If x is a number smaller than x 2 , does that mean that x 2 must be smaller than x 3 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
First condition:
If x = 5 .
⇒ x 2 = 5 2 = 2 5 which is greater than 5.
⇒ x 3 = 5 3 = 1 2 5 which is greater than 5 2 = 2 5 .
It satisfies the condition.
Second condition:
If x = − 5
⇒ x 2 = ( − 5 ) 2 = 2 5 which is greater than -5.
⇒ x 3 = ( − 5 ) 3 = − 1 2 5 which is smaller than 25.
It doesn't satisfies the condition.
Hence the answer is n o
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
A counterexample:
x = − 1 ⟹ − 1 < ( − 1 ) 2 = 1 ⟹ ( − 1 ) 2 = 1 < ( − 1 ) 3 = − 1
If 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 , then x ≥ x 2 , so x < 0 or x > 1 . If x > 1 , then x < x 2 < x 3 , so for x > 1 the statement is true. However we still have a possible case: x < 0 . Note that ( − a ) 2 = a 2 . So it doesn't matter what is the value of x (under 0 ), x and x 3 are negativ numbers, and x 2 is a positive number. So in this case x 2 < x 3 .
Therefore the statement is sometimes true, sometimes false.