Let denote the complete graph with vertices. Which of the following is true?
I.
is planar.
II.
is planar.
III.
is planar.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We will derive a necessary inequality for planar graphs ( E ≤ 3 n − 6 ), then show the inequality does not hold for K 5 and K 6 . ( K 4 is easily shown to be planar by sketching it.) Below, we will use n , E , and F to denote the number of vertices, edges, and faces, respectively.
Consider K n , a complete graph with n > 2 vertices (and hence E ≥ 3 ). To be fully enclosed, each face must be at least a triangle. So, at least 3 edges bound each face. To relate faces with edges, note that 3 F will double-count the minimum number of edges, since each edge has two sides and hence bounds two faces. So, we must divide this count by two: E ≥ 3 F / 2 , or F ≤ 2 E / 3 .
Euler's formula holds for any planar graph: n − E + F = 2 . Substituting the above inequality into Euler's formula: F = 2 − n + E ≤ 2 E / 3 .
Hence, a planar graph with n > 2 and E ≥ 3 implies that E ≤ 3 n − 6 .
Now, using this condition, let's see if K 4 , K 5 , and K 6 are planar. We know that the number of edges in K n is ( 2 n ) = n ( n − 1 ) / 2 . So:
K 4 is planar , since we can easily draw by hand a planar graph with four vertices where each is connected to the others. Note that the inequality above is true for all planar graphs, including K 4 . But, it may also hold for non-planar graphs, so the inequality is not proof by itself that K 4 is planar.
K 5 : n = 5 , E 5 = ( 2 5 ) = 1 0 . Is it planar? E 5 > 3 ⋅ 5 − 6 , so K 5 cannot be planar .
K 6 : n = 6 , E 6 = ( 2 6 ) = 1 5 . Is it planar? E 6 > 3 ⋅ 6 − 6 , so K 6 cannot be planar .