f ( x ) = 2 x − 4 x 2 − 6 x + 6 g ( x ) = x − d a x 2 + b x + c
You are given two functions f and g above, where a , b , c , and d are unknown constants. Also, you are given the following information about the function g :
It has the same vertical asymptote as f .
Its diagonal asymptote is perpendicular to that of f , and these two asymptotes intersect each other on the y -axis.
The graphs of f and g have two intersection points. One of them is at x = − 2 . (In other words, f ( − 2 ) = g ( − 2 ) .)
What is the value of the other x -coordinate where f and g intersect?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Beautiful! It was fun combining so many techniques. Polynomial division, perpendicularity properties, understanding vertical asymptotes, and more.
Now I have some inspiration for finding rational functions with oblique asymptotes with degree > 1 that are perpendicular...
Good and neat problem
The vertical asymptote 'happens where' the function value 'blows up' as the denominator gets very small. For f this is at x = 2 and for g this is at x = d . The fact that the vertical asymptotes of f and g coincide tells us that d = 2 .
The diagonal (slant/oblique) asymptote is found by doing a long division.
f ( x ) = 2 x − 4 x 2 − 6 x + 6 = 2 x − 2 − x − 2 1 so that the slant asymptote of f is given by the line y = 2 x − 2 . Similarly g ( x ) = x − d a x 2 + b x + c = a x + b + a d + x − d c + b d − a d 2 so that the slant asymptote of g is given by the line y = a x + b + a d .
The slope of the asymptote of f equals 2 1 and that of the asymptote of g equals a . The fact that these are perpendicular tells us that a = − 2 .
The fact that both asymptotes intersect at the y-axis tells us (by putting x=0) that − 2 = b + a d , so
b = 4 − 2 = 2 .
( x 2 − 6 x + 6 ) ( x − d ) = ( a x 2 + b x + c ) ( 2 x − 4 ) . Set x = − 2
( 4 + 1 2 + 6 ) ( − 2 − 2 ) = ( 4 a − 2 b + c ) ( − 4 − 4 ) . Fill in the knowns a = − 2 , b = 2 , d = 2 and divide by − 8
1 1 = − 8 − 4 + c
c = 2 3
Now that g is known we repeat this exercise with known g but unknown x, in order to find the other intersection point. 2 x − 4 x 2 − 6 x + 6 = x − 2 − 2 x 2 + 2 x + 2 3 . Multiply by a factor 2 x − 4 .
x 2 − 6 x + 6 = − 4 x 2 + 4 x + 4 6
5 x 2 − 1 0 x − 4 0 = 0
x = 1 0 1 0 ± 1 0 0 + 8 0 0
x = 1 ± 3
x = − 2 ∨ x = 4
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
From the denominator of f we see immediately that x = 2 is the vertical asymptote of f .
g has the same vertical asymptote ( x = 2 ), so its denominator should be x − 2 .
We perform a division and rewrite f as follows: f ( x ) = 2 1 x − 2 − x − 2 1 . This shows that y = 2 1 x − 2 is the diagonal asymptote of f . Its slope is 2 1 and it intersects that y -axis in ( 0 , − 2 ) .
The diagonal asymptotes are perpendicular . This translates into ( slope 1 ⋅ slope 2 = − 1 ), so that the diagonal asymptote of g has slope − 2 .
The asymptotes intersect on the y -axis . The diagonal asymptote of g must therefore also go through ( 0 , − 2 ) . Combined with the previous observation, we now know that the diagonal asymptote of g is the line y = − 2 x − 2 .
The function g has the same pattern as f , and can also be written in the form g ( x ) = − 2 x − 2 + x − 2 λ .
The graphs intersect at x = − 2 . Now f ( − 2 ) = − 2 4 3 , so that g ( − 2 ) = − 2 ⋅ ( − 2 ) − 2 + ( − 2 ) − 2 λ = 2 − 4 λ = − 2 4 3 . The solution is λ = 1 9 . We now know the function g : g ( x ) = − 2 x − 2 + x − 2 1 9 = x − 2 − 2 x 2 + 2 x + 2 3 . (There is really no need to calculate the last expression--it's just in case you're curious about a , b , c , d .)
Finally, we need to find the other intersection point. Equate the two functions: f ( x ) = g ( x ) 2 1 x − 2 − x − 2 1 = − 2 x − 2 + x − 2 1 9 2 2 1 x = x − 2 2 0 2 2 1 x 2 − 5 x − 2 0 = 0 x 2 − 2 x − 8 = 0 ( x + 2 ) ⋅ ( x − 4 ) = 0 x = − 2 or x = 4 .