Polynomials with no Common Factors

Algebra Level 5

Find the number of positive integers n 1000 , n\leq 1000, such that the polynomials F n ( a , b , c ) = a ( b c ) n + b ( c a ) n + c ( a b ) n F_n(a, b, c) = a(b-c)^n+b(c-a)^n+c(a-b)^n and F 4 ( a , b , c ) = a ( b c ) 4 + b ( c a ) 4 + c ( a b ) 4 F_4 (a, b, c) = a(b-c)^4+b(c-a)^4+c(a-b)^4 have no common non-constant factors.

Details and assumptions

For n = 1 n=1 , we have F 1 = 0 F_1 = 0 , and hence F 4 F 1 F_4 \mid F_1 .


The answer is 665.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

C Lim
Oct 24, 2013

Let A = b c , B = c a , C = a b A = b-c, B = c-a, C = a-b , so we have:

F n = a A n + b B n + c C n . F_n = a\cdot A^n + b\cdot B^n + c\cdot C^n.

Suppose A , B , C A, B, C are roots of the cubic equation X 3 P X 2 + Q X R = 0 X^3 - P X^2 + Q X - R = 0 . This gives us P = A + B + C = 0 P = A+B+C = 0 , Q = A B + B C + C A Q = AB+BC+CA and R = A B C R = ABC . Furthermore, since A , B , C A, B, C satisfy the said cubic equation, we have (since P = 0 P=0 ):

A 3 P A 2 + Q A R = 0 a A n + 1 = Q ( a A n 1 ) + R ( a A n 2 ) . A^3 - PA^2 + QA - R = 0 \implies a A^{n+1} = - Q(a A^{n-1}) + R(a A^{n-2}).

Similarly, we have:

b B n + 1 = Q ( b B n 1 ) + R ( b B n 2 ) c C n + 1 = Q ( c C n 1 ) + R ( c C n 2 ) \begin{aligned}b B^{n+1} &= - Q(b B^{n-1}) + R(b B^{n-2})\\ c C^{n+1} &= - Q(c C^{n-1}) + R(c C^{n-2})\end{aligned}

Adding these two equations and the earlier one, we get:

F n + 1 = Q F n 1 + R F n 2 . F_{n+1} = -Q\cdot F_{n-1} + R\cdot F_{n-2}.

In particular, since F 1 = 0 F_1=0 , we have:

F 4 = Q F 2 + R F 1 = Q F 2 F_4 = -QF_2 + RF_1 = -QF_2

It is easy to check that both F 2 F_2 and Q Q are irreducible so it remains to find all polynomials F n F_n which are divisible by Q Q or F 2 F_2 .

-

Let's consider Q Q first. From the recurrence equation F n + 1 = Q F n 1 + R F n 2 F_{n+1} = -Q F_{n-1} + R F_{n-2} we see that F n + 3 F_{n+3} is a multiple of Q Q if and only if F n F_n is. Hence, it suffices to look at just F 1 , F 2 , F 3 F_1, F_2, F_3 . Since F 1 F_1 is the only one out of these three which is divisible by Q Q , we conclude:

  • F n F_n is divisible by Q Q if and only if n 1 ( m o d 3 ) n \equiv 1 \pmod 3 .

Next up, we need to find all n n for which F 2 F n F_2 | F_n . We claim that n = 1 , 2 , 4 n=1,2,4 are the only solutions. To do that, we find rational numbers a , b , c a, b, c satisfying F 2 ( a , b , c ) = 0 F_2(a,b,c) = 0 . That was hard, but after some effort, we found:

a = 10 3 , b = 14 , c = 1 a = -\frac {10} 3, \ b=14, \ c=1

We claim that F n ( a , b , c ) 0 F_n(a,b,c) \ne 0 for n 5 n\ge 5 . Indeed, suppose F n ( a , b , c ) = 0 F_n(a,b,c) = 0 . Then:

10 3 1 3 n + 14 ( 13 3 ) n + ( 52 3 ) n = 0. -\frac {10} 3 13^n + 14\left(\frac {13} 3\right)^n + \left(-\frac{52}3\right)^n = 0.

After some simplification, we obtain:

14 + ( 4 ) n = 10 × 3 n 1 . 14 + (-4)^n = 10\times 3^{n-1}.

