For a positive integer n , let ϕ ( n ) denote the Euler-Totient Function and p ( n ) denote the number of primes not exceeding n which do not divide n . Then consider the equivalence relation for which p ( n ) = ϕ ( n ) − 2 .
For how many values n , does the relation hold?
If you believe there are infinitely values whereby the relation is true, submit your answer as − 1
Inspired by Zhang Xiaokang's question found here .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Mark Hennings Sir can you please evalute this integrals and i have also posted this 2 questions in discussion section also.
⇒
∫
0
2
π
1
+
α
cos
2
θ
d
θ
⇒
∫
0
2
π
sin
2
θ
1
+
β
cos
2
θ
d
θ
α
,
β
are constants.
Log in to reply
Both of these can be evaluated in terms of complete elliptic integrals... Have a go.
p ( n ) = ϕ ( n ) − 2 iff all but one totients of n are 1 or prime.
Hence, if p 1 , p 2 are the smallest primes which are not factors of n , p 1 2 < n < p 1 3 and n < p 1 p 2 .
(Letting q ? be the product of all primes less than or equal to q )
( p 1 − 1 ) ? must be a factor of n , so ( p 1 − 1 ) ? < p 1 p 2 , and p 1 < 1 1 .
Cases:
p 1 2 3 5 7 p 2 3 5 5 7 7 1 1 1 1 s o l u t i o n s 5 1 4 1 0 4 2 6 0 2 0
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , . . . be a listing, in order, of the primes. We have the following result:
This is readily proved by induction. If N = 5 then 2 . 3 . 5 . 7 . 1 1 = 2 3 1 0 > 2 1 9 7 = 1 3 3 . If N ≥ 5 and p 1 p 2 ⋯ p N > p N + 1 3 , then p 1 p 2 ⋯ p N p N + 1 > p N + 1 4 > 8 p N + 1 3 = ( 2 p N + 1 ) 3 > p N + 2 3 by Bertrand's Postulate.
The condition p ( M ) = φ ( M ) − 2 states that there is exactly one integer between 2 and M − 1 (inclusive) which is coprime to M and yet not prime. Thus any integer M which is not divisible by a prime q and which is greater than q 3 cannot satisfy this condition, since then q 2 and q 3 would be two such integers.
Thus, if M is a positive integer such that p ( M ) = φ ( M ) − 2 , and if q is a prime which does not divide M , then M ≤ q 3 .
Suppose now that M is a positive integer such that p ( M ) = φ ( M ) − 2 , and suppose that N is the smallest integer such that p N does not divide M . Then M ≤ p N 3 . Since p 1 p 2 ⋯ p N − 1 ≤ M ≤ p N 3 , we deduce that N − 1 ≤ 4 , so that N ≤ 5 . Thus M ≤ 1 1 3 = 1 3 3 1 .
It is easy enough to run a computer check of the numbers between 1 and 1 3 3 1 to find the integers M such that p ( M ) = φ ( M ) − 2 . They are 5 , 1 0 , 1 4 , 2 0 , 4 2 , 6 0 . Thus there are 6 such integers.