ϕ ( n ) \phi(n) and p ( n ) p(n) 2

Number Theory Level pending

For a positive integer n n , let ϕ ( n ) \phi(n) denote the Euler-Totient Function and p ( n ) p(n) denote the number of primes not exceeding n n which do not divide n n . Then consider the equivalence relation for which p ( n ) = ϕ ( n ) 2 p(n) = \phi(n) - 2 .

For how many values n n , does the relation hold?

If you believe there are infinitely values whereby the relation is true, submit your answer as 1 -1

Inspired by Zhang Xiaokang's question found here .


The answer is 6.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Mark Hennings
May 22, 2020

Let p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , . . . p_1,p_2,p_3,... be a listing, in order, of the primes. We have the following result:

If N 5 N \ge 5 , then p 1 p 2 p N > p N + 1 3 p_1p_2\,\cdots\,p_N > p_{N+1}^3 .

This is readily proved by induction. If N = 5 N=5 then 2.3.5.7.11 = 2310 > 2197 = 1 3 3 2.3.5.7.11 = 2310 > 2197 =13^3 . If N 5 N \ge 5 and p 1 p 2 p N > p N + 1 3 p_1p_2\cdots p_N > p_{N+1}^3 , then p 1 p 2 p N p N + 1 > p N + 1 4 > 8 p N + 1 3 = ( 2 p N + 1 ) 3 > p N + 2 3 p_1p_2 \cdots p_N p_{N+1} \,>\, p_{N+1}^4 \,>\, 8p_{N+1}^3 = (2p_{N+1})^3 > p_{N+2}^3 by Bertrand's Postulate.

The condition p ( M ) = φ ( M ) 2 p(M) = \varphi(M) - 2 states that there is exactly one integer between 2 2 and M 1 M-1 (inclusive) which is coprime to M M and yet not prime. Thus any integer M M which is not divisible by a prime q q and which is greater than q 3 q^3 cannot satisfy this condition, since then q 2 q^2 and q 3 q^3 would be two such integers.

Thus, if M M is a positive integer such that p ( M ) = φ ( M ) 2 p(M) = \varphi(M) - 2 , and if q q is a prime which does not divide M M , then M q 3 M \le q^3 .

Suppose now that M M is a positive integer such that p ( M ) = φ ( M ) 2 p(M) = \varphi(M) - 2 , and suppose that N N is the smallest integer such that p N p_N does not divide M M . Then M p N 3 M \le p_N^3 . Since p 1 p 2 p N 1 M p N 3 p_1p_2 \cdots p_{N-1} \le M \le p_N^3 , we deduce that N 1 4 N-1 \le 4 , so that N 5 N \le 5 . Thus M 1 1 3 = 1331 M \le 11^3 = 1331 .

It is easy enough to run a computer check of the numbers between 1 1 and 1331 1331 to find the integers M M such that p ( M ) = φ ( M ) 2 p(M) = \varphi(M) - 2 . They are 5 , 10 , 14 , 20 , 42 , 60 5, 10, 14, 20, 42, 60 . Thus there are 6 \boxed{6} such integers.

@Mark Hennings Sir can you please evalute this integrals and i have also posted this 2 questions in discussion section also. 0 π 2 1 + α cos 2 θ d θ \Rightarrow \textcolor{#20A900}{\Large\int_{0}^{\frac{π}{2}} \sqrt{1+\alpha \cos^{2}\theta}d\theta} 0 π 2 sin 2 θ 1 + β cos 2 θ d θ \Rightarrow \textcolor{#20A900}{ \Large \int_{0}^{\frac{π}{2}}\sin ^{2}\theta \sqrt{1+\beta \cos ^{2}\theta}d\theta}
α , β \alpha, \beta are constants.

Log in to reply

Both of these can be evaluated in terms of complete elliptic integrals... Have a go.

Mark Hennings - 1 year ago
Alex Burgess
May 22, 2020

p ( n ) = ϕ ( n ) 2 p(n) = \phi (n) - 2 iff all but one totients of n n are 1 or prime.

Hence, if p 1 , p 2 p_1, p_2 are the smallest primes which are not factors of n n , p 1 2 < n < p 1 3 p_1^2 < n < p_1^3 and n < p 1 p 2 n < p_1 p_2 .

(Letting q ? q? be the product of all primes less than or equal to q q )

( p 1 1 ) ? (p_1-1)? must be a factor of n n , so ( p 1 1 ) ? < p 1 p 2 (p_1-1)? < p_1 p_2 , and p 1 < 11 p_1 < 11 .


Cases:

p 1 p 2 s o l u t i o n s 2 3 5 5 3 5 14 7 10 20 5 7 11 42 7 11 60 \begin{matrix} p_1 & p_2 & solutions & \\ 2 & 3 & 5\\ &5\\ 3&5&14\\ &7&10&20\\ 5&7\\ &11&42\\ 7&11&60 \end{matrix}

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...