It is easy to show that this has no integer solution for n 5 n\ge 5 .

  • If n n is even, we get: 10 = 14 × 3 ( n 1 ) + 4 × ( 4 / 3 ) n 1 4 × ( 4 / 3 ) n 1 10 = 14\times 3^{-(n-1)} + 4\times (4/3)^{n-1} \ge 4\times (4/3)^{n-1} . So n 4 n \le 4 .
  • If n n is even, we get 14 = 10 × 3 n 1 + 4 n 14 = 10\times 3^{n-1} + 4^n ; obviously it fails for n > 1 n>1 .

Conclusion

The only F n F_n which share a common factor with F 4 F_4 are those where n 1 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv 1 \pmod 3 or n = 2 n=2 . Hence the answer is 1000 334 1 = 665 1000 - 334 - 1 = \fbox{665} .

Seriously, that was hard. O_O

C Lim - 7 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks! We consider the last question free frag, and almost anything goes (within reason). It does vary wildly in difficulty.

The initial substitution is motivated from the setup of the question, and makes the polynomials much easier to deal with.

I like the way you showed F 2 m o d F n F_2 \mod F_n . Our way was much more brutal, and worked with the polynomials directly.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 7 months ago

Very nice.

An even nicer example, when looking for solutions of F 2 ( a , b , c ) = 0 F_2(a,b,c)=0 which are not all the same, is a = 15 , b = 6 , c = 1 a=15,b=-6,c=1 . F 2 F_2 is homogeneous in a , b , c a,b,c , so we can assume that c = 1 c=1 . The requirement that F 2 ( a , b , 1 ) = 0 F_2(a,b,1)=0 can be manipulated to give a b = ( a + b ) 2 + ( a + b ) 8 ( a + b ) ab \; = \; \frac{(a+b)^2 + (a+b)}{8-(a+b)} and hence a , b a,b must be solutions of the quadratic 0 = X 2 λ X + λ 2 + λ 8 λ = ( X 1 2 λ ) 2 1 4 ( λ 2 ) 2 λ λ 8 0 \; = \; X^2 - \lambda X + \tfrac{\lambda^2+\lambda}{8-\lambda} \; = \; (X-\tfrac12\lambda)^2 - \tfrac14(\lambda-2)^2\tfrac{\lambda}{\lambda-8} where λ = a + b \lambda = a + b . To ensure that both roots are rational, we need λ λ 8 = u 2 \tfrac{\lambda}{\lambda-8} = u^2 to be the square of a rational. Putting u = 3 u=3 gives us the all-integer solution (putting u = 2 u=2 gives yours).

Mark Hennings - 7 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. That's actually a nice spinoff from the problem.

  • Characterise all rational numbers a , b , c a, b, c for which a ( b c ) 2 + b ( c a ) 2 + c ( a b ) 2 = 0 a(b-c)^2 + b(c-a)^2 + c(a-b)^2 = 0 .

C Lim - 7 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, a very nice question! The equation is homogeneous of degree three, so it appears to be an elliptic curve on the projective plane at the first glance. But it is actually rational: there is a singular point ( a : b : c ) = ( 1 : 1 : 1 ) . (a:b:c)=(1:1:1). In other words, if we say a = 1 + k t , a=1+kt, b = 1 + t , b=1+t, c = 1 , c=1, we get a polynomial of degree three for t t . It will have a double root at t = 0 , t=0, and the other root will vary with k , k, giving all (or almost all) rational solutions. This is pretty much equivalent to what Mark H. did.

