016

I just squared 3, 6, 9... et cetera, and saw they're all divisible by three with a remainder of zero.

Aaron Tsai
May 14, 2016

Let n n be a perfect square. Assume n 2 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv 2\pmod{3} . We have:

n 0 2 , 1 2 , or 2 2 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv 0^{2},1^{2},\textrm{or }2^{2} \pmod{3} (this holds true since n n is a perfect square)

n 0 , 1 , or 4 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv 0,1,\textrm{or }4 \pmod{3}

0 0 and 1 1 check out. However,

n 4 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv 4 \pmod{3}

n 1 ( m o d 3 ) \implies n\equiv 1 \pmod{3}

which contradicts the original assumption n 2 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv 2 \pmod{3} . Therefore, n n cannot be a perfect square with remainder 2. So, a perfect square may only have remainder 0 0 or 1 1 when divided by 3.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...