tan ( 2 0 1 7 π ) × tan ( 2 0 1 7 2 π ) × tan ( 2 0 1 7 3 π ) × ⋯ × tan ( 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 6 π )
What is the value of the product above?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Or just use the formula k = 1 ∏ n − 1 tan ( n k π ) = ( − 1 ) ( n − 1 ) / 2 n directly (for odd n ), which follows from the corresponding formulas for sin and cos in your link.
PS: There is a typo in your solution... you are losing the factor ( − 1 ) ( n − 1 ) / 2 somewhere along the way. Luckily, the problem did not ask about n = 2 0 1 5 ;)
Log in to reply
Edit made; thanks for catching the missing term. :) The tan formula, particularly in your more simplified form, is such a beautiful result, which was why I was wondering if there was a more direct way of proving it other than combining the sin and cos formulas found in my link. I think that what Pi Han Goh had in mind when he posted the question was more in line with a generalization of Joel Tan's suggestion.
Log in to reply
Yes, indeed, these "curious identities" are beautiful, simple and elegant. I like the proofs in terms of roots of unity: they are quick and transparent. If we let z = e π i / n for odd n , then tan ( n k π ) = i 1 z k + z − k z k − z − k and our result follows from k = 1 ∏ n − 1 ( z k − z − k ) = ( − 1 ) ( n − 1 ) / 2 n , k = 1 ∏ n − 1 ( z k + z − k ) = ( − 1 ) ( n − 1 ) / 2 .
Hint: they are all roots of tan (2017x)=0. tan (2017x) can be expressed as a (nice) rational function in tan (x). Then Vieta's can be used.
How do you do it sir ? I don't have the strength and will-power to write out a solution after solving a question .
Btw , I had guessed this question correct :-)
Log in to reply
The method is discussed here
Log in to reply
Haha sir you've got me wrong .I never said that I didn't solve it after getting the question correct .
I just meant that for question's like these , I always go for a guess first :P
I think an easier way out of this problem will be to use the identity r = 1 ∏ n − 1 tan n r π = sin 2 n π n which we can easily derive.
one can do this by complex numbers by using equation x^n-1=0 where n is 2017 and roots are e^(2kpi/n). k belongs to {0,1,....,2016}
My solution is quite long but maybe it'll be helpful.
I consider separately the product of sine and of cosine.
Consider first
P = ∏ k = 1 n − 1 sin n π k = ∏ k = 1 n − 1 sin 2 n 2 π k .
Note that
sin 2 n 2 π k = − sin 2 n 2 π ( 2 n − k )
and, excluding the case k = n for which the sine is equal to sin π = 0 , I can then write:
∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 sin 2 n 2 k π = ( − 1 ) n − 1 P 2
Now consider the ( 2 n ) t h roots of unity:
ω k = ω k = e 2 n 2 π i k for 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 n − 1 and k = n ,
we of course have sin 2 n 2 k π = 2 i ω k − ω − k and so:
∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 sin 2 n 2 k π = 2 2 ( n − 1 ) i 2 ( n − 1 ) 1 ∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( ω k − ω − k )
Remind that the ( 2 n ) t h roots of unity are the solution of the equation f ( x ) = ∑ s = 0 2 n − 1 x s = 0 but we are excluding the k = n root which is e i π = − 1 . So the roots that we are considering are the 2 n − 2 roots of the equation g ( x ) = f ( x ) / ( x + 1 ) = ∑ m = 0 n − 1 x 2 m = 0 . Now from Vieta's we have that ∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ω k = 1 and so we can rewrite our product as:
∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( ω 2 k − 1 ) = ∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( ω k − 1 ) ( ω k + 1 ) = ∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( 1 − ω k ) ∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( ( − 1 ) − ω k ) .
Now finally we have that
∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( 1 − ω k ) = g ( 1 )
and
∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 ( − 1 − ω k ) = g ( − 1 ) .
But g ( 1 ) = g ( − 1 ) = n and we can write:
∏ k = 1 k = n 2 n − 1 sin 2 n 2 k π = 2 2 ( n − 1 ) ( − 1 ) n − 1 n 2 = ( − 1 ) n − 1 P 2 and so
P = 2 n − 1 n
I think it is possible to proceed in a similar way also for the product of cosine, but I want to use Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind which are defined as
U n ( c o s θ ) = sin θ sin ( n + 1 ) θ .
From the definition t is simple to prove that the zeros of U n ( x ) are
x k = cos n − 1 k π for k = 1 , . . . , n
and also it is simple to prove the reoccurrence relation
U n ( x ) = x U n − 1 ( x ) + T n ( x )
where T n are the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
This relation can be used to prove that the constant term of U n ( x ) is 0 if n is odd, 1 if n = 4 m and − 1 if n = 4 m + 2 and that the leading term is 2 n .
Again, using Vieta's we see that ∏ k = 1 n cos n − 1 k π are equal to the constant term of U n ( x ) over the leading term. In our case we have:
∏ k = 1 n − 1 cos n k π = 2 n − 1 U n − 1 ( 0 ) = 2 n − 1 1 .
In the last step I used the fact that for us n = 2 0 1 7 and so n − 1 = 4 ∗ 5 0 2 .
Putting all together:
∏ k = 1 n − 1 sin n π k ∏ k = 1 n − 1 c o s n π k 1 = 2 n − 1 n 2 n − 1 = n = 2 0 1 7 .
Hey thanks, as you have shown, it's possible to find the identity for the product of sines and cosines, separately. +1
Sir your problems are too awesome
THANK YOUUUU
Yes...they are indeed
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Note first that for any odd positive integer n we have that
tan ( n k π ) = − tan ( n ( n − k ) π ) for 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 n − 1 .
So in the product k = 1 ∏ n − 1 tan ( n k π ) we can combine 2 n − 1 pairs of terms to see that this product is equal to
k = 1 ∏ 2 n − 1 ( − 1 ) 2 n − 1 tan 2 ( n k π ) = ( − 1 ) 2 n − 1 ⎝ ⎛ k = 1 ∏ 2 n − 1 tan ( n k π ) ⎠ ⎞ 2 for odd n .
But according to formula (35) here this is just equal to ( − 1 ) 2 n − 1 ( n ) 2 = ( − 1 ) 2 n − 1 n .
So in this case the answer is ( − 1 ) 1 0 0 8 ∗ 2 0 1 7 = 2 0 1 7 .
In anticipation of the Challenge Master's response, I will make an attempt at proving formula (35) shortly .....
Edit: Formulas and their respective proofs for similar products involving the sine and cosine functions are provided here . Taken together, these provide us with the identity in formula (35). Perhaps there may be a more direct proof for the tan product that doesn't rely on finding the sine and cosine products first.