Alexander Borisov - 7 years, 7 months ago
Victor Wang
May 20, 2014

Observe that F 0 = a + b + c F_0 = a+b+c , F 1 = 0 F_1 = 0 , F 2 = a ( b c ) 2 = a 2 ( b + c ) + a ( b 2 + c 2 6 b c ) + b c ( b + c ) F_2 = \sum a(b-c)^2 = a^2(b+c)+a(b^2+c^2-6bc)+bc(b+c) , and considering F n F_n as a linear recurrence in a b , b c , c a a-b,b-c,c-a , we get F n = U F n 2 + V F n 3 F_n = U F_{n-2} + V F_{n-3} for n 3 n\ge3 , where U = ( a b ) ( b c ) = 1 2 ( a b ) 2 U = -\sum (a-b)(b-c) = \frac{1}{2}\sum (a-b)^2 and V = ( a b ) V = \prod (a-b) . In particular, F 4 = U F 2 F_4 = UF_2 . It's also easy to check that U , F 2 U,F_2 are irreducible in R [ a , b , c ] \mathbb{R}[a,b,c] (although U U factors as 1 2 ( a + b ω + c ω 2 ) ( a + b ω 2 + c ω ) \frac12(a+b\omega+c\omega^2)(a+b\omega^2+c\omega) , where ω = e 2 π i / 3 \omega = e^{2\pi i/3} , in C \mathbb{C} ), e.g. by noting that any nontrivial factorization of either into two polynomials would have to have both polynomials linear in each variable; for F 2 F_2 , this would imply deg F 2 1 + 1 \deg{F_2} \le 1+1 , and for U U , this would require e 2 π i / 3 R e^{2\pi i/3} \in \mathbb{R} . But R [ a , b , c ] \mathbb{R}[a,b,c] is a UFD, so F n , F 4 F_n,F_4 share a factor iff U F n U\mid F_n or F 2 F n F_2\mid F_n (or both). First we prove that U F n U\mid F_n iff n 1 ( m o d 3 ) n\equiv1\pmod{3} . Taking our recurrence for { F n } \{F_n\} mod U U , we get F n V F n 3 ( m o d U ) F_n \equiv VF_{n-3} \pmod{U} . Yet gcd ( U , V ) = 1 \gcd(U,V) = 1 and F 1 = 0 F_1=0 is the only one among F 0 , F 1 , F 2 F_0,F_1,F_2 divisible by U U , so the result follows by induction. Next, we show that F 2 F n F_2\mid F_n iff n { 1 , 2 , 4 } n\in\{1,2,4\} . The "if" direction is clear; now suppose for contradiction that F 2 F n F_2\mid F_n for some n 3 n\ge3 not equal to 4 4 . Then for reals x , y , z x,y,z , F n ( x , y , z ) = x ( y z ) n = 0 F_n(x,y,z) = \sum x(y-z)^n = 0 whenever F 2 ( x , y , z ) = x ( y z ) 2 = 0 F_2(x,y,z) = \sum x(y-z)^2 = 0 . For convenience, we fix z = 1 z=1 and y > 9000 y>9000 , and take x x to be the smaller root (from the quadratic formula) ( y 2 6 y + 1 ) ( y 2 6 y + 1 ) 2 4 y ( y + 1 ) 2 2 ( y + 1 ) \frac{-(y^2-6y+1) - \sqrt{(y^2-6y+1)^2 - 4y(y+1)^2}}{2(y+1)} = y 2 6 y + 1 + ( y 1 ) y 2 14 y + 1 2 ( y + 1 ) = -\frac{y^2-6y+1+(y-1)\sqrt{y^2-14y+1}}{2(y+1)} of F 2 ( x , y , 1 ) F_2(x,y,1) (a standard way to factor out the y 1 y-1 is to write y 2 6 y + 1 y^2-6y+1 as ( y + 1 ) 2 8 y (y+1)^2 - 8y ). We will derive a contradiction by taking y y sufficiently large. Using 1 y + 1 = 1 y + O ( y 2 ) \frac{1}{y+1} = \frac{1}{y}+O(y^{-2}) and the binomial expansion 1 14 y 1 y 2 = 1 1 2 14 y 1 y 2 + O ( y 2 ) \sqrt{1-\frac{14y-1}{y^2}} = 1 - \frac{1}{2}\frac{14y-1}{y^2} + O(y^{-2}) , we obtain 1 x y 1 = y 3 + y 2 14 y + 1 2 ( y + 1 ) \frac{1-x}{y-1} = \frac{y-3+\sqrt{y^2-14y+1}}{2(y+1)} = 1 12 + O ( y 1 ) 2 ( y + 1 ) = 1 6 y 1 + O ( y 2 ) = 1-\frac{12+O(y^{-1})}{2(y+1)} = 1-6y^{-1} + O(y^{-2}) whence 1 x = y 1 6 + 6 y 1 + O ( y 1 ) 1-x = y-1-6+6y^{-1}+O(y^{-1}) and x y y 1 = 1 1 x y 1 = 2 + O ( y 1 ) \frac{x-y}{y-1} = -1-\frac{1-x}{y-1} = -2+O(y^{-1}) . Since n n is constant, this means $$0 = x + y\left(\frac{1-x}{y-1}\right)^n + \left(\frac{x-y}{y-1}\right)^n $$ is $$(8-y+O(y^{-1})) + y(1-6ny^{-1} + O(y^{-2})) + (-2)^n+O(y^{-1}),$$ which is in turn 8 6 n + ( 2 ) n + O ( y 1 ) . 8-6n + (-2)^n + O(y^{-1}). But 8 6 n + ( 2 ) n 8-6n+(-2)^n is an integer, so this can only hold for y y large if ( 2 ) n = 6 n 8 n { 1 , 2 , 4 } (-2)^n = 6n-8 \implies n\in\{1,2,4\} , contradiction. To finish up, our answer is just the number of positive integers n 1000 n\le 1000 not congruent to 1 ( m o d 3 ) 1\pmod{3} and not equal to 2 2 , i.e. 1000 334 1 = 665 1000-334-1=665 .

