Let be a set of subsets of such that no element of is completely contained in any other element of : that is, for any two distinct subsets , and .
What is the maximum possible value of ?
(Bonus: generalize to .)
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The maximum possible value of ∣ X ∣ is 6 . To see this, first notice that X = the set of subsets with two elements satisfies the condition of the problem, with ∣ X ∣ = ( 2 4 ) = 6 . To see that this is maximal, note that the set of subsets of { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 } can be covered by six chains : ∅ , { 1 } , { 1 , 2 } , { 1 , 2 , 3 } , { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 } { 2 } , { 2 , 3 } , { 2 , 3 , 4 } { 3 } , { 3 , 4 } , { 1 , 3 , 4 } { 4 } , { 1 , 4 } , { 1 , 2 , 4 } { 1 , 3 } { 2 , 4 } where each element in each chain is contained in the next one. Note that any set X of subsets with the property in the problem must have at most one element in each chain, because no element of X can contain another element of X . (The elements of X are colored in red above.)
Sets with the property in the problem are called antichains . So every antichain has size at most 6 . This shows that X is maximal.
It is not hard to guess the answer for { 1 , 2 , … , n } ; it is ( ⌊ n / 2 ⌋ n ) , and the set of subsets of size ⌊ n / 2 ⌋ is a maximal antichain. When n is odd, note that it is not unique: for instance, when n = 5 , the set of two-element subsets and the set of three-element subsets are both maximal antichains of size 1 0 .
Showing that this answer is correct is not easy: the result is known as Sperner's theorem.
For more on this topic, see Dilworth's theorem .