Very nice solution. The O ( y 1 ) O(y^{-1}) notation at the end means an unknown function, that has absolute value less than C ( y 1 ) C(y^{-1}) for some fixed constant C , C, for all sufficiently large y y . This "big O O " notation is common in Analysis (the branch of mathematics that rigorously supports Calculus). It is also widely used in other areas of mathematics, as well as in computer science. See Wikipedia page for more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big O notation.

Besides the Analysis technique, known as "asymptotic expansion", the proof uses some algebra: the fact that polynomials in several variables form a unique factorization domain.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

Let j = b c j= b-c , k = c a k=c-a . Note that f ( a , b , c ) F n ( a , b , c ) f ( a , j , k ) F n ( a , j , k ) f (a,b,c) \mid F_n (a,b,c) \iff f(a,j,k) \mid F_n(a,j,k) , where f ( x , y , z ) f(x,y,z) is any polynomial over three variables. We shall continue our analysis with a , j , k a,j,k instead. Plugging these values in the expansion of F n ( a , b , c ) F_n(a,b,c) , it can be shown that F n ( a , j , k ) = a ( j n + k n + ( 1 ) n ( j + k ) n ) + j k ( j n 1 k n 1 ) F_n(a,j,k)= a(j^n + k^n + (-1)^n(j+k)^n) + jk (j^{n-1} - k^{n-1} ) Let's try to factorize F 4 ( a , j , k ) F_4(a,j,k) . Note that F n ( a , j , k ) = a ( j 4 + k 4 + ( j + k ) 4 ) + j k ( j 3 k 3 ) F_n (a,j,k) = a(j^4+k^4+(j+k)^4) + jk (j^3 - k^3) It can be shown that j 4 + k 4 + ( j + k ) 4 = 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) 2 j^4+k^4+(j+k)^4 = 2(j^2+jk+k^2)^2 . We also know that j 3 k 3 = ( j k ) ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) j^3-k^3= (j-k)(j^2+jk+k^2) . It is now obvious that j 2 + j k + k 2 j^2+jk+k^2 is a factor of F 4 ( a , j , k ) F_4(a,j,k) . We can now show that F 4 ( a , j , k ) = ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) ( 2 a ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j k ) ) F_4 (a,j,k) = (j^2+jk+k^2)(2a(j^2+jk+k^2) + jk(j-k)) Note that 2 a ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j k ) j k ( j k ) ( m o d j 2 + j k + k 2 ) 2a(j^2+jk+k^2) + jk(j-k) \equiv jk(j-k) \pmod {j^2+jk+k^2} It then follows that gcd ( j 2 + j k + k 2 , 2 a ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j k ) ) = gcd ( j 2 + j k + k 2 , j k ( j k ) ) \begin{array} {l l }& \gcd (j^2+jk+k^2, 2a(j^2+jk+k^2) + jk(j-k) )\\ = & \gcd (j^2+jk+k^2, jk(j-k) ) \end{array} For some k 0 k \neq 0 , let's consider the equation j k ( j k ) = 0 jk(j-k) = 0 in j j . Note that the roots of this equation are j = 0 j=0 and j = k j=k . However, plugging these values in the polynomial j 2 + j k + k 2 j^2+jk+k^2 , we get k 2 k^2 and 3 k 2 3k^2 respectively, none of which are zero. Hence, gcd ( j 2 + j k + k 2 , j k ( j k ) ) = 1 \gcd (j^2+jk+k^2, jk(j-k) ) = 1 gcd ( j 2 + j k + k 2 , 2 a ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j k ) ) = 1 \implies \gcd (j^2+jk+k^2, 2a(j^2+jk+k^2) + jk(j-k))= 1 We thus conclude the two factors of F 4 ( a , j , k ) F_4(a,j,k) are co-prime. Thus, F n ( a , j , k ) F_n (a,j,k) will share some common factors with F 4 ( a , j , k ) F_4 (a,j,k) iff j 2 + j k + k 2 F n ( a , j , k ) j^2+jk+k^2 \mid F_n (a,j,k) or 2 a ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j k ) ) F n ( a , b , c ) 2a(j^2+jk+k^2) + jk(j-k)) \mid F_n (a,b,c) .
Let ω \omega denote the complex cube root of unity, so ω 2 + ω + 1 = 0 \omega^2 + \omega + 1= 0 . If we consider the equation j 2 + j k + k 2 = 0 j^2+jk+k^2=0 as an equation in k k , we get k = j ω k= j\omega and j ω 2 j \omega^2 as roots. Again, if we consider the equation 2 a ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j k ) = 0 2a(j^2+jk+k^2) + jk(j-k)=0 as an equation in a a , we get a = j k ( j + k ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) a= \frac{-jk(j+k)}{2(j^2+jk+k^2)} as a root. By the remainder factor theorem, the above condition will be satisfied iff F n ( a , j , j ω ) = 0 F_n(a, j, j \omega ) = 0 or \text{or} F n ( j k ( j + k ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) , j , k ) = 0 F_n\left (\frac{-jk(j+k)}{2(j^2+jk+k^2)}, j, k \right )= 0 Let's try to investigate the first case. Plugging the values in the expansion of F n ( a , j , k ) F_n(a,j,k) and using the fact that ω 2 = ω 1 \omega^2= -\omega - 1 , we can show that F n ( a , j , j ω ) = j n ( a ( 1 + ω n + ω 2 n ) + j ω ( 1 ω n 1 ) ) F_n (a, j, j\omega ) = j^n (a(1 + \omega^n + \omega^{2n} ) + j \omega (1-\omega^{n-1}) ) Now, if n 0 ( m o d 3 ) n \equiv 0 \pmod3 , using ω n = 1 \omega^n= 1 , we can show that F n ( a , j , j ω ) = j n ( 3 a + ω j ( ω + 2 ) ) 0 F_n (a, j, j \omega ) = j^n (3a + \omega j (\omega + 2 ) ) \neq 0 If n 1 ( m o d 3 ) n \equiv 1 \pmod3 , using ω n = ω \omega^n = \omega , we can show that F n ( a , j , j ω ) = j n ( 1 + ω ( 1 + ω ) ) = 0 F_n (a, j, j\omega ) = j^n (1 + \omega - (1 + \omega ) ) = 0 If n 2 ( m o d 3 ) n \equiv 2 \pmod3 , using ω n = ω 2 = 1 ω \omega^n = \omega^2 = -1-\omega , we can show that F n ( a , j , j ω ) = ω j ( 1 ω ) 0 F_n (a, j, j\omega ) = \omega j (1 - \omega ) \neq 0 We thus conclude F n ( a , j , j ω ) = 0 F_n(a,j,j \omega ) = 0 if and only if n 1 ( m o d 3 ) n \equiv 1 \pmod3 . There are 334 334 such numbers from 1 1 to 1000 1000 .

Let's investigate the second case, when F n ( j k ( j + k ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) , j , k ) = 0 F_n\left (\frac{-jk(j+k)}{2(j^2+jk+k^2)}, j, k \right )= 0 . Plugging these values in the expansion of F n ( a , j , k ) F_n(a, j, k) , it can be shown that F n ( j k ( j + k ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) ) = j k ( k j ) ( j n + k n + ( 1 ) n ( j + k ) n ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j n 1 + k n 1 ) \begin{array} {l l } & F_n\left (\frac{-jk(j+k)}{2(j^2+jk+k^2)} \right ) \\ = & \frac{jk(k-j)(j^n+k^n+(-1)^n(j+k)^n)}{2(j^2+jk+k^2)} + jk (j^{n-1} + k^{n-1}) \end{array} For n = 1 n=1 and n = 2 n=2 , we can manually evaluate F n ( a , j , k ) F_n(a,j,k) and show that it is equal to 0 0 in both cases. For n > 2 n>2 , we write down the binomial expansions of the powers. Note that
j k ( k j ) ( j n + k n + ( 1 ) n ( j + k ) n ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) + j k ( j n 1 + k n 1 ) = j k ( j k ) ( 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) i = 0 n 2 j i k n 2 i ( j n + k n + ( 1 ) n ( j + k ) n ) 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) \begin{array} {l l} & \frac{jk(k-j)(j^n+k^n+(-1)^n(j+k)^n)}{2(j^2+jk+k^2)} + jk (j^{n-1} + k^{n-1}) \\ = & -jk\frac{(j-k)(2(j^2+jk+k^2)\sum \limits_{i=0}^{n-2}j^ik^{n-2-i} - (j^n + k^n + (-1)^n(j+k)^n) }{2(j^2+jk+k^2)} \end{array} This has to be equal to 0 0 , so we must have ( 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) i = 0 n 2 j i k n 2 i = j n + k n + ( 1 ) n ( j + k ) ) n ( 2 ( j 2 + j k + k 2 ) i = 0 n 2 j i k n 2 i = ( 1 + ( 1 ) n ) j n + ( 1 + ( 1 ) n ) k n + ( 1 ) n i = 1 n 1 ( n i ) j n i k i \begin{array} { l l} & (2(j^2+jk+k^2)\sum \limits_{i=0}^{n-2}j^ik^{n-2-i} \\ & = j^n + k^n + (-1)^n(j+k))^n \\ \implies & (2(j^2+jk+k^2)\sum \limits_{i=0}^{n-2}j^ik^{n-2-i} \\ & =(1+(-1)^n)j^n + (1+(-1)^n)k^n + (-1)^n\sum \limits_{i=1}^{n-1} \binom{n}{i}j^{n-i}k^i \end{array} where the last step follows from writing the binomial expansion of ( j + k ) n (j+k)^n . Comparing coefficients of j n j^n and k n k^n , we obtain 1 + ( 1 ) n = 2 2 n 1 + (-1)^n = 2 \implies 2 \mid n . Again, comparing the coefficients of j k jk , we obtain ( 1 ) n ( n 1 ) = 4 n = 4 (-1)^n \binom{n}{1}= 4 \implies n=4 . Of course, n = 4 n=4 is a trivial solution. Also note that n = 4 n=4 is included in the count of the first case. Other than that, there are 2 2 values of n n satisfying the conditions; n = 1 n=1 and n = 2 n=2 . But since 1 1 ( m o d 3 ) 1 \equiv 1 \pmod3 , this is also included in the count of the first case. Thus the second case produces 1 1 more distinct solution. The total number of such n n between 1 1 and 1000 1000 is 334 + 1 = 335 334+1=335 . Our desired answer will then be 1000 335 = 665 1000-335= \boxed{665} .

Typo:
Note that f ( a , b , c ) F n ( a , b , c ) f ( a , j , k ) F n ( a , j , k ) f(a,b,c) \mid F_n(a,b,c) \iff f(a,j,k) \mid F_n(a,j,k) .

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 7 months ago

Another typo: in the middle I replaced k k with y y .

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 7 months ago

Also, please make sure you scroll to the right to see the mathematical expressions properly. :)

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Made some edits, though I'm not sure if I got all the y y 's.

I used the array environment to get your equations to display on separate lines, to reduce having to scroll back and forth.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks sir! I have checked my solution again, and it seems that all the k k 's are replaced by y y 's. But there seems to be a problem in the line "It then follows that gcd ( \gcd (\cdots ". I am not sure if I am the only one experiencing the problem, so here's a screenshot:

Loading... Loading...

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...